These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29017358)

  • 1. Is there evidence for the added value and correct use of manual and automatically switching multimemory hearing devices? A scoping review.
    de Graaff F; Huysmans E; Ket JCF; Merkus P; Goverts ST; Leemans CR; Smits C
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):176-183. PubMed ID: 29017358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A systematic review of electric-acoustic stimulation: device fitting ranges, outcomes, and clinical fitting practices.
    Incerti PV; Ching TY; Cowan R
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):3-26. PubMed ID: 23539259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electroacoustic Stimulation.
    Li C; Kuhlmey M; Kim AH
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2019 Apr; 52(2):311-322. PubMed ID: 30617011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utility of bilateral acoustic hearing in combination with electrical stimulation provided by the cochlear implant.
    Plant K; Babic L
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S31-8. PubMed ID: 26987051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users.
    Marcrum SC; Picou EM; Steffens T
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing aid technology: model-based concepts and assessment.
    Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S1-S2. PubMed ID: 29338464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hearing aid technology: model-based concepts and assessment.
    Johnson EE
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S29-S30. PubMed ID: 28635502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
    Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An individualised acoustically transparent earpiece for hearing devices.
    Denk F; Hiipakka M; Kollmeier B; Ernst SMA
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S62-S70. PubMed ID: 28635506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fitting recommendations and clinical benefit associated with use of the NAL-NL2 hearing-aid prescription in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients.
    English R; Plant K; Maciejczyk M; Cowan R
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S45-50. PubMed ID: 26853233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcomes with the Kanso™ off-the-ear cochlear implant sound processor.
    Mauger SJ; Jones M; Nel E; Del Dot J
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Apr; 56(4):267-276. PubMed ID: 28067077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.
    Scheperle RA; Tejani VD; Omtvedt JK; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Oleson JJ; Ozanne MV
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():45-57. PubMed ID: 28432874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictors of health-related quality of life in adult cochlear implant recipients in South Africa.
    le Roux T; Vinck B; Butler I; Louw L; Nauta L; Schlesinger D; Swanepoel W
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Jan; 56(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 27609548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychosocial Development in 5-Year-Old Children With Hearing Loss Using Hearing Aids or Cochlear Implants.
    Wong CL; Ching TYC; Cupples L; Button L; Leigh G; Marnane V; Whitfield J; Gunnourie M; Martin L
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517710373. PubMed ID: 28752809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of alternative listening devices to conventional hearing aids in adults with hearing loss.
    Maidment DW; Barker AB; Xia J; Ferguson MA
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Oct; 57(10):721-729. PubMed ID: 30388942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of electrode impedance measures between a dexamethasone-eluting and standard Cochlear™ Contour Advance® electrode in adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Briggs R; O 'Leary S; Birman C; Plant K; English R; Dawson P; Risi F; Gavrilis J; Needham K; Cowan R
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107924. PubMed ID: 32143111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using the device-oriented subjective outcome (DOSO) scale to measure outcomes of different hearing aids.
    Xu J; Galster J; Galster E; Gruhlke A; Wolfe A
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Aug; 57(8):584-591. PubMed ID: 29621924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Virtual acoustic environments for comprehensive evaluation of model-based hearing devices.
    Grimm G; Luberadzka J; Hohmann V
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S112-S117. PubMed ID: 27813439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a "direct-comparison" approach to automatic switching in omnidirectional/directional hearing aids.
    Summers V; Grant KW; Walden BE; Cord MT; Surr RK; Elhilali M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Oct; 19(9):708-20. PubMed ID: 19418710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.