These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Does substrate coarseness matter for foraging ants? An experiment with Lasius niger (Hymenoptera; Formicidae). Bernadou A; Fourcassié V J Insect Physiol; 2008 Mar; 54(3):534-42. PubMed ID: 18221944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rats value time differently on equivalent foraging and delay-discounting tasks. Carter EC; Redish AD J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Sep; 145(9):1093-101. PubMed ID: 27359127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity and feeding efficiency of the black garden ant Lasius niger to sugar resources. Detrain C; Prieur J J Insect Physiol; 2014 May; 64():74-80. PubMed ID: 24667145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial discounting of food and social rewards in guppies (poecilia reticulata). Mühlhoff N; Stevens JR; Reader SM Front Psychol; 2011; 2():68. PubMed ID: 21738517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Time discounting and time preference in animals: A critical review. Hayden BY Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 26063653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monkeys are more patient in a foraging task than in a standard intertemporal choice task. Blanchard TC; Hayden BY PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117057. PubMed ID: 25671436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sugar and amino acid preference in the black garden ant Lasius niger (L.). Madsen NEL; Sørensen PB; Offenberg J J Insect Physiol; 2017 Jul; 100():140-145. PubMed ID: 28576457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Waiting by mistake: symbolic representation of rewards modulates intertemporal choice in capuchin monkeys, preschool children and adult humans. Addessi E; Bellagamba F; Delfino A; De Petrillo F; Focaroli V; Macchitella L; Maggiorelli V; Pace B; Pecora G; Rossi S; Sbaffi A; Tasselli MI; Paglieri F Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):428-41. PubMed ID: 24387915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Partner choice through concealed floral sugar rewards evolved with the specialization of ant-plant mutualisms. Chomicki G; Staedler YM; Schönenberger J; Renner SS New Phytol; 2016 Sep; 211(4):1358-70. PubMed ID: 27159681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Food transport in ants: Do Lasius niger foragers maximize their individual load? Mailleux AC; Deneubourg JL; Detrain C C R Biol; 2009 May; 332(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 19393982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bundling and segregation affect pheromone deposition, but not choice, in an ant. De Agrò M; Matschunas C; Czaczkes TJ Elife; 2022 Nov; 11():. PubMed ID: 36412093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nest and food search behaviour in desert ants, Cataglyphis: a critical comparison. Pfeffer SE; Bolek S; Wolf H; Wittlinger M Anim Cogn; 2015 Jul; 18(4):885-94. PubMed ID: 25805650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is it patience or motivation? On motivational confounds in intertemporal choice tasks. Paglieri F; Addessi E; Sbaffi A; Tasselli MI; Delfino A J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jan; 103(1):196-217. PubMed ID: 25545635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Specificity of an ant-lycaenid interaction. Jordano D; Thomas CD Oecologia; 1992 Sep; 91(3):431-438. PubMed ID: 28313553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]