190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29017921)
1. Supervised machine learning techniques to predict binding affinity. A study for cyclin-dependent kinase 2.
de Ávila MB; Xavier MM; Pintro VO; de Azevedo WF
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2017 Dec; 494(1-2):305-310. PubMed ID: 29017921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Binding Affinity for Drug Targets: A Study of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2.
Bitencourt-Ferreira G; Duarte da Silva A; Filgueira de Azevedo W
Curr Med Chem; 2021; 28(2):253-265. PubMed ID: 31729287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of a machine-learning model to predict Gibbs free energy of binding for protein-ligand complexes.
Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Azevedo WF
Biophys Chem; 2018 Sep; 240():63-69. PubMed ID: 29906639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computational Prediction of Binding Affinity for CDK2-ligand Complexes. A Protein Target for Cancer Drug Discovery.
Veit-Acosta M; de Azevedo Junior WF
Curr Med Chem; 2022; 29(14):2438-2455. PubMed ID: 34365938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
Brylinski M
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine Learning to Predict Binding Affinity.
Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Azevedo WF
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2053():251-273. PubMed ID: 31452110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Machine Learning-Based Scoring Functions, Development and Applications with SAnDReS.
Bitencourt-Ferreira G; Rizzotto C; de Azevedo Junior WF
Curr Med Chem; 2021; 28(9):1746-1756. PubMed ID: 32410551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of CDK-targeted scoring functions for prediction of binding affinity.
Levin NMB; Pintro VO; Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Mattos BB; de Castro Silvério A; de Azevedo WF
Biophys Chem; 2018 Apr; 235():1-8. PubMed ID: 29407904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of various electrostatic potentials on docking precision against cyclin-dependent kinase 2 protein: a multiple docking approach.
Tripathi SK; Soundarya RN; Singh P; Singh SK
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2015 Feb; 85(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 24923208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Supervised Machine Learning Methods Applied to Predict Ligand- Binding Affinity.
Heck GS; Pintro VO; Pereira RR; de Ávila MB; Levin NMB; de Azevedo WF
Curr Med Chem; 2017; 24(23):2459-2470. PubMed ID: 28641555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accurate Prediction of Complex Structure and Affinity for a Flexible Protein Receptor and Its Inhibitor.
Bekker GJ; Kamiya N; Araki M; Fukuda I; Okuno Y; Nakamura H
J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jun; 13(6):2389-2399. PubMed ID: 28482660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of High-Affinity Inhibitors of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 Towards Anticancer Therapy.
Mohammad T; Batra S; Dahiya R; Baig MH; Rather IA; Dong JJ; Hassan I
Molecules; 2019 Dec; 24(24):. PubMed ID: 31847444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimized Virtual Screening Workflow: Towards Target-Based Polynomial Scoring Functions for HIV-1 Protease.
Pintro VO; de Azevedo WF
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2017; 20(9):820-827. PubMed ID: 29165067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Machine learning optimization of cross docking accuracy.
Bjerrum EJ
Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Jun; 62():133-44. PubMed ID: 27179709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring the selectivity of a ligand complex with CDK2/CDK1: a molecular dynamics simulation approach.
Tripathi SK; Singh SK; Singh P; Chellaperumal P; Reddy KK; Selvaraj C
J Mol Recognit; 2012 Oct; 25(10):504-12. PubMed ID: 22996593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The ensemble performance index: an improved measure for assessing ensemble pose prediction performance.
Korb O; McCabe P; Cole J
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Nov; 51(11):2915-9. PubMed ID: 21962010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extra precision docking, free energy calculation and molecular dynamics simulation studies of CDK2 inhibitors.
Tripathi SK; Muttineni R; Singh SK
J Theor Biol; 2013 Oct; 334():87-100. PubMed ID: 23727278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Virtual screening to enrich a compound collection with CDK2 inhibitors using docking, scoring, and composite scoring models.
Cotesta S; Giordanetto F; Trosset JY; Crivori P; Kroemer RT; Stouten PF; Vulpetti A
Proteins; 2005 Sep; 60(4):629-43. PubMed ID: 16028223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Docking with GemDock.
Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Azevedo WF
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2053():169-188. PubMed ID: 31452105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Structure-based discovery and optimization of potential cancer therapeutics targeting the cell cycle.
Thomas MP; McInnes C
IDrugs; 2006 Apr; 9(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 16596481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
