843 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29019028)
1. Application of a full model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in 80 kVp ultra-low-dose paranasal sinus CT imaging of pediatric patients.
Sun J; Zhang Q; Duan X; Zhang C; Wang P; Jia C; Liu Y; Peng Y
Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 29019028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality.
Yanagawa M; Gyobu T; Leung AN; Kawai M; Kawata Y; Sumikawa H; Honda O; Tomiyama N
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the image qualities of filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction for CT venography at 80 kVp.
Kim JH; Choo KS; Moon TY; Lee JW; Jeon UB; Kim TU; Hwang JY; Yun MJ; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2055-63. PubMed ID: 26486938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image quality assessment of standard- and low-dose chest CT using filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and novel model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms.
Vardhanabhuti V; Loader RJ; Mitchell GR; Riordan RD; Roobottom CA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):545-52. PubMed ID: 23436843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of low-dose paranasal sinus CT imaging using a new deep learning image reconstruction technique in children compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASiR-V).
Li Y; Liu X; Zhuang XH; Wang MJ; Song XF
BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Jun; 22(1):106. PubMed ID: 35658908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image quality improvement using model-based iterative reconstruction in low dose chest CT for children with necrotizing pneumonia.
Sun J; Yu T; Liu J; Duan X; Hu D; Liu Y; Peng Y
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Mar; 17(1):24. PubMed ID: 28302073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving image quality with model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm for chest CT in children with reduced contrast concentration.
Sun J; Hu D; Shen Y; Yang H; Chen C; Yin J; Peng Y
Radiol Med; 2019 Jul; 124(7):595-601. PubMed ID: 30739289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image quality of CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease: comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Son SS; Choo KS; Jeon UB; Jeon GR; Nam KJ; Kim TU; Yeom JA; Hwang JY; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():31-8. PubMed ID: 25414055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Ichikawa Y; Kitagawa K; Nagasawa N; Murashima S; Sakuma H
BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Aug; 13():27. PubMed ID: 23927627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Model-based iterative reconstruction compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection in CT of the kidneys and the adjacent retroperitoneum.
Olcott EW; Shin LK; Sommer G; Chan I; Rosenberg J; Molvin FL; Boas FE; Fleischmann D
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):774-84. PubMed ID: 24809318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA
Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose reduction in CT urography and vasculature phantom studies using model-based iterative reconstruction.
Page L; Wei W; Kundra V; Rong XJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):334-342. PubMed ID: 27929506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT Dose Reduction for Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurement: Effects of Model-Based and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstructions and Filtered Back Projection.
Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Niijima Y; Hashimoto M; Yamada M; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):W677-83. PubMed ID: 26001256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Iterative Reconstructions in Reduced-Dose CT: Which Type Ensures Diagnostic Image Quality in Young Oncology Patients?
Pauchard B; Higashigaito K; Lamri-Senouci A; Knebel JF; Berthold D; Verdun FR; Alkadhi H; Schmidt S
Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1114-1124. PubMed ID: 28365232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing the radiation dose for low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuses using iterative reconstruction: feasibility and image quality.
Bulla S; Blanke P; Hassepass F; Krauss T; Winterer JT; Breunig C; Langer M; Pache G
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2246-50. PubMed ID: 21664084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
