These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29028479)

  • 1. Peer Review in Scientific Scholarship.
    Lowe NK
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2017; 46(6):799-800. PubMed ID: 29028479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review: a castle built on sand or the bedrock of scientific publishing?
    Berger E
    Ann Emerg Med; 2006 Feb; 47(2):157-9. PubMed ID: 16435419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality in peer review.
    Commun Biol; 2019; 2():352. PubMed ID: 31552304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ninth international congress on peer review and scientific publication: call for research.
    Ioannidis JPA; Berkwits M; Flanagin A; Godlee F; Bloom T
    BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5475. PubMed ID: 31527134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Open review and the quest for increased transparency in neuroscience publication.
    Foxe JJ; Bolam P
    Eur J Neurosci; 2017 May; 45(9):1125-1126. PubMed ID: 28186675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peering into peer review: Galileo, ESP, Dr Scott Reuben, and advancing our professional evolution.
    Biddle C
    AANA J; 2011 Oct; 79(5):365-6. PubMed ID: 23256263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Opening up Peer Review.
    DePellegrin TA; Johnston M
    Genetics; 2020 Nov; 216(3):619-620. PubMed ID: 33158984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review under the microscope: an editor's view.
    Chan DL
    J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2011 Oct; 21(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 22316192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increasing challenges for an effective peer-review process.
    Hak DJ; Giannoudis P; Mauffrey C
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Feb; 26(2):117-8. PubMed ID: 26724808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Lakartidningen's scrutiny routines--equal to the heavies. The peer review system and the expert editorial staff guarantee scientific quality].
    Milerad J; Ahlberg J; Bågedahl-Strindlund M; Eliasson M; Fridén B; Håkansson A; Sundberg CJ; Ostergren J
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Nov; 100(48):3934-6. PubMed ID: 14717088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scientific misconduct and Lipids: a view from an editor-in-chief.
    Murphy EJ
    Lipids; 2013 Jan; 48(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 23224616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How early-career researchers are shaping eLife.
    Patterson M; Schekman R
    Elife; 2018 Mar; 7():. PubMed ID: 29583120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review processes at the Health Information and Libraries Journal.
    Grant MJ
    Health Info Libr J; 2018 Dec; 35(4):263-264. PubMed ID: 30499172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Misconduct in medical-scientific publications].
    Manschot WA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Jan; 139(2):98. PubMed ID: 7838231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer.
    Faggion CM
    Br Dent J; 2016 Feb; 220(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 26917302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Am I flogging a dead metaphor? Sloppy scholarship and the implied spider.
    McKenzie R
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2005 Oct; 12(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 16164505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implementation of a journal peer reviewer stratification system based on quality and reliability.
    Green SM; Callaham ML
    Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 57(2):149-152.e4. PubMed ID: 20947204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Authors, reviewers and editors at The EMBO Journal.
    Rørth P
    EMBO J; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3831-3. PubMed ID: 16453402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is peer review in crisis?
    Mulligan A
    Oral Oncol; 2005 Feb; 41(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 15695114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.