BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29023823)

  • 1. Is attention enhanced following performance errors? Testing the adaptive control hypothesis.
    Compton RJ; Heaton EC; Gaines A
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Apr; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 29023823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intertrial interval duration affects error monitoring.
    Compton RJ; Heaton E; Ozer E
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Aug; 54(8):1151-1162. PubMed ID: 28423188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orienting attention in time. Modulation of brain potentials.
    Miniussi C; Wilding EL; Coull JT; Nobre AC
    Brain; 1999 Aug; 122 ( Pt 8)():1507-18. PubMed ID: 10430834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of post-response arousal on cognitive control: Adaptive or maladaptive?
    Compton RJ; Jaskir M; Mu J
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Apr; 59(4):e13988. PubMed ID: 34904230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pre-stimulus alpha and post-stimulus N2 foreshadow imminent errors in a single task.
    Shou G; Dasari D; Ding L
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Oct; 77():346-58. PubMed ID: 26362494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Alpha power is influenced by performance errors.
    Carp J; Compton RJ
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Mar; 46(2):336-43. PubMed ID: 19207203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of the global/local probability effect on the neural processing of cues and targets. A functional systems approach.
    Arjona A; Rodríguez E; Morales M; Gómez CM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():52-61. PubMed ID: 30342061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The power of frontal midline theta and post-error slowing to predict performance recovery: Evidence for compensatory mechanisms.
    Valadez EA; Simons RF
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Apr; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 28960340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Faster, more intense! The relation between electrophysiological reflections of attentional orienting, sensory gain control, and speed of responding.
    Talsma D; Mulckhuyse M; Slagter HA; Theeuwes J
    Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1178():92-105. PubMed ID: 17931607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
    McDonald JJ; Green JJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural signatures of adaptive post-error adjustments in visual search.
    Steinhauser R; Maier ME; Steinhauser M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Apr; 150():270-278. PubMed ID: 28254452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emotional cue validity effects: The role of neurocognitive responses to emotion.
    Denefrio S; Simmons A; Jha A; Dennis-Tiwary TA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179714. PubMed ID: 28683069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fractionating the neural mechanisms of cognitive control.
    Kopp B; Tabeling S; Moschner C; Wessel K
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 18(6):949-65. PubMed ID: 16839302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stress regulation and cognitive control: evidence relating cortisol reactivity and neural responses to errors.
    Compton RJ; Hofheimer J; Kazinka R
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2013 Mar; 13(1):152-63. PubMed ID: 23055094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognitive control in the intertrial interval: evidence from EEG alpha power.
    Compton RJ; Arnstein D; Freedman G; Dainer-Best J; Liss A
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):583-90. PubMed ID: 20840195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lost in vision: ERP correlates of exogenous tactile attention when engaging in a visual task.
    Jones A; Forster B
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):675-85. PubMed ID: 23340481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Error-related brain activity and adjustments of selective attention following errors.
    Maier ME; Yeung N; Steinhauser M
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(4):2339-47. PubMed ID: 21511043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. N450 as a candidate neural marker for interference control deficits in children with learning disabilities.
    Liu C; Yao R; Wang Z; Zhou R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Jul; 93(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 24858538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An event-related potential study of supramodal attentional control and crossmodal attention effects.
    Green JJ; McDonald JJ
    Psychophysiology; 2006 Mar; 43(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 16712586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sustaining attention for a prolonged period of time increases temporal variability in cortical responses.
    Reteig LC; van den Brink RL; Prinssen S; Cohen MX; Slagter HA
    Cortex; 2019 Aug; 117():16-32. PubMed ID: 30925309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.