These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28992423)

  • 1. Housekeeping and tissue-specific cis-regulatory elements: Recipes for specificity and recipes for activity.
    Russo M; Natoli G; Ghisletti S
    Transcription; 2018; 9(3):177-181. PubMed ID: 28992423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High constitutive activity of a broad panel of housekeeping and tissue-specific
    Curina A; Termanini A; Barozzi I; Prosperini E; Simonatto M; Polletti S; Silvola A; Soldi M; Austenaa L; Bonaldi T; Ghisletti S; Natoli G
    Genes Dev; 2017 Feb; 31(4):399-412. PubMed ID: 28275002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancer-core-promoter specificity separates developmental and housekeeping gene regulation.
    Zabidi MA; Arnold CD; Schernhuber K; Pagani M; Rath M; Frank O; Stark A
    Nature; 2015 Feb; 518(7540):556-9. PubMed ID: 25517091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regulatory architecture of housekeeping genes is driven by promoter assemblies.
    Dejosez M; Dall'Agnese A; Ramamoorthy M; Platt J; Yin X; Hogan M; Brosh R; Weintraub AS; Hnisz D; Abraham BJ; Young RA; Zwaka TP
    Cell Rep; 2023 May; 42(5):112505. PubMed ID: 37182209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-throughput functional comparison of promoter and enhancer activities.
    Nguyen TA; Jones RD; Snavely AR; Pfenning AR; Kirchner R; Hemberg M; Gray JM
    Genome Res; 2016 Aug; 26(8):1023-33. PubMed ID: 27311442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regulatory Enhancer-Core-Promoter Communication via Transcription Factors and Cofactors.
    Zabidi MA; Stark A
    Trends Genet; 2016 Dec; 32(12):801-814. PubMed ID: 27816209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Promoter or enhancer, what's the difference? Deconstruction of established distinctions and presentation of a unifying model.
    Andersson R
    Bioessays; 2015 Mar; 37(3):314-23. PubMed ID: 25450156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-range interactions between three transcriptional enhancers, active Vkappa gene promoters, and a 3' boundary sequence spanning 46 kilobases.
    Liu Z; Garrard WT
    Mol Cell Biol; 2005 Apr; 25(8):3220-31. PubMed ID: 15798207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determinants of enhancer and promoter activities of regulatory elements.
    Andersson R; Sandelin A
    Nat Rev Genet; 2020 Feb; 21(2):71-87. PubMed ID: 31605096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A unified architecture of transcriptional regulatory elements.
    Andersson R; Sandelin A; Danko CG
    Trends Genet; 2015 Aug; 31(8):426-33. PubMed ID: 26073855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regulatory regions in DNA: promoters, enhancers, silencers, and insulators.
    Riethoven JJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 674():33-42. PubMed ID: 20827584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards genome-wide prediction and characterization of enhancers in plants.
    Marand AP; Zhang T; Zhu B; Jiang J
    Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech; 2017 Jan; 1860(1):131-139. PubMed ID: 27321818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RPA Interacts with HIRA and Regulates H3.3 Deposition at Gene Regulatory Elements in Mammalian Cells.
    Zhang H; Gan H; Wang Z; Lee JH; Zhou H; Ordog T; Wold MS; Ljungman M; Zhang Z
    Mol Cell; 2017 Jan; 65(2):272-284. PubMed ID: 28107649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pervasive and CpG-dependent promoter-like characteristics of transcribed enhancers.
    Steinhaus R; Gonzalez T; Seelow D; Robinson PN
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Jun; 48(10):5306-5317. PubMed ID: 32338759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discriminative identification of transcriptional responses of promoters and enhancers after stimulus.
    Kleftogiannis D; Kalnis P; Arner E; Bajic VB
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Feb; 45(4):e25. PubMed ID: 27789687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Demystifying the secret mission of enhancers: linking distal regulatory elements to target genes.
    Yao L; Berman BP; Farnham PJ
    Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol; 2015; 50(6):550-73. PubMed ID: 26446758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High throughput technologies for the functional discovery of mammalian enhancers: new approaches for understanding transcriptional regulatory network dynamics.
    Dailey L
    Genomics; 2015 Sep; 106(3):151-158. PubMed ID: 26072436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Epigenome overlap measure (EPOM) for comparing tissue/cell types based on chromatin states.
    Li WV; Razaee ZS; Li JJ
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):10. PubMed ID: 26817822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Mechanisms of distant enhancer action on DNA and in chromatin].
    Studitskiĭ VM
    Mol Biol (Mosk); 2009; 43(2):204-14. PubMed ID: 19425490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancer choice in cis and in trans in Drosophila melanogaster: role of the promoter.
    Morris JR; Petrov DA; Lee AM; Wu CT
    Genetics; 2004 Aug; 167(4):1739-47. PubMed ID: 15342512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.