These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29028869)

  • 21. Bioinformatics for NGS-based metagenomics and the application to biogas research.
    Jünemann S; Kleinbölting N; Jaenicke S; Henke C; Hassa J; Nelkner J; Stolze Y; Albaum SP; Schlüter A; Goesmann A; Sczyrba A; Stoye J
    J Biotechnol; 2017 Nov; 261():10-23. PubMed ID: 28823476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. MetaMeta: integrating metagenome analysis tools to improve taxonomic profiling.
    Piro VC; Matschkowski M; Renard BY
    Microbiome; 2017 Aug; 5(1):101. PubMed ID: 28807044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Workflows in bioinformatics: meta-analysis and prototype implementation of a workflow generator.
    Garcia Castro A; Thoraval S; Garcia LJ; Ragan MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():87. PubMed ID: 15813976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Practical considerations for sampling and data analysis in contemporary metagenomics-based environmental studies.
    Staley C; Sadowsky MJ
    J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Nov; 154():14-18. PubMed ID: 30287354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biowep: a workflow enactment portal for bioinformatics applications.
    Romano P; Bartocci E; Bertolini G; De Paoli F; Marra D; Mauri G; Merelli E; Milanesi L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S19. PubMed ID: 17430563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Metagenome Assembly and Contig Assignment.
    Zhang Q
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():179-192. PubMed ID: 30298255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. NG-meta-profiler: fast processing of metagenomes using NGLess, a domain-specific language.
    Coelho LP; Alves R; Monteiro P; Huerta-Cepas J; Freitas AT; Bork P
    Microbiome; 2019 Jun; 7(1):84. PubMed ID: 31159881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Flexible metagenome analysis using the MGX framework.
    Jaenicke S; Albaum SP; Blumenkamp P; Linke B; Stoye J; Goesmann A
    Microbiome; 2018 Apr; 6(1):76. PubMed ID: 29690922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating techniques for metagenome annotation using simulated sequence data.
    Randle-Boggis RJ; Helgason T; Sapp M; Ashton PD
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 92(7):. PubMed ID: 27162180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. MIPE: A metagenome-based community structure explorer and SSU primer evaluation tool.
    Zou B; Li J; Zhou Q; Quan ZX
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174609. PubMed ID: 28350876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. qPortal: A platform for data-driven biomedical research.
    Mohr C; Friedrich A; Wojnar D; Kenar E; Polatkan AC; Codrea MC; Czemmel S; Kohlbacher O; Nahnsen S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0191603. PubMed ID: 29352322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Variability in Metagenomic Count Data and Its Influence on the Identification of Differentially Abundant Genes.
    Jonsson V; Österlund T; Nerman O; Kristiansson E
    J Comput Biol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):311-326. PubMed ID: 27892712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Species classifier choice is a key consideration when analysing low-complexity food microbiome data.
    Walsh AM; Crispie F; O'Sullivan O; Finnegan L; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
    Microbiome; 2018 Mar; 6(1):50. PubMed ID: 29554948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. systemPipeR: NGS workflow and report generation environment.
    H Backman TW; Girke T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 17():388. PubMed ID: 27650223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A review of methods and databases for metagenomic classification and assembly.
    Breitwieser FP; Lu J; Salzberg SL
    Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jul; 20(4):1125-1136. PubMed ID: 29028872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Review of Web-Based Metagenomics Platforms for Analysing Next-Generation Sequence Data.
    Achudhan AB; Kannan P; Gupta A; Saleena LM
    Biochem Genet; 2024 Apr; 62(2):621-632. PubMed ID: 37507643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Investigating reproducibility and tracking provenance - A genomic workflow case study.
    Kanwal S; Khan FZ; Lonie A; Sinnott RO
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):337. PubMed ID: 28701218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Swapping Metagenomics Preprocessing Pipeline Components Offers Speed and Sensitivity Increases.
    Armstrong G; Martino C; Morris J; Khaleghi B; Kang J; DeReus J; Zhu Q; Roush D; McDonald D; Gonazlez A; Shaffer JP; Carpenter C; Estaki M; Wandro S; Eilert S; Akel A; Eno J; Curewitz K; Swafford AD; Moshiri N; Rosing T; Knight R
    mSystems; 2022 Apr; 7(2):e0137821. PubMed ID: 35293792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Compressive biological sequence analysis and archival in the era of high-throughput sequencing technologies.
    Giancarlo R; Rombo SE; Utro F
    Brief Bioinform; 2014 May; 15(3):390-406. PubMed ID: 24347576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Metagenome analysis using the Kraken software suite.
    Lu J; Rincon N; Wood DE; Breitwieser FP; Pockrandt C; Langmead B; Salzberg SL; Steinegger M
    Nat Protoc; 2022 Dec; 17(12):2815-2839. PubMed ID: 36171387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.