These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29023972)

  • 1. Covariate adjustment using propensity scores for dependent censoring problems in the accelerated failure time model.
    Cho Y; Hu C; Ghosh D
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):390-404. PubMed ID: 29023972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Weighted estimation of the accelerated failure time model in the presence of dependent censoring.
    Cho Y; Ghosh D
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0124381. PubMed ID: 25909753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Covariate adjustment via propensity scores for recurrent events in the presence of dependent censoring.
    Cho Y; Ghosh D
    Commun Stat Theory Methods; 2021; 50(1):216-236. PubMed ID: 33716388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Propensity score applied to survival data analysis through proportional hazards models: a Monte Carlo study.
    Gayat E; Resche-Rigon M; Mary JY; Porcher R
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 22411785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of moderator by confounder interactions in the assessment of treatment effect modification: a simulation study.
    Marsden AM; Dixon WG; Dunn G; Emsley R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):88. PubMed ID: 35369866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. G-estimation and artificial censoring: problems, challenges, and applications.
    Joffe MM; Yang WP; Feldman H
    Biometrics; 2012 Mar; 68(1):275-86. PubMed ID: 21950320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):734-53. PubMed ID: 16708349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Normand SL; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):754-68. PubMed ID: 16783757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On variance estimate for covariate adjustment by propensity score analysis.
    Zou B; Zou F; Shuster JJ; Tighe PJ; Koch GG; Zhou H
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3537-48. PubMed ID: 26999553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Causal inference in survival analysis using pseudo-observations.
    Andersen PK; Syriopoulou E; Parner ET
    Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(17):2669-2681. PubMed ID: 28384840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correcting for dependent censoring in routine outcome monitoring data by applying the inverse probability censoring weighted estimator.
    Willems S; Schat A; van Noorden MS; Fiocco M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):323-335. PubMed ID: 26988930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic matching for time-dependent treatments: a longitudinal extension and simulation study.
    Weymann D; Chan B; Regier DA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Aug; 23(1):181. PubMed ID: 37559105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Augmented and doubly robust G-estimation of causal effects under a Structural nested failure time model.
    Mertens K; Vansteelandt S
    Biometrics; 2018 Jun; 74(2):472-480. PubMed ID: 28742252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An inverse probability weighted regression method that accounts for right-censoring for causal inference with multiple treatments and a binary outcome.
    Yu Y; Zhang M; Mukherjee B
    Stat Med; 2023 Sep; 42(20):3699-3715. PubMed ID: 37392070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bias associated with using the estimated propensity score as a regression covariate.
    Hade EM; Lu B
    Stat Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):74-87. PubMed ID: 23787715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simultaneously modelling censored survival data and repeatedly measured covariates: a Gibbs sampling approach.
    Faucett CL; Thomas DC
    Stat Med; 1996 Aug; 15(15):1663-85. PubMed ID: 8858789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Controlling for confounding via propensity score methods can result in biased estimation of the conditional AUC: A simulation study.
    Galadima HI; McClish DK
    Pharm Stat; 2019 Oct; 18(5):568-582. PubMed ID: 31111682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.
    Neugebauer R; Schmittdiel JA; Zhu Z; Rassen JA; Seeger JD; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):753-81. PubMed ID: 25488047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of recurrence of colorectal adenomas with dependent censoring using weighted logistic regression.
    Hsu CH; Li Y; Long Q; Zhao Q; Lance P
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(10):e25141. PubMed ID: 22065985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.