BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 290270)

  • 1. Occlusion, arch dimensions, and craniofacial morphology after palatal surgery in a group of children with clefts in the secondary palate.
    Jonsson G; Thilander B
    Am J Orthod; 1979 Sep; 76(3):243-55. PubMed ID: 290270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dental arches in submucous cleft palate: comparison of six-year-old boys with unoperated submucous cleft palate, with operated cleft of the soft palate, and without a cleft.
    Heliövaara A; Rautio J; Nyström M
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2007 Aug; 65(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 17762986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Craniofacial and occlusal characteristics in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients from four Scandinavian centres.
    Friede H; Enemark H; Semb G; Paulin G; Abyholm F; Bolund S; Lilja J; Ostrup L
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 1991; 25(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 1780725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maxillary dental arch and occlusion in patients with repaired clefts of the secondary palate. Influence of push back palatal surgery.
    Friede H; Persson EC; Lilja J; Elander A; Lohmander-Agerskov A; Söderpalm E
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 1993 Dec; 27(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 8159944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Timing of hard palate closure and dental arch relationships in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients: a mixed-longitudinal study.
    Noverraz AE; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Mars M; van't Hof MA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1993 Jul; 30(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 8399268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Palate morphology after unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate closure.
    Schliephake H; Donnerstag F; Berten JL; Lönquist N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 16154317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of cleft length and palatoplasty on the dental arch and the deciduous occlusion in cases of clefts of the secondary palate.
    Hellquist R; Pontén B; Skoog T
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg; 1978; 12(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 663564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dental arch dimensions in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Athanasiou AE; Mazaheri M; Zarrinnia K
    Cleft Palate J; 1988 Apr; 25(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 3163289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of the maxillary dental arch after rapid maxillary expansion in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.
    Ayub PV; Janson G; Gribel BF; Lara TS; Garib DG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 May; 149(5):705-15. PubMed ID: 27131253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in occlusion and maxillary dental arch dimensions in adults with treated unilateral complete cleft lip and palate: a follow-up study.
    Marcusson A; Paulin G
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Aug; 26(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 15366382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of craniofacial form in Northern Irish children with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with different primary surgical techniques.
    Johnston CD; Leonard AG; Burden DJ; McSherry PF
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Jan; 41(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 14697071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postnatal craniofacial skeleton development following a pushback operation of patients with cleft palate.
    Viteporn S; Enemark H; Melsen B
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1991 Oct; 28(4):392-6; discussion 397. PubMed ID: 1742309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of lip adhesion and presurgical orthopedics on facial growth: an evaluation of four treatment protocols.
    Van der Beek MC; Hoeksma JB; Prahl-Andersen B; Meijer R
    J Biol Buccale; 1992 Dec; 20(4):191-6. PubMed ID: 1306181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maxillary arch dimensions in bilateral cleft lip and palate from birth until four years of age in boys.
    Heidbuchel KL; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Kramer GJ; Prahl-Andersen B
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 May; 35(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 9603558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influences of palatoplasty by the push-back procedure on craniofacial morphology and growth.
    Iwasaki H; Kudo M; Yamamoto Y
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):638-46. PubMed ID: 22093242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of timing and method of cleft palate repair on dental arches at the age of three years.
    Nyström M; Ranta R
    Cleft Palate J; 1990 Oct; 27(4):349-52; discussion 352-3. PubMed ID: 2253380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frontal cephalometric evaluation of transverse dentofacial morphology and growth of children with isolated cleft palate.
    Athanasiou AE; Moyers RE; Mazaheri M; Toutountzakis N
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1991 Aug; 19(6):249-53. PubMed ID: 1939671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dental treatment of predental and infant patients with clefts and craniofacial anomalies.
    Prahl-Andersen B
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Nov; 37(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 11108519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Longitudinal study of the dental arch dimensions in hard and soft palate clefts.
    Athanasiou AE; Mazaheri M; Zarrinnia K
    J Pedod; 1987; 12(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 3481827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Von Langenbeck palatoplasty on facial growth.
    Bishara SE; Tharp RM
    Angle Orthod; 1977 Jan; 47(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 264775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.