These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29026702)

  • 1. Apical Extrusion of Intracanal Bacteria with Single File and Multifile Rotary Instrumentation Systems.
    Saberi E; Zahedani SS; Ebrahimipour S
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2017; 7(5):292-296. PubMed ID: 29026702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Apical extrusion of bacteria when using reciprocating single-file and rotary multifile instrumentation systems.
    Tinoco JM; De-Deus G; Tinoco EM; Saavedra F; Fidel RA; Sassone LM
    Int Endod J; 2014 Jun; 47(6):560-6. PubMed ID: 24111671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying the extruded bacteria following use of two rotary instrumentation systems.
    Mohammadi Z; Khademi A
    Iran Endod J; 2007; 2(3):77-80. PubMed ID: 24298285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of working length and apical preparation size on apical bacterial extrusion during reciprocating instrumentation.
    Teixeira JM; Cunha FM; Jesus RO; Silva EJ; Fidel SR; Sassone LM
    Int Endod J; 2015 Jul; 48(7):648-53. PubMed ID: 25087922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using rotary ProTaper, K3XF, twisted and hand K-file system: An ex vivo study.
    Ghogre P; Chourasia HR; Agarwal M; Singh MP; Gurav S; Ghogre R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 26481889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using K3, Mtwo, RaCe and protaper rotary systems: An in vitro study.
    Garlapati R; Venigalla BS; Patil JD; Raju R; Rammohan C
    J Conserv Dent; 2013 Jul; 16(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 23956529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of two engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
    Er K; Sümer Z; Akpinar KE
    Int Endod J; 2005 Dec; 38(12):871-6. PubMed ID: 16343113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Apical Debris Extrusion with Conventional Rotary and Reciprocating Instruments.
    Eshagh Saberi A; Ebrahimipour S; Saberi M
    Iran Endod J; 2020; 15(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 36704322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of various instrumentation techniques.
    Kuştarci A; Akpinar KE; Sümer Z; Er K; Bek B
    Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19133095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using ProTaper Next, Mtwo, and ProTaper rotary systems: An
    Polineni S; Damaraju B; Bolla N; Sunil C; Krishna NV; Sreeha K
    J Conserv Dent; 2020; 23(3):314-318. PubMed ID: 33551607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of various endodontic instrumentation systems on the amount of apically extruded bacteria - An
    Sahni G; Garg N; Chhabra A; Negi S; Gupta S; Chhabra V
    J Conserv Dent; 2020; 23(3):270-274. PubMed ID: 33551598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of apical bacterial extrusion following root canal instrumentation using different endodontic file systems: An
    Vankayala B; Anantula K; Saladi H; Gudugunta L; Basavarajaiah JM; Yadav SS
    J Conserv Dent; 2019; 22(6):559-563. PubMed ID: 33088065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of conventional, protaper hand and protaper rotary instrumentation system for apical extrusion of debris, irrigants and bacteria- An
    Kalra P; Rao A; Suman E; Shenoy R; Suprabha BS
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2017 Feb; 9(2):e254-e258. PubMed ID: 28210445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro evaluation of apical extrusion of bacteria following use of new rotary instrumentation system.
    Mohammadi Z
    N Y State Dent J; 2009 Apr; 75(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 19548490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using hand and three rotary instrumentation systems − An in vitro study.
    Madhusudhana K; Mathew VB; Reddy NM
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2010 Oct; 1(4):234-6. PubMed ID: 22114427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Apical extrusion of
    Aydin U; Zer Y; Zorlu Golge M; Kirkgoz Karabulut E; Culha E; Karataslioglu E
    J Dent Sci; 2017 Mar; 12(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 30895016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Apical Extrusion of Intracanal Bacteria following use of Two Engine-driven Instrumentation Techniques: An in vitro Study.
    Mohammed N; Noushad MC; Balan B; Dhanesh N; Jayasheelan N; Revankar VD
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):939-942. PubMed ID: 27965505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison of Apical Bacterial Extrusion in Manual, ProTaper Rotary, and One Shape Rotary Instrumentation Techniques.
    Mittal R; Singla MG; Garg A; Dhawan A
    J Endod; 2015 Dec; 41(12):2040-4. PubMed ID: 26472680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does the Reciproc file remove root canal bacteria and endotoxins as effectively as multifile rotary systems?
    Marinho AC; Martinho FC; Gonçalves LM; Rabang HR; Gomes BP
    Int Endod J; 2015 Jun; 48(6):542-8. PubMed ID: 25070009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with different single-file systems: Reciproc, F360 and OneShape versus Mtwo.
    Bürklein S; Benten S; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2014 May; 47(5):405-9. PubMed ID: 23889673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.