BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

681 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29027400)

  • 1. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
    Shah CA; Beck T; Liao JB; Giannakopoulos NV; Veljovich D; Paley P
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e82. PubMed ID: 29027400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
    Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Park DA; Yun JE; Kim SW; Lee SH
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 43(6):994-1002. PubMed ID: 27546015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
    Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Robotic Surgery Compared With Laparoscopic and Abdominal Surgery in the Management of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Corrado G; Cutillo G; Saltari M; Mancini E; Sindico S; Vici P; Sergi D; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Pomati G; Baiocco E; Vizza E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 26825826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preoperative Conization and Risk of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study.
    Casarin J; Bogani G; Papadia A; Ditto A; Pinelli C; Garzon S; Donadello N; Laganà AS; Cromi A; Mueller M; Raspagliesi F; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 32320800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-institution Experience of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Patrono MG; Colombo N; Maggioni A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 27158094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience.
    Cantrell LA; Mendivil A; Gehrig PA; Boggess JF
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 May; 117(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 20153886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study.
    Kim TH; Choi CH; Choi JK; Yoon A; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1466-73. PubMed ID: 25207462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No survival difference between robotic and open radical hysterectomy for women with early-stage cervical cancer: results from a nationwide population-based cohort study.
    Alfonzo E; Wallin E; Ekdahl L; Staf C; Rådestad AF; Reynisson P; Stålberg K; Falconer H; Persson J; Dahm-Kähler P
    Eur J Cancer; 2019 Jul; 116():169-177. PubMed ID: 31200323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer.
    Sert BM; Boggess JF; Ahmad S; Jackson AL; Stavitzski NM; Dahl AA; Holloway RW
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 42(4):513-22. PubMed ID: 26843445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
    Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution.
    Doo DW; Kirkland CT; Griswold LH; McGwin G; Huh WK; Leath CA; Kim KH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 30850169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic compared with open radical hysterectomy in obese women with early-stage cervical cancer.
    Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 119(6):1201-9. PubMed ID: 22617585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of different surgical approaches in the clinical and survival outcomes of patients with early-stage cervical cancer: protocol of a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial in China.
    Chao X; Li L; Wu M; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Lang J; Cheng A; Li W
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e029055. PubMed ID: 31362966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
    Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.