These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28992453)

  • 1. FIFS: A data mining method for informative marker selection in high dimensional population genomic data.
    Kavakiotis I; Samaras P; Triantafyllidis A; Vlahavas I
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Nov; 90():146-154. PubMed ID: 28992453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. TRES: Identification of Discriminatory and Informative SNPs from Population Genomic Data.
    Kavakiotis I; Triantafyllidis A; Ntelidou D; Alexandri P; Megens HJ; Crooijmans RP; Groenen MA; Tsoumakas G; Vlahavas I
    J Hered; 2015; 106(5):672-6. PubMed ID: 26137847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genome-wide association data classification and SNPs selection using two-stage quality-based Random Forests.
    Nguyen TT; Huang J; Wu Q; Nguyen T; Li M
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S5. PubMed ID: 25708662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A machine learning approach for the identification of population-informative markers from high-throughput genotyping data: application to several pig breeds.
    Schiavo G; Bertolini F; Galimberti G; Bovo S; Dall'Olio S; Nanni Costa L; Gallo M; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2020 Feb; 14(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 31603060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of three statistical approaches for feature selection for fine-scale genetic population assignment in four pig breeds.
    Hayah I; Ababou M; Botti S; Badaoui B
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2021 Jul; 53(3):395. PubMed ID: 34245361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined use of principal component analysis and random forests identify population-informative single nucleotide polymorphisms: application in cattle breeds.
    Bertolini F; Galimberti G; Calò DG; Schiavo G; Matassino D; Fontanesi L
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Oct; 132(5):346-56. PubMed ID: 25781205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative analysis of five different methods to design a breed-specific SNP panel for cattle.
    Kumar H; Panigrahi M; Chhotaray S; Parida S; Chauhan A; Bhushan B; Gaur GK; Mishra BP; Singh RK
    Anim Biotechnol; 2021 Feb; 32(1):130-136. PubMed ID: 31364913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increasing accuracy of genomic selection in presence of high density marker panels through the prioritization of relevant polymorphisms.
    Chang LY; Toghiani S; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
    BMC Genet; 2019 Feb; 20(1):21. PubMed ID: 30795734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of approaches for identifying population informative markers from high density SNP chips.
    Wilkinson S; Wiener P; Archibald AL; Law A; Schnabel RD; McKay SD; Taylor JF; Ogden R
    BMC Genet; 2011 May; 12():45. PubMed ID: 21569514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting the disease of Alzheimer with SNP biomarkers and clinical data using data mining classification approach: decision tree.
    Erdoğan O; Aydin Son Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():511-5. PubMed ID: 25160237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of a genomic relationship matrix for breed assignment of cattle breeds: comparison and combination with a machine learning method.
    Wilmot H; Niehoff T; Soyeurt H; Gengler N; Calus MPL
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37220912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimal SNP overlap among multiple panels of ancestry informative markers argues for more international collaboration.
    Soundararajan U; Yun L; Shi M; Kidd KK
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jul; 23():25-32. PubMed ID: 26977931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using selection index theory to estimate consistency of multi-locus linkage disequilibrium across populations.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Calus MP
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 26187501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Relative Power of Structural Genomic Variation versus SNPs in Explaining the Quantitative Trait Growth in the Marine Teleost
    Ruigrok M; Xue B; Catanach A; Zhang M; Jesson L; Davy M; Wellenreuther M
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 35885912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of ancestry-informative SNP and microhaplotype markers.
    Cheung EYY; Phillips C; Eduardoff M; Lareu MV; McNevin D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102141. PubMed ID: 31442930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of population-informative markers from high-density genotyping data through combined feature selection and machine learning algorithms: Application to European autochthonous and cosmopolitan pig breeds.
    Schiavo G; Bertolini F; Bovo S; Galimberti G; Muñoz M; Bozzi R; Čandek-Potokar M; Óvilo C; Fontanesi L
    Anim Genet; 2024 Apr; 55(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 38191264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applications of random forest feature selection for fine-scale genetic population assignment.
    Sylvester EVA; Bentzen P; Bradbury IR; Clément M; Pearce J; Horne J; Beiko RG
    Evol Appl; 2018 Feb; 11(2):153-165. PubMed ID: 29387152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AIM-SNPtag: A computationally efficient approach for developing ancestry-informative SNP panels.
    Zhao S; Shi CM; Ma L; Liu Q; Liu Y; Wu F; Chi L; Chen H
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():245-253. PubMed ID: 30476751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SNP selection and classification of genome-wide SNP data using stratified sampling random forests.
    Wu Q; Ye Y; Liu Y; Ng MK
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2012 Sep; 11(3):216-27. PubMed ID: 22987127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to choose sets of ancestry informative markers: A supervised feature selection approach.
    Pfaffelhuber P; Grundner-Culemann F; Lipphardt V; Baumdicker F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102259. PubMed ID: 32105949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.