BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29019671)

  • 1. Deep Learning Based Regression and Multiclass Models for Acute Oral Toxicity Prediction with Automatic Chemical Feature Extraction.
    Xu Y; Pei J; Lai L
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Nov; 57(11):2672-2685. PubMed ID: 29019671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of Human Cytochrome P450 Inhibition Using a Multitask Deep Autoencoder Neural Network.
    Li X; Xu Y; Lai L; Pei J
    Mol Pharm; 2018 Oct; 15(10):4336-4345. PubMed ID: 29775322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In silico prediction of chemical acute oral toxicity using multi-classification methods.
    Li X; Chen L; Cheng F; Wu Z; Bian H; Xu C; Li W; Liu G; Shen X; Tang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Apr; 54(4):1061-9. PubMed ID: 24735213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing Acute Oral Toxicity Predictions by using Consensus Modeling and Algebraic Form-Based 0D-to-2D Molecular Encodes.
    García-Jacas CR; Marrero-Ponce Y; Cortés-Guzmán F; Suárez-Lezcano J; Martinez-Rios FO; García-González LA; Pupo-Meriño M; Martinez-Mayorga K
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):1178-1192. PubMed ID: 31066547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ADMET evaluation in drug discovery: 15. Accurate prediction of rat oral acute toxicity using relevance vector machine and consensus modeling.
    Lei T; Li Y; Song Y; Li D; Sun H; Hou T
    J Cheminform; 2016; 8():6. PubMed ID: 26839598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative Toxicity Prediction Using Topology Based Multitask Deep Neural Networks.
    Wu K; Wei GW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Feb; 58(2):520-531. PubMed ID: 29314829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Convolutional Embedding of Attributed Molecular Graphs for Physical Property Prediction.
    Coley CW; Barzilay R; Green WH; Jaakkola TS; Jensen KF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Aug; 57(8):1757-1772. PubMed ID: 28696688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In Silico Prediction of Oral Acute Rodent Toxicity Using Consensus Machine Learning.
    Schieferdecker S; Rottach F; Vock E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Apr; 64(8):3114-3122. PubMed ID: 38498695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In Silico Prediction of Chemical Toxicity Profile Using Local Lazy Learning.
    Lu J; Zhang P; Zou XW; Zhao XQ; Cheng KG; Zhao YL; Bi Y; Zheng MY; Luo XM
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2017; 20(4):346-353. PubMed ID: 28215144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive modeling of estrogen receptor agonism, antagonism, and binding activities using machine- and deep-learning approaches.
    Ciallella HL; Russo DP; Aleksunes LM; Grimm FA; Zhu H
    Lab Invest; 2021 Apr; 101(4):490-502. PubMed ID: 32778734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deep Learning for Drug-Induced Liver Injury.
    Xu Y; Dai Z; Chen F; Gao S; Pei J; Lai L
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Oct; 55(10):2085-93. PubMed ID: 26437739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing Deep and Shallow Learning Methods for Quantitative Prediction of Acute Chemical Toxicity.
    Liu R; Madore M; Glover KP; Feasel MG; Wallqvist A
    Toxicol Sci; 2018 Aug; 164(2):512-526. PubMed ID: 29722883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved Prediction of Aqueous Solubility of Novel Compounds by Going Deeper With Deep Learning.
    Cui Q; Lu S; Ni B; Zeng X; Tan Y; Chen YD; Zhao H
    Front Oncol; 2020; 10():121. PubMed ID: 32117768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting Dose-Range Chemical Toxicity using Novel Hybrid Deep Machine-Learning Method.
    Limbu S; Zakka C; Dakshanamurthy S
    Toxics; 2022 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 36422913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of fathead minnow acute toxicity of organic compounds from molecular structure.
    Eldred DV; Weikel CL; Jurs PC; Kaiser KL
    Chem Res Toxicol; 1999 Jul; 12(7):670-8. PubMed ID: 10409408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity by machine learning approaches.
    Tan NX; Rao HB; Li ZR; Li XY
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2009; 20(1-2):27-75. PubMed ID: 19343583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Critical assessment of QSAR models of environmental toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: focusing on applicability domain and overfitting by variable selection.
    Tetko IV; Sushko I; Pandey AK; Zhu H; Tropsha A; Papa E; Oberg T; Todeschini R; Fourches D; Varnek A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1733-46. PubMed ID: 18729318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the Use of Graph Neural Networks and Transfer Learning for Oral Bioavailability Prediction.
    Ng SSS; Lu Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Aug; 63(16):5035-5044. PubMed ID: 37582507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In silico prediction of chemical aquatic toxicity by multiple machine learning and deep learning approaches.
    Xu M; Yang H; Liu G; Tang Y; Li W
    J Appl Toxicol; 2022 Nov; 42(11):1766-1776. PubMed ID: 35653511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A machine learning-based approach to prognostic analysis of thoracic transplantations.
    Delen D; Oztekin A; Kong ZJ
    Artif Intell Med; 2010 May; 49(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 20153956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.