BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28991422)

  • 1. Emission Standards, Public Transit, and Infant Health.
    Ngo NS
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2017; 36(4):773-89. PubMed ID: 28991422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analyzing the Relationship Between Bus Pollution Policies and Morbidity Using a Quasi-Experiment.
    Ngo NS
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Sep; 94(37):e1499. PubMed ID: 26376392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clean fleets, different streets: evaluating the effect of New York City's clean bus program on changes to estimated ambient air pollution.
    Lovasi GS; Treat CA; Fry D; Shah I; Clougherty JE; Berberian A; Perera FP; Kioumourtzoglou MA
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2023 May; 33(3):332-338. PubMed ID: 35906405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In-use fuel economy of hybrid-electric school buses in Iowa.
    Hallmark S; Sperry B; Mudgal A
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 May; 61(5):504-10. PubMed ID: 21608490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrification of Transit Buses in the United States Reduces Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
    Martinez SS; Samaras C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2024 Mar; 58(9):4137-4144. PubMed ID: 38373231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health Benefits from Upgrading Public Buses for Cleaner Air: A Case Study of Clark County, Nevada and the United States.
    Olawepo JO; Chen LA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Feb; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 30823388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adopting electric school buses in the United States: Health and climate benefits.
    Choma EF; Robinson LA; Nadeau KC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 May; 121(22):e2320338121. PubMed ID: 38768355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emissions of toxic pollutants from compressed natural gas and low sulfur diesel-fueled heavy-duty transit buses tested over multiple driving cycles.
    Kado NY; Okamoto RA; Kuzmicky PA; Kobayashi R; Ayala A; Gebel ME; Rieger PL; Maddox C; Zafonte L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Oct; 39(19):7638-49. PubMed ID: 16245838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health and Climate Incentives for the Deployment of Cleaner On-Road Vehicle Technologies.
    Minet L; Wang A; Hatzopoulou M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 May; 55(10):6602-6612. PubMed ID: 33929197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real-time measurements of nitrogen oxide emissions from in-use New York City transit buses using a chase vehicle.
    Shorter JH; Herndon S; Zahniser MS; Nelson DD; Wormhoudt J; Demerjian KL; Kolb CE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Oct; 39(20):7991-8000. PubMed ID: 16295866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health effects caused by primary fine particulate matter (PM2.5) emitted from buses in the Helsinki metropolitan area, Finland.
    Tainio M; Tuomisto JT; Hänninen O; Aarnio P; Koistinen KJ; Jantunen MJ; Pekkanen J
    Risk Anal; 2005 Feb; 25(1):151-60. PubMed ID: 15787764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unregulated emissions from compressed natural gas (CNG) transit buses configured with and without oxidation catalyst.
    Okamoto RA; Kado NY; Kuzmicky PA; Ayala A; Kobayashi R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jan; 40(1):332-41. PubMed ID: 16433369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. School buses, diesel emissions, and respiratory health.
    Beatty TK; Shimshack JP
    J Health Econ; 2011 Sep; 30(5):987-99. PubMed ID: 21741102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of on-road emissions for hybrid and regular transit buses.
    Hallmark SL; Wang B; Sperry R
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 Oct; 63(10):1212-20. PubMed ID: 24282974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The contribution of motor vehicle emissions to ambient fine particulate matter public health impacts in New York City: a health burden assessment.
    Kheirbek I; Haney J; Douglas S; Ito K; Matte T
    Environ Health; 2016 Aug; 15(1):89. PubMed ID: 27566439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating real-world CO
    Yang L; Zhang S; Wu Y; Chen Q; Niu T; Huang X; Zhang S; Zhang L; Zhou Y; Hao J
    Environ Pollut; 2016 Nov; 218():453-462. PubMed ID: 27443949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The London low emission zone baseline study.
    Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fine urban and precursor emissions control for diesel urban transit buses.
    Lanni T
    Environ Pollut; 2003; 123(3):427-37. PubMed ID: 12667771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Emission Characteristics of Particulate Matter from Diesel Buses Meeting Different China Emission Standards Fueled with Biodiesel].
    Lou DM; Zhao CZ; Xu N; Tan PQ; Hu ZY
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2017 Jun; 38(6):2301-2307. PubMed ID: 29965347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions from CNG transit buses equipped with three-way catalysts compared to lean-burn engines and oxidation catalyst technologies.
    Yoon S; Collins J; Thiruvengadam A; Gautam M; Herner J; Ayala A
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 Aug; 63(8):926-33. PubMed ID: 24010373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.