These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29027847)

  • 1. Antimicrobial activity of a bioelectric dressing using an in vitro wound pathogen colony drip-flow reactor biofilm model.
    Kim H; Izadjoo M
    J Wound Care; 2016 Jul; 25(Sup7):S47-S52. PubMed ID: 29027847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antibiofilm efficacy evaluation of a bioelectric dressing in mono- and multi-species biofilms.
    Kim H; Izadjoo MJ
    J Wound Care; 2015 Feb; 24 Suppl 2():S10-4. PubMed ID: 25647504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of microelectric potentials in a bioelectrically-active wound care device in the presence of bacteria.
    Park SS; Kim H; Makin IR; Skiba JB; Izadjoo MJ
    J Wound Care; 2015 Jan; 24(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 25543820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhanced Performance and Mode of Action of a Novel Antibiofilm Hydrofiber® Wound Dressing.
    Parsons D; Meredith K; Rowlands VJ; Short D; Metcalf DG; Bowler PG
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():7616471. PubMed ID: 27990437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of internally validated
    Suleman L; Purcell L; Thomas H; Westgate S
    J Wound Care; 2020 Mar; 29(3):154-161. PubMed ID: 32160088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Restoring balance: biofilms and wound dressings.
    Percival SL
    J Wound Care; 2018 Feb; 27(2):102-113. PubMed ID: 29424642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of a surfactant-based wound dressing on biofilm control.
    Percival SL; Mayer D; Salisbury AM
    Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Sep; 25(5):767-773. PubMed ID: 28857343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antibacterial properties and reduction of MRSA biofilm with a dressing combining polyabsorbent fibres and a silver matrix.
    Desroche N; Dropet C; Janod P; Guzzo J
    J Wound Care; 2016 Oct; 25(10):577-584. PubMed ID: 27681588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model.
    Seth AK; Zhong A; Nguyen KT; Hong SJ; Leung KP; Galiano RD; Mustoe TA
    Wound Repair Regen; 2014; 22(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 25230854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DEVELOPMENT OF A NEXT-GENERATION ANTIMICROBIAL WOUND DRESSING.
    Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler IP
    Acta Med Croatica; 2016 Mar; 70(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 27220190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical and in vitro performance of an antibiofilm Hydrofiber wound dressing.
    Scully R; Hurlow J; Walker M; Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler P
    J Wound Care; 2018 Sep; 27(9):584-592. PubMed ID: 30204577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cadexomer iodine provides superior efficacy against bacterial wound biofilms in vitro and in vivo.
    Fitzgerald DJ; Renick PJ; Forrest EC; Tetens SP; Earnest DN; McMillan J; Kiedaisch BM; Shi L; Roche ED
    Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Jan; 25(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 27859922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preclinical evaluation of a novel silver gelling fiber dressing on Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a porcine wound infection model.
    Davis SC; Li J; Gil J; Head C; Valdes J; Glinos GD; Solis M; Higa A; Pastar I
    Wound Repair Regen; 2019 Jul; 27(4):360-365. PubMed ID: 30920083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development, characterization, and evaluation of a simple polymicrobial colony biofilm model for testing of antimicrobial wound dressings.
    Robertson SN; Romero M; Fenn S; Kohler Riedi PL; Cámara M
    J Appl Microbiol; 2024 Mar; 135(3):. PubMed ID: 38366933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing wound dressings using an in vitro wound model.
    Lipp C; Kirker K; Agostinho A; James G; Stewart P
    J Wound Care; 2010 Jun; 19(6):220-6. PubMed ID: 20551862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vitro model for the growth and analysis of chronic wound MRSA biofilms.
    Agostinho AM; Hartman A; Lipp C; Parker AE; Stewart PS; James GA
    J Appl Microbiol; 2011 Nov; 111(5):1275-82. PubMed ID: 21883733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Overview of the Efficacy of a Next Generation Electroceutical Wound Care Device.
    Kim H; Park S; Housler G; Marcel V; Cross S; Izadjoo M
    Mil Med; 2016 May; 181(5 Suppl):184-90. PubMed ID: 27168571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical investigation of biofilm in non-healing wounds by high resolution microscopy techniques.
    Hurlow J; Blanz E; Gaddy JA
    J Wound Care; 2016 Sep; 25 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S11-22. PubMed ID: 27608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro comparison of antimicrobial activity of iodine and silver dressings against biofilms.
    Thorn RM; Austin AJ; Greenman J; Wilkins JP; Davis PJ
    J Wound Care; 2009 Aug; 18(8):343-6. PubMed ID: 19862874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel in vitro wound biofilm model used to evaluate low-frequency ultrasonic-assisted wound debridement.
    Crone S; Garde C; Bjarnsholt T; Alhede M
    J Wound Care; 2015 Feb; 24(2):64, 66-9, 72. PubMed ID: 25647434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.