200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29016505)
1. Implementing a Systematic Approach to Reduce Cesarean Birth Rates in Nulliparous Women.
Bell AD; Joy S; Gullo S; Higgins R; Stevenson E
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):1082-1089. PubMed ID: 29016505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of recommended changes in labor management for prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.
Thuillier C; Roy S; Peyronnet V; Quibel T; Nlandu A; Rozenberg P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 218(3):341.e1-341.e9. PubMed ID: 29291413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing hospital differences in low-risk cesarean delivery metrics in Florida.
Obure R; Reid CN; Salemi JL; Rubio E; Louis J; Sappenfield WM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 229(6):684.e1-684.e9. PubMed ID: 37321284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety Assessment of a Large-Scale Improvement Collaborative to Reduce Nulliparous Cesarean Delivery Rates.
Main EK; Chang SC; Cape V; Sakowski C; Smith H; Vasher J
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):613-623. PubMed ID: 30870288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of an Interdisciplinary Practice Bundle for Second-Stage Labor on Clinical Outcomes.
Garpiel SJ
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2018; 43(4):184-194. PubMed ID: 29634578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association between provider type and cesarean birth in healthy nulliparous laboring women: A retrospective cohort study.
Carlson NS; Corwin EJ; Hernandez TL; Holt E; Lowe NK; Hurt KJ
Birth; 2018 Jun; 45(2):159-168. PubMed ID: 29388247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduction in Cesarean Delivery Rates Associated With a State Quality Collaborative in Maryland.
Callaghan-Koru JA; DiPietro B; Wahid I; Mark K; Burke AB; Curran G; Creanga AA
Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 138(4):583-592. PubMed ID: 34623072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Zipori Y; Grunwald O; Ginsberg Y; Beloosesky R; Weiner Z
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 220(2):191.e1-191.e7. PubMed ID: 30616966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines.
Gimovsky AC; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):361.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26928148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reduction in the Cesarean Delivery Rate After Obstetric Care Consensus Guideline Implementation.
Wilson-Leedy JG; DiSilvestro AJ; Repke JT; Pauli JM
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; 128(1):145-152. PubMed ID: 27275806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The REDUCED trial: a cluster randomized trial for REDucing the utilization of CEsarean delivery for dystocia.
Wood S; Skiffington J; Brant R; Crawford S; Hicks M; Mohammad K; Mrklas KJ; Tang S; Metcalfe A;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 May; 228(5S):S1095-S1103. PubMed ID: 37164490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Study protocol: the Labor Progression Study, LAPS - does the use of a dynamic progression guideline in labor reduce the rate of intrapartum cesarean sections in nulliparous women? A multicenter, cluster randomized trial in Norway.
Bernitz S; Dalbye R; Øian P; Zhang J; Eggebø TM; Blix E
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Nov; 17(1):370. PubMed ID: 29132336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study.
Burke N; Burke G; Breathnach F; McAuliffe F; Morrison JJ; Turner M; Dornan S; Higgins JR; Cotter A; Geary M; McParland P; Daly S; Cody F; Dicker P; Tully E; Malone FD;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 216(6):598.e1-598.e11. PubMed ID: 28213060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variation in the Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Cesarean Delivery Rate.
Pasko DN; McGee P; Grobman WA; Bailit JL; Reddy UM; Wapner RJ; Varner MW; Thorp JM; Leveno KJ; Caritis SN; Prasad M; Saade G; Sorokin Y; Rouse DJ; Blackwell SC; Tolosa JE;
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 131(6):1039-1048. PubMed ID: 29742665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association between vaginal birth after cesarean delivery and primary cesarean delivery rates.
Rosenstein MG; Kuppermann M; Gregorich SE; Cottrell EK; Caughey AB; Cheng YW
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Nov; 122(5):1010-1017. PubMed ID: 24104780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hospital-Level Variation in the Frequency of Cesarean Delivery Among Nulliparous Women Who Undergo Labor Induction.
Main EK; Chang SC; Cheng YW; Rosenstein MG; Lagrew DC
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 136(6):1179-1189. PubMed ID: 33156193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevalence of Prolonged Latent Phase and Labor Outcomes: Review of Birth Records in a Swedish Population.
Ängeby K; Wilde-Larsson B; Hildingsson I; Sandin-Bojö AK
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2018 Jan; 63(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 29419927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intravenous fluid rate for reduction of cesarean delivery rate in nulliparous women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ehsanipoor RM; Saccone G; Seligman NS; Pierce-Williams RAM; Ciardulli A; Berghella V
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Jul; 96(7):804-811. PubMed ID: 28236651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is there a useful cesarean birth measure? Assessment of the nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean birth rate as a tool for obstetric quality improvement.
Main EK; Moore D; Farrell B; Schimmel LD; Altman RJ; Abrahams C; Bliss MC; Polivy L; Sterling J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 194(6):1644-51; discussion 1651-2. PubMed ID: 16643812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
