These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29016727)

  • 1. Soft tissue treatment changes with fixed functional appliances and with maxillary premolar extraction in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients.
    Janson G; Castello Branco N; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Henriques JFC; de Morais JF
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Apr; 40(2):214-222. PubMed ID: 29016727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cephalometric changes in Class II division 1 patients treated with two maxillary premolars extraction.
    Seben MP; Valarelli FP; de Freitas KM; Cançado RH; Bittencourt Neto AC
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(4):61-9. PubMed ID: 24262418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.
    de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Soft-tissue treatment changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusion with and without extraction of maxillary premolars.
    Janson G; Fuziy A; de Freitas MR; Castanha Henriques JF; de Almeida RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):729.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18068588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance or two maxillary premolar extractions and edgewise appliances [corrected].
    Pinzan-Vercelino CR; Janson G; Pinzan A; de Almeida RR; de Freitas MR; de Freitas KM
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 19395372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with nonextraction or with two maxillary premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Simão TM; Barros SE; Janson M; de Freitas MR
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 21490991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft tissue effects of three different Class II/1-camouflage treatment strategies.
    Atik E; Akarsu-Guven B; Kocadereli I
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Mar; 78(2):153-165. PubMed ID: 28084515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment times of Class II malocclusion: four premolar and non-extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Valarelli DP; Valarelli FP; de Freitas MR
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 21393372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overjet, overbite, and anterior crowding relapses in extraction and nonextraction patients, and their correlations.
    Francisconi MF; Janson G; Freitas KM; Oliveira RC; Oliveira RC; Freitas MR; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 24975000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Occlusal and cephalometric Class II Division 1 malocclusion severity in patients treated with and without extraction of 2 maxillary premolars.
    Janson G; Graciano JT; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; Pinzan-Vercelino CR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):759-67. PubMed ID: 16769494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes with the cervical headgear and Jones Jig followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.
    Fontes FPH; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del-Castillo A; Patel MP; Freitas MR; Henriques JFC; Janson G
    Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):424-435. PubMed ID: 32278665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mini-implants vs fixed functional appliances for treatment of young adult Class II female patients: a prospective clinical trial.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Uribe F; Nanda R
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Mar; 82(2):294-303. PubMed ID: 21867432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Janson M; Nakamura A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):861-8. PubMed ID: 18538250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes in class II subdivision treatment with asymmetric extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Lenza EB; Francisco R; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Garib D; Lenza MA
    Prog Orthod; 2017 Dec; 18(1):39. PubMed ID: 29199373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Class II treatment efficiency in maxillary premolar extraction and nonextraction protocols.
    Janson G; Barros SE; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):490-8. PubMed ID: 17920502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maxillary sinus floor extension and posterior tooth inclination in adolescent patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with maxillary first molar extractions.
    Livas C; Halazonetis DJ; Booij JW; Pandis N; Tu YK; Katsaros C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 23561408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment.
    Rocha AD; Casteluci CEVF; Ferreira FPC; Conti AC; Almeida MR; Almeida-Pedrin RR
    Braz Oral Res; 2020; 34():e003. PubMed ID: 32022222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of treatment effects from total arch distalization using modified C-palatal plates versus maxillary premolar extraction in Class II patients with severe overjet.
    Alfawaz F; Park JH; Lee NK; Bayome M; Tai K; Ku JH; Kim Y; Kook YA
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2022 Feb; 25(1):119-127. PubMed ID: 34087028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-phase treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion with the combination of the twin-block appliance and high-pull headgear.
    Lv Y; Yan B; Wang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):246-55. PubMed ID: 22858335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.