325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28994465)
1. Impact of PET/CT system, reconstruction protocol, data analysis method, and repositioning on PET/CT precision: An experimental evaluation using an oncology and brain phantom.
Mansor S; Pfaehler E; Heijtel D; Lodge MA; Boellaard R; Yaqub M
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6413-6424. PubMed ID: 28994465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EARL compliance and imaging optimisation on the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT using phantom and clinical data.
van Sluis J; van Snick JH; Brouwers AH; Noordzij W; Dierckx RAJO; Borra RJH; Slart RHJA; Lammertsma AA; Glaudemans AWJM; Boellaard R; Tsoumpas C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Nov; 49(13):4652-4660. PubMed ID: 35876867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT.
Doot RK; Scheuermann JS; Christian PE; Karp JS; Kinahan PE
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6035-46. PubMed ID: 21158315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PET NEMA IQ Phantom dataset: image reconstruction settings for quantitative PET imaging.
Vosoughi H; Hajizadeh M; Emami F; Momennezhad M; Geramifar P
Data Brief; 2021 Aug; 37():107231. PubMed ID: 34195308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of Statistical Fluctuation on Reproducibility and Accuracy of SUVmax and SUVpeak: A Phantom Study.
Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishida H; Nishio T; Ohnishi A; Maebatake A; Sasaki M; Senda M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Sep; 43(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 26271802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Standardized Uptake Values of
Tlostanova MS; Chipiga LA
Sovrem Tekhnologii Med; 2021; 13(3):15-23. PubMed ID: 34603751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction.
Carlier T; Willowson KP; Fourkal E; Bailey DL; Doss M; Conti M
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Point-Spread Function Modeling on PET Image Quality in Integrated PET/MR Hybrid Imaging.
Aklan B; Oehmigen M; Beiderwellen K; Ruhlmann M; Paulus DH; Jakoby BW; Ritt P; Quick HH
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 57(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 26471697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving the detection of small lesions using a state-of-the-art time-of-flight PET/CT system and small-voxel reconstructions.
Koopman D; van Dalen JA; Lagerweij MC; Arkies H; de Boer J; Oostdijk AH; Slump CH; Jager PL
J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Mar; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25613334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiotracer dose reduction in integrated PET/MR: implications from national electrical manufacturers association phantom studies.
Oehmigen M; Ziegler S; Jakoby BW; Georgi JC; Paulus DH; Quick HH
J Nucl Med; 2014 Aug; 55(8):1361-7. PubMed ID: 25006216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimization of image reconstruction conditions with phantoms for brain FDG and amyloid PET imaging.
Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishio T; Nishida H; Ohnishi A; Aita K; Sasaki M; Sasaki M; Senda M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 30(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 26337533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability of Quantitative
Jansen BHE; Cysouw MCF; Vis AN; van Moorselaar RJA; Voortman J; Bodar YJL; Schober PR; Hendrikse NH; Hoekstra OS; Boellaard R; Oprea-Lager DE
J Nucl Med; 2020 Sep; 61(9):1320-1325. PubMed ID: 31924729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification accuracy of neuro-oncology PET data as a function of emission scan duration in PET/MR compared to PET/CT.
Wampl S; Rausch I; Traub-Weidinger T; Beyer T; Gröschl M; Cal-González J
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 95():257-264. PubMed ID: 28987677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeatability of Quantitative 18F-Fluoromethylcholine PET/CT Studies in Prostate Cancer.
Oprea-Lager DE; Kramer G; van de Ven PM; van den Eertwegh AJ; van Moorselaar RJ; Schober P; Hoekstra OS; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2016 May; 57(5):721-7. PubMed ID: 26697964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of count-based image reconstruction to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured standardised uptake values.
Kaneta T; Daisaki H; Ogawa M; Liu ET; Iizuka H; Arisawa T; Hino-Shishikura A; Yoshida K; Inoue T
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192549. PubMed ID: 29432459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Brain PET imaging optimization with time of flight and point spread function modelling.
Prieto E; Martí-Climent JM; Morán V; Sancho L; Barbés B; Arbizu J; Richter JA
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 26249138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. NEMA image quality phantom measurements and attenuation correction in integrated PET/MR hybrid imaging.
Ziegler S; Jakoby BW; Braun H; Paulus DH; Quick HH
EJNMMI Phys; 2015 Dec; 2(1):18. PubMed ID: 26501819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of image reconstruction method on dose distributions derived from
Hou X; Ma H; Esquinas PL; Uribe C; Tolhurst S; Bénard F; Liu D; Rahmim A; Celler A
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(21):215022. PubMed ID: 33245057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Harmonization of standardized uptake values between two scanners, considering repeatability and magnitude of the values in clinical fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET settings: a phantom study.
Iizuka H; Daisaki H; Ogawa M; Yoshida K; Kaneta T
Nucl Med Commun; 2019 Aug; 40(8):857-864. PubMed ID: 31145204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
