131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29025299)
1. Simple Decision-Analytic Functions of the AUC for Ruling Out a Risk Prediction Model and an Added Predictor.
Baker SG
Med Decis Making; 2018 Feb; 38(2):225-234. PubMed ID: 29025299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating Risk Prediction with Data Collection Costs: Novel Estimation of Test Tradeoff Curves.
Baker SG
Med Decis Making; 2024 Jan; 44(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 37990924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How to interpret a small increase in AUC with an additional risk prediction marker: decision analysis comes through.
Baker SG; Schuit E; Steyerberg EW; Pencina MJ; Vickers A; Moons KG; Mol BW; Lindeman KS
Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(22):3946-59. PubMed ID: 24825728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Small improvement in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve indicated small changes in predicted risks.
Martens FK; Tonk EC; Kers JG; Janssens AC
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Nov; 79():159-164. PubMed ID: 27430730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metrics for Evaluating Polygenic Risk Scores.
Baker SG
JNCI Cancer Spectr; 2021 Feb; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 34957374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction models for platinum-based chemotherapy response and toxicity in advanced NSCLC patients.
Yin JY; Li X; Li XP; Xiao L; Zheng W; Chen J; Mao CX; Fang C; Cui JJ; Guo CX; Zhang W; Gao Y; Zhang CF; Chen ZH; Zhou H; Zhou HH; Liu ZQ
Cancer Lett; 2016 Jul; 377(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 27126360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Calibration of risk prediction models: impact on decision-analytic performance.
Van Calster B; Vickers AJ
Med Decis Making; 2015 Feb; 35(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25155798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preventing Heterotopic Ossification in Combat Casualties-Which Models Are Best Suited for Clinical Use?
Alfieri KA; Potter BK; Davis TA; Wagner MB; Elster EA; Forsberg JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2807-13. PubMed ID: 25917420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Graphical assessment of incremental value of novel markers in prediction models: From statistical to decision analytical perspectives.
Steyerberg EW; Vedder MM; Leening MJ; Postmus D; D'Agostino RB; Van Calster B; Pencina MJ
Biom J; 2015 Jul; 57(4):556-70. PubMed ID: 25042996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How variation in predictor measurement affects the discriminative ability and transportability of a prediction model.
Pajouheshnia R; van Smeden M; Peelen LM; Groenwold RHH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 105():136-141. PubMed ID: 30223065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A global goodness-of-fit test for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis via the bootstrap method.
Zou KH; Resnic FS; Talos IF; Goldberg-Zimring D; Bhagwat JG; Haker SJ; Kikinis R; Jolesz FA; Ohno-Machado L
J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16198998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can We Estimate Short- and Intermediate-term Survival in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Metastatic Bone Disease?
Forsberg JA; Wedin R; Boland PJ; Healey JH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):1252-1261. PubMed ID: 27909972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating a new marker for risk prediction: decision analysis to the rescue.
Baker SG; Kramer BS
Discov Med; 2012 Sep; 14(76):181-8. PubMed ID: 23021372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of outcomes to evaluate surveillance systems for bioterrorist attacks.
McBrien KA; Kleinman KP; Abrams AM; Prosser LA
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2010 May; 10():25. PubMed ID: 20459679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends of Hemoglobin Oximetry: Do They Help Predict Blood Transfusion During Trauma Patient Resuscitation?
Yang S; Hu PF; Anazodo A; Gao C; Chen H; Wade C; Hartsky L; Miller C; Imle C; Fang R; Mackenzie CF
Anesth Analg; 2016 Jan; 122(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 26683104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Venous Thrombosis Risk after Cast Immobilization of the Lower Extremity: Derivation and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Score, L-TRiP(cast), in Three Population-Based Case-Control Studies.
Nemeth B; van Adrichem RA; van Hylckama Vlieg A; Bucciarelli P; Martinelli I; Baglin T; Rosendaal FR; le Cessie S; Cannegieter SC
PLoS Med; 2015 Nov; 12(11):e1001899; discussion e1001899. PubMed ID: 26554832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating a new marker for risk prediction using the test tradeoff: an update.
Baker SG; Van Calster B; Steyerberg EW
Int J Biostat; 2012 Mar; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 22499728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The ACS NSQIP Risk Calculator Is a Fair Predictor of Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection.
Wingert NC; Gotoff J; Parrilla E; Gotoff R; Hou L; Ghanem E
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jul; 474(7):1643-8. PubMed ID: 26911971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A program for computing the prediction probability and the related receiver operating characteristic graph.
Jordan D; Steiner M; Kochs EF; Schneider G
Anesth Analg; 2010 Dec; 111(6):1416-21. PubMed ID: 21059744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An extension of the receiver operating characteristic curve and AUC-optimal classification.
Takenouchi T; Komori O; Eguchi S
Neural Comput; 2012 Oct; 24(10):2789-824. PubMed ID: 22734493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
