These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29025299)

  • 21. Predicting Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subtype Using Multiple Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms for Breast Cancer Risk and Several Variable Selection Methods.
    Häberle L; Hein A; Rübner M; Schneider M; Ekici AB; Gass P; Hartmann A; Schulz-Wendtland R; Beckmann MW; Lo WY; Schroth W; Brauch H; Fasching PA; Wunderle M
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 2017 Jun; 77(6):667-678. PubMed ID: 28757654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Strategies for developing prediction models from genome-wide association studies.
    Wu J; Pfeiffer RM; Gail MH
    Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 37(8):768-77. PubMed ID: 24166696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Developing a clinical utility framework to evaluate prediction models in radiogenomics.
    Wu Y; Liu J; Del Rio AM; Page DC; Alagoz O; Peissig P; Onitilo AA; Burnside ES
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2015 Feb; 9416():. PubMed ID: 27095854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of a validated model to predict 30-day stroke and 1-year survival after carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis using the Vascular Quality Initiative.
    DeMartino RR; Brooke BS; Neal D; Beck AW; Conrad MF; Arya S; Desai S; Aziz F; Ryan P; Cronenwett JL; Kraiss LW;
    J Vasc Surg; 2017 Aug; 66(2):433-444.e2. PubMed ID: 28583737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Risk stratification in the investigation of pulmonary nodules in a high-risk cohort: positron emission tomography/computed tomography outperforms clinical risk prediction algorithms.
    Gibson G; Kumar AR; Steinke K; Bashirzadeh F; Roach R; Windsor M; Ware R; Fielding D
    Intern Med J; 2017 Dec; 47(12):1385-1392. PubMed ID: 28782248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical risk factors alone are inadequate for predicting significant coronary artery disease.
    Korley FK; Gatsonis C; Snyder BS; George RT; Abd T; Zimmerman SL; Litt HI; Hollander JE
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(4):309-316. PubMed ID: 28487137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating the effect of multiple genetic risk score models on colorectal cancer risk prediction.
    Xin J; Chu H; Ben S; Ge Y; Shao W; Zhao Y; Wei Y; Ma G; Li S; Gu D; Zhang Z; Du M; Wang M
    Gene; 2018 Oct; 673():174-180. PubMed ID: 29908285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. ROC curves for clinical prediction models part 1. ROC plots showed no added value above the AUC when evaluating the performance of clinical prediction models.
    Verbakel JY; Steyerberg EW; Uno H; De Cock B; Wynants L; Collins GS; Van Calster B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():207-216. PubMed ID: 32712176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Understanding increments in model performance metrics.
    Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB; Massaro JM
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2013 Apr; 19(2):202-18. PubMed ID: 23242535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.
    Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB; D'Agostino RB; Vasan RS
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):157-72; discussion 207-12. PubMed ID: 17569110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Can A Multivariate Model for Survival Estimation in Skeletal Metastases (PATHFx) Be Externally Validated Using Japanese Patients?
    Ogura K; Gokita T; Shinoda Y; Kawano H; Takagi T; Ae K; Kawai A; Wedin R; Forsberg JA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Sep; 475(9):2263-2270. PubMed ID: 28560532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reflection on modern methods: Revisiting the area under the ROC Curve.
    Janssens ACJW; Martens FK
    Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Aug; 49(4):1397-1403. PubMed ID: 31967640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. SAS macros for point and interval estimation of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for non-proportional and proportional hazards Weibull models.
    Mannan H; Stevenson C
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2010 Aug; 16(4):756-70. PubMed ID: 20545799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Misuse of DeLong test to compare AUCs for nested models.
    Demler OV; Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2012 Oct; 31(23):2577-87. PubMed ID: 22415937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prediction of thoracic injury severity in frontal impacts by selected anatomical morphomic variables through model-averaged logistic regression approach.
    Zhang P; Parenteau C; Wang L; Holcombe S; Kohoyda-Inglis C; Sullivan J; Wang S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Nov; 60():172-80. PubMed ID: 24060439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Identifying the Most Informative Prediction Tool for Cancer-specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy: Comparative Analysis of Three Commonly Used Preoperative Prediction Models.
    Boehm K; Larcher A; Beyer B; Tian Z; Tilki D; Steuber T; Karakiewicz PI; Heinzer H; Graefen M; Budäus L
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1038-43. PubMed ID: 26272236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantifying risk stratification provided by diagnostic tests and risk predictions: Comparison to AUC and decision curve analysis.
    Katki HA
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(16):2943-2955. PubMed ID: 31037749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Towards probabilistic decision support in public health practice: predicting recent transmission of tuberculosis from patient attributes.
    Mamiya H; Schwartzman K; Verma A; Jauvin C; Behr M; Buckeridge D
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Feb; 53():237-42. PubMed ID: 25460204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of markers and risk prediction models: overview of relationships between NRI and decision-analytic measures.
    Van Calster B; Vickers AJ; Pencina MJ; Baker SG; Timmerman D; Steyerberg EW
    Med Decis Making; 2013 May; 33(4):490-501. PubMed ID: 23313931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Putting risk prediction in perspective: relative utility curves.
    Baker SG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Nov; 101(22):1538-42. PubMed ID: 19843888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.