These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29022153)

  • 1. Practical considerations when analyzing discrete survival times using the grouped relative risk model.
    Altman RM; Henrey A
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2018 Jul; 24(3):532-547. PubMed ID: 29022153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimators of the local false discovery rate designed for small numbers of tests.
    Padilla M; Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Oct; 11(5):4. PubMed ID: 23079518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A survival tree method for the analysis of discrete event times in clinical and epidemiological studies.
    Schmid M; Küchenhoff H; Hoerauf A; Tutz G
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(5):734-51. PubMed ID: 26358826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conditional maximum likelihood estimation in semiparametric transformation model with LTRC data.
    Chen CM; Shen PS
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2018 Apr; 24(2):250-272. PubMed ID: 28168333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The log-Burr XII regression model for grouped survival data.
    Hashimoto EM; Ortega EM; Cordeiro GM; Barreto ML
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(1):141-59. PubMed ID: 22204532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Weibull regression for lifetimes measured with error.
    Skinner CJ; Humphreys K
    Lifetime Data Anal; 1999; 5(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 10214000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parametric bootstrap and penalized quasi-likelihood inference in conditional autoregressive models.
    MacNab YC; Dean CB
    Stat Med; 2000 Sep 15-30; 19(17-18):2421-35. PubMed ID: 10960863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of Firth-and logF-type penalized methods in risk prediction for small or sparse binary data.
    Rahman MS; Sultana M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):33. PubMed ID: 28231767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Joint modeling of survival and longitudinal data: likelihood approach revisited.
    Hsieh F; Tseng YK; Wang JL
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1037-43. PubMed ID: 17156277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parametric cure models of relative and cause-specific survival for grouped survival times.
    Gamel JW; Weller EA; Wesley MN; Feuer EJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2000 Feb; 61(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 10661395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size planning of two-arm superiority and noninferiority survival studies with discrete follow-up.
    Wellek S
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(20):3123-3136. PubMed ID: 28608389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Penalized estimation for proportional hazards models with current status data.
    Lu M; Li CS
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(30):4893-4907. PubMed ID: 28872695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regression analysis of multivariate grouped survival data.
    Guo SW; Lin DY
    Biometrics; 1994 Sep; 50(3):632-9. PubMed ID: 7981390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regression analysis of discrete time survival data under heterogeneity.
    Xue X; Brookmeyer R
    Stat Med; 1997 Sep; 16(17):1983-93. PubMed ID: 9304768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A pairwise likelihood augmented Cox estimator for left-truncated data.
    Wu F; Kim S; Qin J; Saran R; Li Y
    Biometrics; 2018 Mar; 74(1):100-108. PubMed ID: 28853158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fully parametric and semi-parametric regression models for common events with covariate measurement error in main study/validation study designs.
    Spiegelman D; Casella M
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):395-409. PubMed ID: 9192443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Confidence intervals for multinomial logistic regression in sparse data.
    Bull SB; Lewinger JP; Lee SS
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):903-18. PubMed ID: 16489602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing estimation approaches for the illness-death model under left truncation and right censoring.
    Vakulenko-Lagun B; Mandel M
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1533-48. PubMed ID: 26553433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing Bias and Mean Squared Error Associated With Regression-Based Odds Ratio Estimators.
    Lyles RH; Guo Y; Greenland S
    J Stat Plan Inference; 2012 Dec; 142(12):3235-3241. PubMed ID: 22962519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias reduction in logistic dose-response models.
    Wagler A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 21442516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.