These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28994795)

  • 1. A Method to Estimate Cadaveric Femur Cortical Strains During Fracture Testing Using Digital Image Correlation.
    Rossman T; Uthamaraj S; Rezaei A; McEligot S; Giambini H; Jasiuk I; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L; Dragomir-Daescu D
    J Vis Exp; 2017 Sep; (127):. PubMed ID: 28994795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proximal Cadaveric Femur Preparation for Fracture Strength Testing and Quantitative CT-based Finite Element Analysis.
    Dragomir-Daescu D; Rezaei A; Uthamaraj S; Rossman T; Bronk JT; Bolander M; Lambert V; McEligot S; Entwistle R; Giambini H; Jasiuk I; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L
    J Vis Exp; 2017 Mar; (121):. PubMed ID: 28362373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study.
    Miura M; Nakamura J; Matsuura Y; Wako Y; Suzuki T; Hagiwara S; Orita S; Inage K; Kawarai Y; Sugano M; Nawata K; Ohtori S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Dec; 18(1):536. PubMed ID: 29246133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repeatability of digital image correlation for measurement of surface strains in composite long bones.
    Väänänen SP; Amin Yavari S; Weinans H; Zadpoor AA; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    J Biomech; 2013 Jul; 46(11):1928-32. PubMed ID: 23791085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Location of atypical femoral fracture can be determined by tensile stress distribution influenced by femoral bowing and neck-shaft angle: a CT-based nonlinear finite element analysis model for the assessment of femoral shaft loading stress.
    Oh Y; Fujita K; Wakabayashi Y; Kurosa Y; Okawa A
    Injury; 2017 Dec; 48(12):2736-2743. PubMed ID: 28982480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions.
    Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsumoto T; Ohashi S; Matsuyama J; Tobita K; Kaneko M; Nakamura K
    Bone; 2009 Aug; 45(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 19398043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
    Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a balanced experimental-computational approach to understanding the mechanics of proximal femur fractures.
    Helgason B; Gilchrist S; Ariza O; Chak JD; Zheng G; Widmer RP; Ferguson SJ; Guy P; Cripton PA
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jun; 36(6):793-9. PubMed ID: 24629624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Specimen-specific modeling of hip fracture pattern and repair.
    Ali AA; Cristofolini L; Schileo E; Hu H; Taddei F; Kim RH; Rullkoetter PJ; Laz PJ
    J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(2):536-43. PubMed ID: 24275435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis predictions of femoral strength and stiffness depend on computed tomography settings.
    Dragomir-Daescu D; Salas C; Uthamaraj S; Rossman T
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 25442008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lateral Cortical Thickening and Bone Heterogeneity of the Subtrochanteric Femur Measured With Quantitative CT as Indicators for Early Detection of Atypical Femoral Fractures in Long-Term Bisphosphonate Users.
    Lee SH; Lee YH; Suh JS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):867-873. PubMed ID: 28796551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are DXA/aBMD and QCT/FEA Stiffness and Strength Estimates Sensitive to Sex and Age?
    Rezaei A; Giambini H; Rossman T; Carlson KD; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L; Dragomir-Daescu D
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Dec; 45(12):2847-2856. PubMed ID: 28940110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linking multiscale deformation to microstructure in cortical bone using in situ loading, digital image correlation and synchrotron X-ray scattering.
    Gustafsson A; Mathavan N; Turunen MJ; Engqvist J; Khayyeri H; Hall SA; Isaksson H
    Acta Biomater; 2018 Mar; 69():323-331. PubMed ID: 29410089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental validation of finite element model for proximal composite femur using optical measurements.
    Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Amin Yavari S; Weinans H; Jurvelin JS; Zadpoor AA; Isaksson H
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 May; 21():86-94. PubMed ID: 23510970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of stress variations in single-stance and sideways fall using image-based finite element analysis.
    Faisal TR; Luo Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2016 May; 27(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 27175463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Full-field strain measurement during mechanical testing of the human femur at physiologically relevant strain rates.
    Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Yavari SA; Jurvelin JS; Weinans H; Ristinmaa M; Zadpoor AA; Isaksson H
    J Biomech Eng; 2014 Nov; 136(11):. PubMed ID: 25162941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ct-based finite element models can be used to estimate experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur.
    Koivumäki JE; Thevenot J; Pulkkinen P; Kuhn V; Link TM; Eckstein F; Jämsä T
    Bone; 2012 Apr; 50(4):824-9. PubMed ID: 22306697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of strength and failure pattern of human proximal femur using quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-based finite element method.
    Mirzaei M; Keshavarzian M; Naeini V
    Bone; 2014 Jul; 64():108-14. PubMed ID: 24735974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of non-invasive assessments of strength of the proximal femur.
    Johannesdottir F; Thrall E; Muller J; Keaveny TM; Kopperdahl DL; Bouxsein ML
    Bone; 2017 Dec; 105():93-102. PubMed ID: 28739416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New QCT analysis approach shows the importance of fall orientation on femoral neck strength.
    Carpenter RD; Beaupré GS; Lang TF; Orwoll ES; Carter DR;
    J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Sep; 20(9):1533-42. PubMed ID: 16059625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.