415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29025667)
1. Adhesion forces of biofilms developed in vitro from clinical strains of skin wounds.
Alvarado-Gomez E; Perez-Diaz M; Valdez-Perez D; Ruiz-Garcia J; Magaña-Aquino M; Martinez-Castañon G; Martinez-Gutierrez F
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2018 Jan; 82():336-344. PubMed ID: 29025667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biofilm-forming capacity of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ocular infections.
Hou W; Sun X; Wang Z; Zhang Y
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 53(9):5624-31. PubMed ID: 22736609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the Zürich burn-biofilm model.
Guggenheim M; Thurnheer T; Gmür R; Giovanoli P; Guggenheim B
Burns; 2011 Nov; 37(7):1125-33. PubMed ID: 21724333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metabolic modeling of a chronic wound biofilm consortium predicts spatial partitioning of bacterial species.
Phalak P; Chen J; Carlson RP; Henson MA
BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Sep; 10(1):90. PubMed ID: 27604263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biofilm formation by clinical isolates and the implications in chronic infections.
Sanchez CJ; Mende K; Beckius ML; Akers KS; Romano DR; Wenke JC; Murray CK
BMC Infect Dis; 2013 Jan; 13():47. PubMed ID: 23356488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Establishment of a multi-species biofilm model to evaluate chlorhexidine efficacy.
Touzel RE; Sutton JM; Wand ME
J Hosp Infect; 2016 Feb; 92(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 26597632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Atomic force microscopy in biofilm study.
Chatterjee S; Biswas N; Datta A; Dey R; Maiti P
Microscopy (Oxf); 2014 Aug; 63(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 24793174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. N-acetylcysteine inhibits growth, adhesion and biofilm formation of Gram-positive skin pathogens.
Eroshenko D; Polyudova T; Korobov V
Microb Pathog; 2017 Apr; 105():145-152. PubMed ID: 28237766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Synergistic effect of polyaniline coverage and surface microstructure on the inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation.
Gallarato LA; Mulko LE; Dardanelli MS; Barbero CA; Acevedo DF; Yslas EI
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2017 Feb; 150():1-7. PubMed ID: 27863264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa influences biofilm formation and surface protein expression of Staphylococcus aureus.
Kumar A; Ting YP
Environ Microbiol; 2015 Nov; 17(11):4459-68. PubMed ID: 25925222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combined influence of nitric oxide and surface roughness in biofilm reduction across bacteria strains.
Paricio L; Neufeld B; Reynolds M
Biointerphases; 2019 Apr; 14(2):021004. PubMed ID: 30947504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to analyze the molecular profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms grown on glass and plastic surfaces.
Pereira FD; Bonatto CC; Lopes CA; Pereira AL; Silva LP
Microb Pathog; 2015 Sep; 86():32-7. PubMed ID: 26162295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The visualization of biofilms in chronic diabetic foot wounds using routine diagnostic microscopy methods.
Oates A; Bowling FL; Boulton AJ; Bowler PG; Metcalf DG; McBain AJ
J Diabetes Res; 2014; 2014():153586. PubMed ID: 24839608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coculture of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus on cell derived matrix - An in vitro model of biofilms in infected wounds.
Gounani Z; Şen Karaman D; Venu AP; Cheng F; Rosenholm JM
J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Aug; 175():105994. PubMed ID: 32593628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microbe repelling coated stainless steel analysed by field emission scanning electron microscopy and physicochemical methods.
Raulio M; Järn M; Ahola J; Peltonen J; Rosenholm JB; Tervakangas S; Kolehmainen J; Ruokolainen T; Narko P; Salkinoja-Salonen M
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2008 Jul; 35(7):751-60. PubMed ID: 18379832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro multispecies Lubbock chronic wound biofilm model.
Sun Y; Dowd SE; Smith E; Rhoads DD; Wolcott RD
Wound Repair Regen; 2008; 16(6):805-13. PubMed ID: 19128252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The activity of ferulic and gallic acids in biofilm prevention and control of pathogenic bacteria.
Borges A; Saavedra MJ; Simões M
Biofouling; 2012; 28(7):755-67. PubMed ID: 22823343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In Vitro Efficacy of Nonantibiotic Treatments on Biofilm Disruption of Gram-Negative Pathogens and an In Vivo Model of Infectious Endometritis Utilizing Isolates from the Equine Uterus.
Ferris RA; McCue PM; Borlee GI; Loncar KD; Hennet ML; Borlee BR
J Clin Microbiol; 2016 Mar; 54(3):631-9. PubMed ID: 26719448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nanoscale investigation on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formed on porous silicon using atomic force microscopy.
Kannan A; Karumanchi SL; Krishna V; Thiruvengadam K; Ramalingam S; Gautam P
Scanning; 2014; 36(5):551-3. PubMed ID: 25042006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tympanostomy tube in vitro biofilm potential of common otopathogens.
Ojano-Dirain C; Antonelli PJ
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 May; 146(5):816-22. PubMed ID: 22371343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
