141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29026322)
1. Molecular classification of esophagogastric junction carcinoma correlated with prognosis.
Zou L; Wu Y; Ma K; Fan Y; Dong D; Geng N; Li E
Onco Targets Ther; 2017; 10():4765-4772. PubMed ID: 29026322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical characteristics and prognostic significance of TCGA and ACRG classification in gastric cancer among the Chinese population.
Wang Q; Xie Q; Liu Y; Guo H; Ren Y; Li J; Zhao Q
Mol Med Rep; 2020 Aug; 22(2):828-840. PubMed ID: 32468041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molecular subtyping of gastric cancer according to ACRG using immunohistochemistry - Correlation with clinical parameters.
Pretzsch E; Bösch F; Todorova R; Nieß H; Jacob S; Guba M; Kirchner T; Werner J; Klauschen F; Angele MK; Neumann J
Pathol Res Pract; 2022 Mar; 231():153797. PubMed ID: 35151032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Immunogenic characteristics of microsatellite instability-low esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma based on clinicopathological, molecular, immunological and survival analyses.
Imamura Y; Toihata T; Haraguchi I; Ogata Y; Takamatsu M; Kuchiba A; Tanaka N; Gotoh O; Mori S; Nakashima Y; Oki E; Mori M; Oda Y; Taguchi K; Yamamoto M; Morita M; Yoshida N; Baba H; Mine S; Nunobe S; Sano T; Noda T; Watanabe M
Int J Cancer; 2021 Mar; 148(5):1260-1275. PubMed ID: 32997798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproduction of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG) Gastric Cancer Molecular Classifications and Their Association with Clinicopathological Characteristics and Overall Survival in Moroccan Patients.
Nshizirungu JP; Bennis S; Mellouki I; Sekal M; Benajah DA; Lahmidani N; El Bouhaddouti H; Ibn Majdoub K; Ibrahimi SA; Celeiro SP; Viana-Pereira M; Munari FF; Ribeiro GG; Duval V; Santana I; Reis RM
Dis Markers; 2021; 2021():9980410. PubMed ID: 34367379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Molecular subtyping of gastroesophageal dysplasia heterogeneity according to TCGA/ACRG classes.
Angerilli V; Pennelli G; Galuppini F; Realdon S; Fantin A; Savarino E; Farinati F; Mastracci L; Luchini C; Fassan M
Virchows Arch; 2022 Oct; 481(4):545-552. PubMed ID: 35925389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microsatellite instability in poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas of the colon and rectum: relationship to clinicopathological features.
Kazama Y; Watanabe T; Kanazawa T; Tanaka J; Tanaka T; Nagawa H
J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jun; 60(6):701-4. PubMed ID: 17557871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gastric cancer molecular classification based on immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization: Analysis in western patients after curative-intent surgery.
Ramos MFKP; Pereira MA; de Mello ES; Cirqueira CDS; Zilberstein B; Alves VAF; Ribeiro-Junior U; Cecconello I
World J Clin Oncol; 2021 Aug; 12(8):688-701. PubMed ID: 34513602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of mesenchymal subtype gene signature for clinical application in gastric cancer.
Lee J; Cristescu R; Kim KM; Kim K; Kim ST; Park SH; Kang WK
Oncotarget; 2017 Sep; 8(39):66305-66315. PubMed ID: 29029513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colorectal cancer molecular classification using BRAF, KRAS, microsatellite instability and CIMP status: Prognostic implications and response to chemotherapy.
Murcia O; Juárez M; Rodríguez-Soler M; Hernández-Illán E; Giner-Calabuig M; Alustiza M; Egoavil C; Castillejo A; Alenda C; Barberá V; Mangas-Sanjuan C; Yuste A; Bujanda L; Clofent J; Andreu M; Castells A; Llor X; Zapater P; Jover R
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203051. PubMed ID: 30188916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single Patient Classifier Assay, Microsatellite Instability, and Epstein-Barr Virus Status Predict Clinical Outcomes in Stage II/III Gastric Cancer: Results from CLASSIC Trial.
