BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28992915)

  • 1. A cross-sectional study for predicting tail biting risk in pig farms using classification and regression tree analysis.
    Scollo A; Gottardo F; Contiero B; Edwards SA
    Prev Vet Med; 2017 Oct; 146():114-120. PubMed ID: 28992915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency of tail lesions and risk factors for tail biting in heavy pig production from weaning to 170 kg live weight.
    Scollo A; Contiero B; Gottardo F
    Vet J; 2016 Jan; 207():92-98. PubMed ID: 26626091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A survey of straw use and tail biting in Swedish pig farms rearing undocked pigs.
    Wallgren T; Westin R; Gunnarsson S
    Acta Vet Scand; 2016 Dec; 58(1):84. PubMed ID: 27919291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk factors for tail lesions in undocked fattening pigs reared on Swiss farms.
    Sell A; Vidondo B; Wechsler B; Burla J; Nathues H
    Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd; 2020 Nov; 162(11):683-695. PubMed ID: 33140727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reducing estimated tail biting risk in German weaner pigs using a management tool.
    Grümpel A; Krieter J; Dippel S
    Vet J; 2019 Dec; 254():105406. PubMed ID: 31836167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tail-biting in outdoor pig production.
    Walker PK; Bilkei G
    Vet J; 2006 Mar; 171(2):367-9. PubMed ID: 15951210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. More tail lesions among undocked than tail docked pigs in a conventional herd.
    Lahrmann HP; Busch ME; D'Eath RB; Forkman B; Hansen CF
    Animal; 2017 Oct; 11(10):1825-1831. PubMed ID: 28294097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tail-biting: a new perspective.
    Taylor NR; Main DC; Mendl M; Edwards SA
    Vet J; 2010 Nov; 186(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 19804997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tail biting in pigs--causes and management intervention strategies to reduce the behavioural disorder. A review.
    Sonoda LT; Fels M; Oczak M; Vranken E; Ismayilova G; Guarino M; Viazzi S; Bahr C; Berckmans D; Hartung J
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2013; 126(3-4):104-12. PubMed ID: 23540192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of pen design on tail biting and tail-directed behaviour of finishing pigs with intact tails.
    Brandt P; Hakansson F; Jensen T; Nielsen MBF; Lahrmann HP; Hansen CF; Forkman B
    Animal; 2020 May; 14(5):1034-1042. PubMed ID: 31735187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The 'Real Welfare' scheme: benchmarking welfare outcomes for commercially farmed pigs.
    Pandolfi F; Stoddart K; Wainwright N; Kyriazakis I; Edwards SA
    Animal; 2017 Oct; 11(10):1816-1824. PubMed ID: 28249629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Keeping pigs with undocked tails on conventionally producing farms. A feasibility study].
    Holling C; Tölle KH; Otto G; Blaha T
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere; 2016 Oct; 44(5):296-306. PubMed ID: 27580118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in activity and object manipulation before tail damage in finisher pigs as an early detector of tail biting.
    Larsen MLV; Andersen HM; Pedersen LJ
    Animal; 2019 May; 13(5):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 30324902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tail lesions in fattening pigs: relationships with postmortem meat inspection and influence of a tail biting management tool.
    Vom Brocke AL; Karnholz C; Madey-Rindermann D; Gauly M; Leeb C; Winckler C; Schrader L; Dippel S
    Animal; 2019 Apr; 13(4):835-844. PubMed ID: 30132431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tear staining in pigs: a potential tool for welfare assessment on commercial farms.
    Telkänranta H; Marchant JN; Valros A
    Animal; 2016 Feb; 10(2):318-25. PubMed ID: 26303891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prevalence of risk factors for tail biting on commercial farms and intervention strategies.
    Taylor NR; Parker RM; Mendl M; Edwards SA; Main DC
    Vet J; 2012 Oct; 194(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 22503206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tail biting in pigs: understanding the intractable problem.
    Edwards SA
    Vet J; 2006 Mar; 171(2):198-9. PubMed ID: 15908246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The "Real Welfare" scheme: Identification of risk and protective factors for welfare outcomes in commercial pig farms in the UK.
    Pandolfi F; Kyriazakis I; Stoddart K; Wainwright N; Edwards SA
    Prev Vet Med; 2017 Oct; 146():34-43. PubMed ID: 28992926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between tail biting in pigs, docking procedure and other management practices.
    Hunter EJ; Jones TA; Guise HJ; Penny RH; Hoste S
    Vet J; 2001 Jan; 161(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 11145831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of docking length on the risk of tail biting, tail-directed behaviour, aggression and activity level of growing pigs kept under commercial conditions.
    Thodberg K; Herskin MS; Jensen T; Jensen KH
    Animal; 2018 Dec; 12(12):2609-2618. PubMed ID: 29573756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.