337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29023580)
1. Effects of fish movement assumptions on the design of a marine protected area to protect an overfished stock.
Cornejo-Donoso J; Einarsson B; Birnir B; Gaines SD
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186309. PubMed ID: 29023580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of marine protected areas on overfished fishing stocks with multiple stable states.
Takashina N; Mougi A
J Theor Biol; 2014 Jan; 341():64-70. PubMed ID: 24083999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sampling mobile oceanic fishes and sharks: implications for fisheries and conservation planning.
Letessier TB; Bouchet PJ; Meeuwig JJ
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 May; 92(2):627-646. PubMed ID: 26680116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Designing MPAs for food security in open-access fisheries.
Cabral RB; Halpern BS; Lester SE; White C; Gaines SD; Costello C
Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):8033. PubMed ID: 31142773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Decision analysis for designing marine protected areas for multiple species with uncertain fishery status.
White JW; Botsford LW; Moffitt EA; Fischer DT
Ecol Appl; 2010 Sep; 20(6):1523-41. PubMed ID: 20945757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Limited differences in fish and benthic communities and possible cascading effects inside and outside a protected marine area in Sagres (SW Portugal).
Gil Fernández C; Paulo D; Serrão EA; Engelen AH
Mar Environ Res; 2016 Mar; 114():12-23. PubMed ID: 26741737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Community- and government-managed marine protected areas increase fish size, biomass and potential value.
Chirico AAD; McClanahan TR; Eklöf JS
PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182342. PubMed ID: 28806740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatial, socio-economic, and ecological implications of incorporating minimum size constraints in marine protected area network design.
Metcalfe K; Vaughan G; Vaz S; Smith RJ
Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1615-25. PubMed ID: 26219669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marine protected area networks in California, USA.
Botsford LW; White JW; Carr MH; Caselle JE
Adv Mar Biol; 2014; 69():205-51. PubMed ID: 25358301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Introduction to marine managed areas.
Hilborn R
Adv Mar Biol; 2014; 69():1-13. PubMed ID: 25358296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing dispersal patterns of fish propagules from an effective mediterranean marine protected area.
Di Franco A; Coppini G; Pujolar JM; De Leo GA; Gatto M; Lyubartsev V; Melià P; Zane L; Guidetti P
PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e52108. PubMed ID: 23284887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management.
Gaines SD; White C; Carr MH; Palumbi SR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Oct; 107(43):18286-93. PubMed ID: 20200311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of protogynous sex change on recovery of fish populations within marine protected areas.
Easter EE; Adreani MS; Hamilton SL; Steele MA; Pang S; White JW
Ecol Appl; 2020 Apr; 30(3):e02070. PubMed ID: 31903628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incorporating larval dispersal into MPA design for both conservation and fisheries.
Krueck NC; Ahmadia GN; Green A; Jones GP; Possingham HP; Riginos C; Treml EA; Mumby PJ
Ecol Appl; 2017 Apr; 27(3):925-941. PubMed ID: 28039952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term effectiveness of a multi-use marine protected area on reef fish assemblages and fisheries landings.
Rife AN; Aburto-Oropeza O; Hastings PA; Erisman B; Ballantyne F; Wielgus J; Sala E; Gerber L
J Environ Manage; 2013 Mar; 117():276-83. PubMed ID: 23416447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Model-based assessment of persistence in proposed marine protected area designs.
Kaplan DM; Botsford LW; O'Farrell MR; Gaines SD; Jorgensen S
Ecol Appl; 2009 Mar; 19(2):433-48. PubMed ID: 19323201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of pre-closure fishing effort on marine protected area performance in social-ecological dimensions: Implications for developing marine conservation plans.
Li Y; Sun M; Ren Y; Chen Y
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Aug; 729():138936. PubMed ID: 32361451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Small-sized and well-enforced Marine Protected Areas provide ecological benefits for piscivorous fish populations worldwide.
Rojo I; Sánchez-Meca J; García-Charton JA
Mar Environ Res; 2019 Aug; 149():100-110. PubMed ID: 31271903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effectiveness of marine protected areas for predator and prey with varying mobility.
Pilyugin SS; Medlock J; De Leenheer P
Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Aug; 110():63-77. PubMed ID: 27151107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Organization Science improves management effectiveness of Marine Protected Areas.
Scianna C; Niccolini F; Giakoumi S; Di Franco A; Gaines SD; Bianchi CN; Scaccia L; Bava S; Cappanera V; Charbonnel E; Culioli JM; Di Carlo G; De Franco F; Dimitriadis C; Panzalis P; Santoro P; Guidetti P
J Environ Manage; 2019 Jun; 240():285-292. PubMed ID: 30952049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