Roh CK; Choi YY; Choi S; Seo WJ; Cho M; Jang E; Son T; Kim HI; Kim H; Hyung WJ; Huh YM; Noh SH; Cheong JH
Yonsei Med J; 2019 Feb; 60(2):132-139. PubMed ID: 30666834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of the value of 7th editions of UICC-AJCC esophageal and gastric cancer TNM staging systems for prognostic prediction of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (Siewert type II)].
Shi GD; Luo ZL; Fu MY; Tian D; Zhang L; Zhang KP
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 36(12):916-21. PubMed ID: 25623766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subtraction of Epstein-Barr virus and microsatellite instability genotypes from the Lauren histotypes: Combined molecular and histologic subtyping with clinicopathological and prognostic significance validated in a cohort of 1,248 cases.
Huang SC; Ng KF; Yeh TS; Cheng CT; Lin JS; Liu YJ; Chuang HC; Chen TC
Int J Cancer; 2019 Dec; 145(12):3218-3230. PubMed ID: 30771224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic Value of BRAF and KRAS Mutations in MSI and MSS Stage III Colon Cancer.
Taieb J; Le Malicot K; Shi Q; Penault-Llorca F; Bouché O; Tabernero J; Mini E; Goldberg RM; Folprecht G; Luc Van Laethem J; Sargent DJ; Alberts SR; Emile JF; Laurent Puig P; Sinicrope FA
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 May; 109(5):. PubMed ID: 28040692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should the grading of colorectal adenocarcinoma include microsatellite instability status?
Rosty C; Williamson EJ; Clendenning M; Walters RJ; Win AK; Jenkins MA; Hopper JL; Winship IM; Southey MC; Giles GG; English DR; Buchanan DD
Hum Pathol; 2014 Oct; 45(10):2077-84. PubMed ID: 25149551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combination of microsatellite instability and BRAF mutation status for subtyping colorectal cancer.
Seppälä TT; Böhm JP; Friman M; Lahtinen L; Väyrynen VM; Liipo TK; Ristimäki AP; Kairaluoma MV; Kellokumpu IH; Kuopio TH; Mecklin JP
Br J Cancer; 2015 Jun; 112(12):1966-75. PubMed ID: 25973534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic implication of molecular subtypes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 760 gastric carcinomas: role of Epstein-Barr virus infection and high- and low-microsatellite instability.
Kohlruss M; Grosser B; Krenauer M; Slotta-Huspenina J; Jesinghaus M; Blank S; Novotny A; Reiche M; Schmidt T; Ismani L; Hapfelmeier A; Mathias D; Meyer P; Gaida MM; Bauer L; Ott K; Weichert W; Keller G
J Pathol Clin Res; 2019 Oct; 5(4):227-239. PubMed ID: 31206244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Association Between Mutations in BRAF and Colorectal Cancer-Specific Survival Depends on Microsatellite Status and Tumor Stage.
Bläker H; Alwers E; Arnold A; Herpel E; Tagscherer KE; Roth W; Jansen L; Walter V; Kloor M; Chang-Claude J; Brenner H; Hoffmeister M
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Feb; 17(3):455-462.e6. PubMed ID: 29660527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcome of Mismatch Repair-Deficient Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Mayo Clinic Experience.
Jin Z; Sanhueza CT; Johnson B; Nagorney DM; Larson DW; Mara KC; Harmsen WC; Smyrk TC; Grothey A; Hubbard JM
Oncologist; 2018 Sep; 23(9):1083-1091. PubMed ID: 29674439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EMAST is associated with a poor prognosis in microsatellite instable metastatic colorectal cancer.
Venderbosch S; van Lent-van Vliet S; de Haan AF; Ligtenberg MJ; Goossens M; Punt CJ; Koopman M; Nagtegaal ID
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0124538. PubMed ID: 25884216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
