These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29020138)

  • 21. An overview of the objectives of and the approaches to propensity score analyses.
    Heinze G; Jüni P
    Eur Heart J; 2011 Jul; 32(14):1704-8. PubMed ID: 21362706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Propensity score methods gave similar results to traditional regression modeling in observational studies: a systematic review.
    Shah BR; Laupacis A; Hux JE; Austin PC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 58(6):550-9. PubMed ID: 15878468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Unifying instrumental variable and inverse probability weighting approaches for inference of causal treatment effect and unmeasured confounding in observational studies.
    Liu T; Hogan JW
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Mar; 30(3):671-686. PubMed ID: 33213292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimating exposure effects by modelling the expectation of exposure conditional on confounders.
    Robins JM; Mark SD; Newey WK
    Biometrics; 1992 Jun; 48(2):479-95. PubMed ID: 1637973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On a preference-based instrumental variable approach in reducing unmeasured confounding-by-indication.
    Li Y; Lee Y; Wolfe RA; Morgenstern H; Zhang J; Port FK; Robinson BM
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1150-68. PubMed ID: 25546152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Methods to assess intended effects of drug treatment in observational studies are reviewed.
    Klungel OH; Martens EP; Psaty BM; Grobbee DE; Sullivan SD; Stricker BH; Leufkens HG; de Boer A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1223-31. PubMed ID: 15617947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new weighted balance measure helped to select the variables to be included in a propensity score model.
    Caruana E; Chevret S; Resche-Rigon M; Pirracchio R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1415-22.e2. PubMed ID: 26050059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Bias in observational research: 'confounding'].
    Groenwold RH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(13):A4221. PubMed ID: 22456291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Propensity scores with misclassified treatment assignment: a likelihood-based adjustment.
    Braun D; Gorfine M; Parmigiani G; Arvold ND; Dominici F; Zigler C
    Biostatistics; 2017 Oct; 18(4):695-710. PubMed ID: 28419189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Propensity score methods for time-dependent cluster confounding.
    Cafri G; Austin PC
    Biom J; 2020 Oct; 62(6):1443-1462. PubMed ID: 32419247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimating subgroup effects using the propensity score method: a practical application in outcomes research.
    Eeren HV; Spreeuwenberg MD; Bartak A; de Rooij M; Busschbach JJ
    Med Care; 2015 Apr; 53(4):366-73. PubMed ID: 25738381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Confounder adjustment in observational comparative effectiveness researches: (2) statistical adjustment approaches for unmeasured confounders].
    Huang LL; Wei YY; Chen F
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 40(11):1450-1455. PubMed ID: 31838820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Weighted estimators of the complier average causal effect on restricted mean survival time with observed instrument-outcome confounders.
    Dharmarajan SH; Li Y; Lehmann D; Schaubel DE
    Biom J; 2021 Apr; 63(4):712-724. PubMed ID: 33346382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Causal effect of prolificacy on milk yield in dairy sheep using propensity score.
    Ferreira VC; Thomas DL; Valente BD; Rosa GJM
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Oct; 100(10):8443-8450. PubMed ID: 28780093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automatic variable selection for exposure-driven propensity score matching with unmeasured confounders.
    Zöller D; Wockner LF; Binder H
    Biom J; 2020 May; 62(3):868-884. PubMed ID: 32203625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Instruments for causal inference: an epidemiologist's dream?
    Hernán MA; Robins JM
    Epidemiology; 2006 Jul; 17(4):360-72. PubMed ID: 16755261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Combining the regression discontinuity design and propensity score-based weighting to improve causal inference in program evaluation.
    Linden A; Adams JL
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Apr; 18(2):317-25. PubMed ID: 22304484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On variance estimate for covariate adjustment by propensity score analysis.
    Zou B; Zou F; Shuster JJ; Tighe PJ; Koch GG; Zhou H
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3537-48. PubMed ID: 26999553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An application of propensity score matching using claims data.
    Seeger JD; Williams PL; Walker AM
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Jul; 14(7):465-76. PubMed ID: 15651087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Applications of the propensity score weighting method in psychogeriatric research: correcting selection bias and adjusting for confounders.
    Chang CH
    Int Psychogeriatr; 2017 May; 29(5):703-706. PubMed ID: 28095944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.