381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28989122)
1. Comparison of Microleakage of Class V Cavities restored with the Embrace WetBond Class V Composite Resin and Conventional Opallis Composite Resin.
Tavangar M; Zohri Z; Sheikhnezhad H; Shahbeig S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Oct; 18(10):867-873. PubMed ID: 28989122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.
Behery H; El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Nabih S; Saleh B
Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(4):383-388. PubMed ID: 30648363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage of class V resin composites using various self-etching adhesives: an in vitro study.
Chandra PV; Harikumar V; Ramkiran D; Krishna MJ; Gouda MV
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 23579893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of fiber inserts, type of composite, and gingival margin location on the microleakage in Class II resin composite restorations.
Dhingra V; Taneja S; Kumar M; Kumari M
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 23802641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microleakage of a self-adhesive class V composite on primary and permanent dentitions.
Shafiei L; Mojiri P; Ghahraman Y; Rakhshan V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 24171990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials.
Baghalian A; Nakhjavani YB; Hooshmand T; Motahhary P; Bahramian H
Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 28(6):1453-60. PubMed ID: 23135785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An
Bansal D; Mahajan M
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 29256469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
Owens BM; Johnson WW
J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 16430011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microleakage of Class II composite resin restorations with self-adhesive composite resin liners.
Doozandeh M; Shafiei F; Mohammadi F
Gen Dent; 2017; 65(4):41-47. PubMed ID: 28682281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro microleakage study of class V cavities restored with a new self-adhesive flowable composite resin versus different flowable materials.
Sadeghi M
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2012 Jul; 9(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 23162589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the marginal integrity of a bioactive restorative material.
Owens BM; Phebus JG; Johnson WW
Gen Dent; 2018; 66(3):32-36. PubMed ID: 29714697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations.
Owens BM; Johnson WW
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 16924989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Microleakage in class V cavities restored with esthetic materials, using different restorative techniques].
Russo EM; de Carvalho RC; Matson E; dos Santos RS
Pesqui Odontol Bras; 2001; 15(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 11705197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities.
Yazici AR; Baseren M; Dayangaç B
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 12540117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of location of the gingival margin on the microleakage and internal voids of nanocomposites.
Ozel E; Korkmaz Y; Attar N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):65-72. PubMed ID: 18997918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro analysis of the effects of acid or laser etching on microleakage around composite resin restorations.
Yazici AR; Frentzen M; Dayangac B
J Dent; 2001 Jul; 29(5):355-61. PubMed ID: 11472808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of aluminum chloride hemostatic agent on microleakage of class V composite resin restorations bonded with all-in-one adhesive.
Mohammadi N; Kimyai S; Bahari M; Pournaghi-Azar F; Mozafari A
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2012 Sep; 17(5):e841-4. PubMed ID: 22322497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
