These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28994616)

  • 1. Assessing speech perception in Swedish school-aged children: preliminary data on the Listen-Say test.
    Nakeva von Mentzer C; Sundström M; Enqvist K; Hällgren M
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Oct; 43(3):106-119. PubMed ID: 28994616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing speech perception in children with language difficulties: effects of background noise and phonetic contrast.
    Vance M; Martindale N
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2012 Feb; 14(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 22023346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Children's perception of nonnative-accented sentences in noise and quiet.
    Bent T; Atagi E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3985-93. PubMed ID: 26723352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Informational masking of speech in dyslexic children.
    Calcus A; Colin C; Deltenre P; Kolinsky R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):EL496-502. PubMed ID: 26093461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.
    Kilman L; Zekveld A; Hällgren M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2015 Apr; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in speech-in-noise perception parallel neural speech processing and attention in preschoolers.
    Thompson EC; Woodruff Carr K; White-Schwoch T; Otto-Meyer S; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():148-157. PubMed ID: 27864051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech Recognition and Parent Ratings From Auditory Development Questionnaires in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
    McCreery RW; Walker EA; Spratford M; Oleson J; Bentler R; Holte L; Roush P
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36 Suppl 1(0 1):60S-75S. PubMed ID: 26731160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visually guided auditory attention in a dynamic "cocktail-party" speech perception task: ERP evidence for age-related differences.
    Getzmann S; Wascher E
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():98-108. PubMed ID: 27825858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing speech perception in young children and relationships with language skills.
    Vance M; Rosen S; Coleman M
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(10):708-17. PubMed ID: 19863356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Children's perception of speech produced in a two-talker background.
    Baker M; Buss E; Jacks A; Taylor C; Leibold LJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 57(1):327-37. PubMed ID: 24687476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noise on, voicing off: Speech perception deficits in children with specific language impairment.
    Ziegler JC; Pech-Georgel C; George F; Lorenzi C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Nov; 110(3):362-72. PubMed ID: 21663919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Children's auditory-perceptual performance in identifying phonological contrasts among stops.
    Berti LC; Falavigna AE; Santos JB; Oliveira RA
    J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol; 2012; 24(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 23306685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of talker variability on word recognition in non-native listeners.
    van Dommelen WA; Hazan V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1690-9. PubMed ID: 22978897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results using the OPAL strategy in Mandarin speaking cochlear implant recipients.
    Vandali AE; Dawson PW; Arora K
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S74-S85. PubMed ID: 27329178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory Perception and Production of Speech Feature Contrasts by Pediatric Implant Users.
    Mahshie J; Core C; Larsen MD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):653-63. PubMed ID: 26035142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing auditory capabilities in young children.
    Eisenberg LS; Martinez AS; Boothroyd A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1339-50. PubMed ID: 17604127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Phoneme Identification Test for Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Discrimination Skills in Children: Development, Normative Data, and Test-Retest Reliability Studies.
    Cameron S; Chong-White N; Mealings K; Beechey T; Dillon H; Young T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):135-150. PubMed ID: 29401061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recognition memory in noise for speech of varying intelligibility.
    Gilbert RC; Chandrasekaran B; Smiljanic R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):389-99. PubMed ID: 24437779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.