These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29017637)

  • 1. Intimate Terrorism and Situational Couple Violence: Classification Variability Across Five Methods to Distinguish Johnson's Violent Relationship Types.
    Eckstein JJ
    Violence Vict; 2017 Dec; 32(6):955-976. PubMed ID: 29017637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extending Johnson's Typology: Additional Manifestations of Dating Violence and Coercive Control.
    Conroy NE; Crowley CG
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 Aug; 37(15-16):NP13315-NP13341. PubMed ID: 33825588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perpetrator Risk Markers for Intimate Terrorism and Situational Couple Violence: A Meta-Analysis.
    Love HA; Spencer CM; May SA; Mendez M; Stith SM
    Trauma Violence Abuse; 2020 Dec; 21(5):922-931. PubMed ID: 30407149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of Intimate Terrorism, Situational Couple Violence, and Mutual Violent Control on Male Victims.
    Hines DA; Douglas EM
    Psychol Men Masc; 2018 Oct; 19(4):612-623. PubMed ID: 30524210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does the situational couple violence- intimate terrorism typology explain cohabitors' high risk of intimate partner violence?
    Brownridge DA
    J Interpers Violence; 2010 Jul; 25(7):1264-83. PubMed ID: 19729674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do Substance Use, Psychosocial Adjustment, and Sexual Experiences Vary for Dating Violence Victims Based on Type of Violent Relationships?
    Zweig JM; Yahner J; Dank M; Lachman P
    J Sch Health; 2016 Dec; 86(12):882-887. PubMed ID: 27866389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intimate Terrorism by Women Towards Men: Does it Exist?
    Hines DA; Douglas EM
    J Aggress Confl Peace Res; 2010 Jul; 2(3):36-56. PubMed ID: 21165167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extending Johnson's intimate partner violence typology: lessons from an adolescent sample.
    Messinger AM; Fry DA; Rickert VI; Catallozzi M; Davidson LL
    Violence Against Women; 2014 Aug; 20(8):948-71. PubMed ID: 25125494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring coercive control: what can we learn from national population surveys?
    Myhill A
    Violence Against Women; 2015 Mar; 21(3):355-75. PubMed ID: 25680801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Types of Partner Violence in Couples Affected by Incarceration: Applying Johnson's Typology to Understand the Couple-level Context for Violence.
    McKay T; Tueller S; Landwehr J; Johnson MP
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 May; 37(9-10):NP8056-NP8087. PubMed ID: 33246389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating Measures of Intimate Partner Violence Using Consensus-Based Standards of Validity.
    Alexander EF; Backes BL; Johnson MD
    Trauma Violence Abuse; 2022 Dec; 23(5):1549-1567. PubMed ID: 33969760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Maybe She Was Provoked": Exploring Gender Stereotypes About Male and Female Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence.
    Scarduzio JA; Carlyle KE; Harris KL; Savage MW
    Violence Against Women; 2017 Jan; 23(1):89-113. PubMed ID: 27020376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Forensic analysis of the socio-economic profile of women victims of domestic violence in the region of Liège according to the seriousness of the injuries suffered].
    Clessens A; Partoune A; Garcet S; Boxho P
    Rev Med Liege; 2021 Mar; 76(3):173-178. PubMed ID: 33682386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward a Standard Approach to Operationalizing Coercive Control and Classifying Violence Types.
    Hardesty JL; Crossman KA; Haselschwerdt ML; Raffaelli M; Ogolsky BG; Johnson MP
    J Marriage Fam; 2015 Aug; 77(4):833-843. PubMed ID: 26339101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conflict and control: gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence.
    Johnson MP
    Violence Against Women; 2006 Nov; 12(11):1003-18. PubMed ID: 17043363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Qualitative Examination of Situational Risk Recognition Among Female Victims of Physical Intimate Partner Violence.
    Sherrill AM; Bell KM; Wyngarden N
    Violence Against Women; 2016 Jul; 22(8):966-85. PubMed ID: 26620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intimate Partner Violence in Men Voluntarily Attending Treatment: A Study of Couple Agreement.
    Strandmoen JF; Askeland IR; Tjersland OA; Wentzel-Larsen T; Heir T
    Violence Vict; 2016; 31(1):124-34. PubMed ID: 26646683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intimate terrorism and common couple violence. A test of Johnson's predictions in four British samples.
    Graham-Kevan N; Archer J
    J Interpers Violence; 2003 Nov; 18(11):1247-70. PubMed ID: 19774764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examining men as victims of intimate partner violence in a French forensic department.
    Dumont N; Martrille L; Albuisson E; Baland-Peltre K; Marchand E
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Aug; 337():111368. PubMed ID: 35809544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intimate terrorism and situational couple violence in general surveys: ex-spouses required.
    Johnson MP; Leone JM; Xu Y
    Violence Against Women; 2014 Feb; 20(2):186-207. PubMed ID: 24504325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.