BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29019862)

  • 1. Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.
    Erdmann-Sager J; Wilkins EG; Pusic AL; Qi J; Hamill JB; Kim HM; Guldbrandsen GE; Chun YS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Feb; 141(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 29019862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison of Four Abdominally Based Autologous Reconstruction Methods.
    Macadam SA; Zhong T; Weichman K; Papsdorf M; Lennox PA; Hazen A; Matros E; Disa J; Mehrara B; Pusic AL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):758-771. PubMed ID: 26910656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.
    Chevray PM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Immediate Unilateral Breast Reconstruction using Abdominally Based Flaps: Analysis of 3,310 Cases.
    Kwok AC; Simpson AM; Ye X; Tatro E; Agarwal JP
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2019 Jan; 35(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 30085346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Lee KT; Mun GH
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 25536199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Immediate Bilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Abdominally Based Flaps: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database.
    Holoyda KA; Simpson AM; Ye X; Agarwal JP; Kwok AC
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2019 Oct; 35(8):594-601. PubMed ID: 31075801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
    Chun YS; Sinha I; Turko A; Yueh JH; Lipsitz S; Pribaz JJ; Lee BT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 20555301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgically Treated Hernia following Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Prevalence, Outcomes, and Expenditures.
    Shubinets V; Fox JP; Sarik JR; Kovach SJ; Fischer JP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):749-757. PubMed ID: 26910655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of 2-Year Complication Rates Among Common Techniques for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.
    Bennett KG; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Pusic AL; Wilkins EG
    JAMA Surg; 2018 Oct; 153(10):901-908. PubMed ID: 29926077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effects of Perioperative Tamoxifen Therapy on Microvascular Flap Complications in Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous/Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.
    Salibian AA; Bokarius AV; Gu J; Lee Y; Wirth GA; Paydar KZ; Kobayashi MR; Evans GR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Dec; 77(6):630-634. PubMed ID: 26808759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of donor-site morbidity of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.
    Wu LC; Bajaj A; Chang DW; Chevray PM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Sep; 122(3):702-709. PubMed ID: 18766032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A cost-effectiveness analysis of DIEP vs free MS-TRAM flap for microsurgical breast reconstruction.
    Tan MG; Isaranuwatchai W; DeLyzer T; Butler K; Hofer SOP; O'Neill AC; Zhong T
    J Surg Oncol; 2019 Mar; 119(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 30562406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis of flap perfusion and donor site complications for breast reconstruction using pedicled versus free TRAM and DIEP flaps.
    Jeong W; Lee S; Kim J
    Breast; 2018 Apr; 38():45-51. PubMed ID: 29227815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Aesthetic Outcomes Between Vertical and Horizontal Flap Insets in Breast Reconstruction with the TRAM or DIEP Flaps.
    Jeong WS; Han W; Eom JS
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2017 Feb; 41(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 28032178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.
    Wan DC; Tseng CY; Anderson-Dam J; Dalio AL; Crisera CA; Festekjian JH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rezoning Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flaps Based on Perforasome Groupings and a New Understanding of the Vascular Architecture of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery-Based Flaps.
    Tan J; Ohjimi H; Takagi S; Kawakami Y; Eto A
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Dec; 83(6):e59-e67. PubMed ID: 31232810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Versus Free Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap: Complications and Resource Utilization.
    Zoghbi Y; Gerth DJ; Tashiro J; Golpanian S; Thaller SR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2017 May; 78(5):516-520. PubMed ID: 28052051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preoperative computed tomography angiogram to predict patients with favorable anatomy for superficial inferior epigastric artery flap breast reconstruction.
    Piorkowski JR; DeRosier LC; Nickerson P; Fix RJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2011 May; 66(5):534-6. PubMed ID: 21407054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: part I. unilateral reconstruction.
    Selber JC; Nelson J; Fosnot J; Goldstein J; Bergey M; Sonnad SS; Serletti JM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1142-1153. PubMed ID: 20885239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of microvascular breast reconstruction: Cost equivalence of TRAM and DIEP flaps implications in the era of CMS reforms.
    Foppiani JA; Hernandez Alvarez A; Kim EJ; Escobar-Domingo MJ; Taritsa IC; Schuster KA; Lee D; Ho OA; Rinker B; Lee BT; Lin SJ
    Microsurgery; 2024 May; 44(4):e31185. PubMed ID: 38716656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.