BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28993971)

  • 1. Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction with Maximum Parsimony.
    Herbst L; Fischer M
    Bull Math Biol; 2017 Dec; 79(12):2865-2886. PubMed ID: 28993971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the Accuracy of Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction for Ultrametric Trees with Parsimony.
    Herbst L; Fischer M
    Bull Math Biol; 2018 Apr; 80(4):864-879. PubMed ID: 29476399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maximum parsimony on subsets of taxa.
    Fischer M; Thatte BD
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(2):290-3. PubMed ID: 19538973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the uniqueness of the maximum parsimony tree for data with up to two substitutions: An extension of the classic Buneman theorem in phylogenetics.
    Fischer M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2019 Aug; 137():127-137. PubMed ID: 30928353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis on the reconstruction accuracy of the Fitch method for inferring ancestral states.
    Yang J; Li J; Dong L; Grünewald S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 12():18. PubMed ID: 21226965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ancestral sequence alignment under optimal conditions.
    Hudek AK; Brown DG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 6():273. PubMed ID: 16293191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-hereditary Maximum Parsimony trees.
    Fischer M
    J Math Biol; 2012 Aug; 65(2):293-308. PubMed ID: 21842167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used.
    Takahashi K; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Aug; 17(8):1251-8. PubMed ID: 10908645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying the accuracy of ancestral state prediction in a phylogenetic tree under maximum parsimony.
    Herbst L; Li H; Steel M
    J Math Biol; 2019 May; 78(6):1953-1979. PubMed ID: 30758663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the inference of large phylogenies with long branches: how long is too long?
    Mossel E; Roch S; Sly A
    Bull Math Biol; 2011 Jul; 73(7):1627-44. PubMed ID: 20931293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistically consistent and computationally efficient inference of ancestral DNA sequences in the TKF91 model under dense taxon sampling.
    Fan WT; Roch S
    Bull Math Biol; 2020 Jan; 82(2):21. PubMed ID: 31970502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Cooperative Co-Evolutionary Genetic Algorithm for Tree Scoring and Ancestral Genome Inference.
    Gao N; Zhang Y; Feng B; Tang J
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2015; 12(6):1248-54. PubMed ID: 26671797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical Inconsistency of Maximum Parsimony for k-Tuple-Site Data.
    Galla M; Wicke K; Fischer M
    Bull Math Biol; 2019 Apr; 81(4):1173-1200. PubMed ID: 30607881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Approximate maximum parsimony and ancestral maximum likelihood.
    Alon N; Chor B; Pardi F; Rapoport A
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2010; 7(1):183-7. PubMed ID: 20150680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reconstructing ancestral genomic sequences by co-evolution: formal definitions, computational issues, and biological examples.
    Tuller T; Birin H; Kupiec M; Ruppin E
    J Comput Biol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1327-44. PubMed ID: 20874411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A practical algorithm for estimation of the maximum likelihood ancestral reconstruction error.
    Hickey G; Blanchette M
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2010; ():31-42. PubMed ID: 19908355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematics and morphological evolution within the moss family Bryaceae: a comparison between parsimony and Bayesian methods for reconstruction of ancestral character states.
    Pedersen N; Holyoak DT; Newton AE
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2007 Jun; 43(3):891-907. PubMed ID: 17161629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Species Tree Inference Using a Mixture Model.
    Ullah I; Parviainen P; Lagergren J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Sep; 32(9):2469-82. PubMed ID: 25963975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferring Trees.
    Whelan S; Morrison DA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1525():349-377. PubMed ID: 27896728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.