BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28994144)

  • 1. Stereoacuity measurement using a phoropter combined with two 4K smartphones.
    Wu H; Liu S; Wang R
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Mar; 101(2):272-275. PubMed ID: 28994144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of a New, Filter-Free Stereopsis Test (BEST) With the Randot Stereotest in a Pediatric Cohort.
    Lagstein O; Hecht I; Anteby I
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2020 Mar; 57(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 32203597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of Stereopsis in Patients with Impaired Binocularity.
    Han SB; Yang HK; Kim J; Hong K; Lee B; Hwang JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Jun; 93(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 26927523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distance stereoacuity norms for the mentor B-VAT II-SG video acuity tester in young children and young adults.
    Yildirim C; Altinsoy HI; Yakut E
    J AAPOS; 1998 Feb; 2(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 10532363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity and repeatability of contour-based visotec distance stereoacuity test.
    Ale Magar JB; Shah SP; Sleep MG; Willett FA; Dai SH
    Clin Exp Optom; 2023 Apr; 106(3):283-289. PubMed ID: 35125046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Manufacturer changes lead to clinically important differences between two editions of the TNO stereotest.
    van Doorn LL; Evans BJ; Edgar DF; Fortuin MF
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 Mar; 34(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 24355036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of stereoscopic acuity: longitudinal study using a computer-based random-dot stereo test.
    Takai Y; Sato M; Tan R; Hirai T
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2005; 49(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15692766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of a new Distance Randot stereoacuity test.
    Fu VL; Birch EE; Holmes JM
    J AAPOS; 2006 Oct; 10(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 17070476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of FD2 (Frisby Davis distance) stereotest in surgical management of intermittent exotropia.
    Singh A; Sharma P; Singh D; Saxena R; Sharma A; Menon V
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 97(10):1318-21. PubMed ID: 23902676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frisby Davis distance stereoacuity values in visually normal children.
    Adams WE; Hrisos S; Richardson S; Davis H; Frisby JP; Clarke MP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 89(11):1438-41. PubMed ID: 16234448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Defining real change in measures of stereoacuity.
    Adams WE; Leske DA; Hatt SR; Holmes JM
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Feb; 116(2):281-5. PubMed ID: 19091410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stereoacuity thresholds before and after visual acuity testing.
    Smith SJ; Leske DA; Hatt SR; Holmes JM
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Jan; 119(1):164-9. PubMed ID: 21924502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of stereopsis thresholds measured with conventional methods and a new eye tracking method.
    Liu L; Yu B; Xu L; Wang S; Zhao L; Wu H
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293735. PubMed ID: 37917615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of the agreement between contour-based circles and random dot-based near stereoacuity tests.
    Fawcett SL
    J AAPOS; 2005 Dec; 9(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 16414526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the INNOVA Visual Acuity System Stereotest with the Frisby-Davis 2 Stereotest for the Evaluation of Distance Stereoacuity.
    Singman EL; Matta NS; Silbert DI; Tian J
    Binocul Vis Strabolog Q Simms Romano; 2013; 28(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 23822912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ASTEROID stereotest v1.0: lower stereo thresholds using smaller, denser and faster dots.
    Read JCA; Wong ZY; Yek X; Wong YX; Bachtoula O; Llamas-Cornejo I; Serrano-Pedraza I
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2020 Nov; 40(6):815-827. PubMed ID: 32989799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical Assessment of Stereoacuity and 3-D Stereoscopic Entertainment.
    Tidbury LP; Black RH; O'Connor AR
    Strabismus; 2015; 23(4):164-9. PubMed ID: 26669421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative analysis of the Lang Stereopad in a non-clinic population.
    Rowe FJ; Hepworth LR; Howard C; Chean CS; Mistry M
    Strabismus; 2019 Sep; 27(3):182-190. PubMed ID: 31329020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating distance stereoacuity in children 4-17 years of age with a novel digital application.
    Barnett-Itzhaki G; Barnett-Itzhaki Z; Ela-Dalman N; Mezad-Koursh D
    J AAPOS; 2024 Jun; 28(3):103904. PubMed ID: 38552945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating stereoacuity with 3D shutter glasses technology.
    Wu H; Jin H; Sun Y; Wang Y; Ge M; Chen Y; Chi Y
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 16(1):45. PubMed ID: 27112418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.