These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29021179)

  • 1. Bayesian and likelihood phylogenetic reconstructions of morphological traits are not discordant when taking uncertainty into consideration: a comment on Puttick
    Brown JW; Parins-Fukuchi C; Stull GW; Vargas OM; Smith SA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Oct; 284(1864):. PubMed ID: 29021179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertain-tree: discriminating among competing approaches to the phylogenetic analysis of phenotype data.
    Puttick MN; O'Reilly JE; Tanner AR; Fleming JF; Clark J; Holloway L; Lozano-Fernandez J; Parry LA; Tarver JE; Pisani D; Donoghue PC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Jan; 284(1846):. PubMed ID: 28077778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian methods outperform parsimony but at the expense of precision in the estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data.
    O'Reilly JE; Puttick MN; Parry L; Tanner AR; Tarver JE; Fleming J; Pisani D; Donoghue PC
    Biol Lett; 2016 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 27095266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian analysis using a simple likelihood model outperforms parsimony for estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data.
    Wright AM; Hillis DM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e109210. PubMed ID: 25279853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of maximum parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic reconstruction using empirical morphological data.
    Schrago CG; Aguiar BO; Mello B
    J Evol Biol; 2018 Oct; 31(10):1477-1484. PubMed ID: 29957887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequentist properties of Bayesian posterior probabilities of phylogenetic trees under simple and complex substitution models.
    Huelsenbeck J; Rannala B
    Syst Biol; 2004 Dec; 53(6):904-13. PubMed ID: 15764559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robustness of ancestral sequence reconstruction to phylogenetic uncertainty.
    Hanson-Smith V; Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):1988-99. PubMed ID: 20368266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unraveling the evolutionary radiation of the thoracican barnacles using molecular and morphological evidence: a comparison of several divergence time estimation approaches.
    Pérez-Losada M; Høeg JT; Crandall KA
    Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):244-64. PubMed ID: 15205051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating trees from filtered data: identifiability of models for morphological phylogenetics.
    Allman ES; Holder MT; Rhodes JA
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Mar; 263(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 20004210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How low can you go? The effects of mutation rate on the accuracy of species-tree estimation.
    Lanier HC; Huang H; Knowles LL
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Jan; 70():112-9. PubMed ID: 24060367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design.
    McCormack JE; Huang H; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 20525604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The devil in the details: interactions between the branch-length prior and likelihood model affect node support and branch lengths in the phylogeny of the Psoraceae.
    Ekman S; Blaalid R
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):541-61. PubMed ID: 21436107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nuclear introns outperform mitochondrial DNA in inter-specific phylogenetic reconstruction: Lessons from horseshoe bats (Rhinolophidae: Chiroptera).
    Dool SE; Puechmaille SJ; Foley NM; Allegrini B; Bastian A; Mutumi GL; Maluleke TG; Odendaal LJ; Teeling EC; Jacobs DS
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Apr; 97():196-212. PubMed ID: 26826601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inferring demographic parameters in bacterial genomic data using Bayesian and hybrid phylogenetic methods.
    Duchene S; Duchene DA; Geoghegan JL; Dyson ZA; Hawkey J; Holt KE
    BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):95. PubMed ID: 29914372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mapping uncertainty and phylogenetic uncertainty in ancestral character state reconstruction: an example in the moss genus Brachytheciastrum.
    Vanderpoorten A; Goffinet B
    Syst Biol; 2006 Dec; 55(6):957-71. PubMed ID: 17345677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Boolean analysis and standard phylogenetic methods using artificially evolved and natural mt-tRNA sequences from great apes.
    Ari E; Ittzés P; Podani J; Thi QC; Jakó E
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Apr; 63(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 22289866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian phylogenetic estimation of fossil ages.
    Drummond AJ; Stadler T
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2016 Jul; 371(1699):. PubMed ID: 27325827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fundamental differences between the methods of maximum likelihood and maximum posterior probability in phylogenetics.
    Svennblad B; Erixon P; Oxelman B; Britton T
    Syst Biol; 2006 Feb; 55(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 16507528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The gene tree delusion.
    Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum-likelihood inference of population genetic parameters.
    Beerli P
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 22(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 16317072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.