These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28993244)

  • 1. Effects of reinforcement value on instruction following under schedules of negative reinforcement.
    Alessandri J; Cançado CRX; Abreu-Rodrigues J
    Behav Processes; 2017 Dec; 145():27-30. PubMed ID: 28993244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of instructions on the sensitivity of negatively reinforced human behavior to extinction.
    Alessandri J; Cançado CRX
    Behav Processes; 2017 Mar; 136():50-53. PubMed ID: 28115183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human choice under schedules of negative reinforcement.
    Alessandri J; Cançado CR
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():70-3. PubMed ID: 26518610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The recurrence of negatively reinforced responding of humans.
    Alessandri J; Lattal KA; Cançado CR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Nov; 104(3):211-22. PubMed ID: 26676180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Behavioral effects of delayed timeouts from reinforcement.
    Byrne T; Poling A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Mar; 107(2):208-217. PubMed ID: 28194789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Context affects resurgence of negatively reinforced human behavior.
    Alessandri J; Cançado CRX
    Behav Processes; 2020 Jan; 170():104018. PubMed ID: 31805317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tests of behavior momentum in simple and multiple schedules with rats and pigeons.
    Cohen SL; Riley DS; Weigle PA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Sep; 60(2):255-91. PubMed ID: 8409822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of modeling versus instructions on sensitivity to reinforcement schedules.
    Neef NA; Marckel J; Ferreri S; Jung S; Nist L; Armstrong N
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(3):267-81. PubMed ID: 15529886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The generality of selective observing.
    Gaynor ST; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Mar; 77(2):171-87. PubMed ID: 11936250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The long-term effect of high- and low-rate responding histories on fixed-interval responding in rats.
    Cole MR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 11256866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: effects of relative reinforcement and schedule type.
    Shull RL; Gaynor ST; Grimes JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 May; 75(3):247-74. PubMed ID: 11453618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A test of the reward-contrast hypothesis.
    Dalecki SJ; Panoz-Brown DE; Crystal JD
    Behav Processes; 2017 Dec; 145():15-17. PubMed ID: 28965970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Timeout postponement without increased reinforcement frequency.
    Pietras CJ; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Sep; 74(2):147-64. PubMed ID: 11029020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of reinforcement frequency and response requirements on the maintenance of behavior.
    Rider DP; D'Angelo BJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Jan; 53(1):141-53. PubMed ID: 2299284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of a variety of instructions on human fixed-interval performance.
    Lefrancois JR; Chase PN; Joyce JH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 May; 49(3):383-93. PubMed ID: 16812546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term effects of suppressing the preratio pause.
    Derenne A; Richardson JV; Baron A
    Behav Processes; 2006 Mar; 72(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 16388917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Timeout from a high-force requirement as a reinforcer: an effective procedure for human operant research.
    Alessandri J; Rivière V
    Behav Processes; 2013 Oct; 99():1-6. PubMed ID: 23751256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dominant rats are natural risk takers and display increased motivation for food reward.
    Davis JF; Krause EG; Melhorn SJ; Sakai RR; Benoit SC
    Neuroscience; 2009 Aug; 162(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 19393296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-imposed timeouts under increasing response requirements.
    Dardano JF
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Mar; 19(2):269-87. PubMed ID: 16811663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variable-ratio schedules of timeout from avoidance: effects of d-amphetamine and morphine.
    Galizio M; Allen AR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Sep; 56(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 1955812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.