These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29025895)

  • 1. Accounting for GC-content bias reduces systematic errors and batch effects in ChIP-seq data.
    Teng M; Irizarry RA
    Genome Res; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1930-1938. PubMed ID: 29025895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving analysis of transcription factor binding sites within ChIP-Seq data based on topological motif enrichment.
    Worsley Hunt R; Mathelier A; Del Peso L; Wasserman WW
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):472. PubMed ID: 24927817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. OccuPeak: ChIP-Seq peak calling based on internal background modelling.
    de Boer BA; van Duijvenboden K; van den Boogaard M; Christoffels VM; Barnett P; Ruijter JM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99844. PubMed ID: 24936875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A generalized linear model for peak calling in ChIP-Seq data.
    Xu J; Zhang Y
    J Comput Biol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):826-38. PubMed ID: 22533622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unified Analysis of Multiple ChIP-Seq Datasets.
    Ma G; Babarinde IA; Zhuang Q; Hutchins AP
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2198():451-465. PubMed ID: 32822050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ritornello: high fidelity control-free chromatin immunoprecipitation peak calling.
    Stanton KP; Jin J; Lederman RR; Weissman SM; Kluger Y
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Dec; 45(21):e173. PubMed ID: 28981893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shape-based peak identification for ChIP-Seq.
    Hower V; Evans SN; Pachter L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 12():15. PubMed ID: 21226895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. WACS: improving ChIP-seq peak calling by optimally weighting controls.
    Awdeh A; Turcotte M; Perkins TJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Feb; 22(1):69. PubMed ID: 33588754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Normalization, bias correction, and peak calling for ChIP-seq.
    Diaz A; Park K; Lim DA; Song JS
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Mar; 11(3):Article 9. PubMed ID: 22499706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ChIP-R: Assembling reproducible sets of ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq peaks from multiple replicates.
    Newell R; Pienaar R; Balderson B; Piper M; Essebier A; Bodén M
    Genomics; 2021 Jul; 113(4):1855-1866. PubMed ID: 33878366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Triform algorithm: improved sensitivity and specificity in ChIP-Seq peak finding.
    Kornacker K; Rye MB; Håndstad T; Drabløs F
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():176. PubMed ID: 22827163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. RECAP reveals the true statistical significance of ChIP-seq peak calls.
    Chitpin JG; Awdeh A; Perkins TJ
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 35(19):3592-3598. PubMed ID: 30824903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. HiChIP: a high-throughput pipeline for integrative analysis of ChIP-Seq data.
    Yan H; Evans J; Kalmbach M; Moore R; Middha S; Luban S; Wang L; Bhagwate A; Li Y; Sun Z; Chen X; Kocher JP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Aug; 15(1):280. PubMed ID: 25128017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Greenscreen: A simple method to remove artifactual signals and enrich for true peaks in genomic datasets including ChIP-seq data.
    Klasfeld S; Roulé T; Wagner D
    Plant Cell; 2022 Nov; 34(12):4795-4815. PubMed ID: 36124976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic bias in high-throughput sequencing data and its correction by BEADS.
    Cheung MS; Down TA; Latorre I; Ahringer J
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Aug; 39(15):e103. PubMed ID: 21646344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic evaluation of factors influencing ChIP-seq fidelity.
    Chen Y; Negre N; Li Q; Mieczkowska JO; Slattery M; Liu T; Zhang Y; Kim TK; He HH; Zieba J; Ruan Y; Bickel PJ; Myers RM; Wold BJ; White KP; Lieb JD; Liu XS
    Nat Methods; 2012 Jun; 9(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 22522655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PePr: a peak-calling prioritization pipeline to identify consistent or differential peaks from replicated ChIP-Seq data.
    Zhang Y; Lin YH; Johnson TD; Rozek LS; Sartor MA
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 30(18):2568-75. PubMed ID: 24894502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decoding ChIP-seq with a double-binding signal refines binding peaks to single-nucleotides and predicts cooperative interaction.
    Gomes AL; Abeel T; Peterson M; Azizi E; Lyubetskaya A; Carvalho L; Galagan J
    Genome Res; 2014 Oct; 24(10):1686-97. PubMed ID: 25024162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving ChIP-seq peak-calling for functional co-regulator binding by integrating multiple sources of biological information.
    Osmanbeyoglu HU; Hartmaier RJ; Oesterreich S; Lu X
    BMC Genomics; 2012; 13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. PubMed ID: 22369349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ChIPulate: A comprehensive ChIP-seq simulation pipeline.
    Datta V; Hannenhalli S; Siddharthan R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Mar; 15(3):e1006921. PubMed ID: 30897079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.