These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28994795)

  • 21. QCT of the proximal femur--which parameters should be measured to discriminate hip fracture?
    Museyko O; Bousson V; Adams J; Laredo J-; Engelke K
    Osteoporos Int; 2016 Mar; 27(3):1137-1147. PubMed ID: 26415934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Time-elapsed synchrotron-light microstructural imaging of femoral neck fracture.
    Martelli S; Perilli E
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Aug; 84():265-272. PubMed ID: 29852314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vivo discrimination of hip fracture with quantitative computed tomography: results from the prospective European Femur Fracture Study (EFFECT).
    Bousson VD; Adams J; Engelke K; Aout M; Cohen-Solal M; Bergot C; Haguenauer D; Goldberg D; Champion K; Aksouh R; Vicaut E; Laredo JD
    J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Apr; 26(4):881-93. PubMed ID: 20939025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mapping anisotropy improves QCT-based finite element estimation of hip strength in pooled stance and side-fall load configurations.
    Panyasantisuk J; Dall'Ara E; Pretterklieber M; Pahr DH; Zysset PK
    Med Eng Phys; 2018 Sep; 59():36-42. PubMed ID: 30131112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fracture healing in mice lacking Pten in osteoblasts: a micro-computed tomography image-based analysis of the mechanical properties of the femur.
    Collins CJ; Vivanco JF; Sokn SA; Williams BO; Burgers TA; Ploeg HL
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(2):310-7. PubMed ID: 25498366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
    Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mapping anisotropy of the proximal femur for enhanced image based finite element analysis.
    Enns-Bray WS; Owoc JS; Nishiyama KK; Boyd SK
    J Biomech; 2014 Oct; 47(13):3272-8. PubMed ID: 25219361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part I--Linear analysis.
    Lotz JC; Cheal EJ; Hayes WC
    J Biomech Eng; 1991 Nov; 113(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 1762430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of femoral external shape on internal architecture and fracture risk.
    Villette CC; Zhang J; Phillips ATM
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Aug; 19(4):1251-1261. PubMed ID: 31705336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A robust 3D finite element simulation of human proximal femur progressive fracture under stance load with experimental validation.
    Hambli R; Allaoui S
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2013 Dec; 41(12):2515-27. PubMed ID: 23864338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of boundary conditions, impact loading and hydraulic stiffening on femoral fracture strength.
    Haider IT; Speirs AD; Frei H
    J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(13):2115-21. PubMed ID: 23906770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Femoral strength can be predicted from 2D projections using a 3D statistical deformation and texture model with finite element analysis.
    Steiner L; Synek A; Pahr DH
    Med Eng Phys; 2021 Jul; 93():72-82. PubMed ID: 34154777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Morphology based anisotropic finite element models of the proximal femur validated with experimental data.
    Enns-Bray WS; Ariza O; Gilchrist S; Widmer Soyka RP; Vogt PJ; Palsson H; Boyd SK; Guy P; Cripton PA; Ferguson SJ; Helgason B
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 Nov; 38(11):1339-1347. PubMed ID: 27641660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Femoral fracture load and fracture pattern is accurately predicted using a gradient-enhanced quasi-brittle finite element model.
    Haider IT; Goldak J; Frei H
    Med Eng Phys; 2018 May; 55():1-8. PubMed ID: 29551293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of measurement of femoral anteversion in femoral shaft fractures using a computer imaging software: a cadaveric study.
    Stübig T; Min W; Arvani M; Hawi N; Krettek C; Citak M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 May; 132(5):613-6. PubMed ID: 22200903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Finite element analysis of the femoral diaphysis of fresh-frozen cadavers with computed tomography and mechanical testing.
    Wako Y; Nakamura J; Matsuura Y; Suzuki T; Hagiwara S; Miura M; Kawarai Y; Sugano M; Nawata K; Yoshino K; Orita S; Inage K; Ohtori S
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Jul; 13(1):192. PubMed ID: 30064512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automatic recognition of pertrochanteric bone fractures in femur using level sets.
    Ling Wang ; Hong Cheng ; Hai Lan ; Yingjie Zheng ; Kainan Li
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():3851-3854. PubMed ID: 28269126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prediction of femoral strength using 3D finite element models reconstructed from DXA images: validation against experiments.
    Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Ristinmaa M; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Jun; 16(3):989-1000. PubMed ID: 28004226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. QCT/FEA predictions of femoral stiffness are strongly affected by boundary condition modeling.
    Rossman T; Kushvaha V; Dragomir-Daescu D
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016; 19(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 25804260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prediction of Hip Failure Load: In Vitro Study of 80 Femurs Using Three Imaging Methods and Finite Element Models-The European Fracture Study (EFFECT).
    Pottecher P; Engelke K; Duchemin L; Museyko O; Moser T; Mitton D; Vicaut E; Adams J; Skalli W; Laredo JD; Bousson V
    Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):837-47. PubMed ID: 27077380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.