These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29029696)

  • 1. Perceived critical success factors of electronic health record system implementation in a dental clinic context: An organisational management perspective.
    Sidek YH; Martins JT
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Nov; 107():88-100. PubMed ID: 29029696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based management of ambulatory electronic health record system implementation: an assessment of conceptual support and qualitative evidence.
    McAlearney AS; Hefner JL; Sieck C; Rizer M; Huerta TR
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Jul; 83(7):484-94. PubMed ID: 24862893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electronic health records implementation: an evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors.
    Nguyen L; Bellucci E; Nguyen LT
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Nov; 83(11):779-96. PubMed ID: 25085286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: approach, results, and success factors.
    Bossen C; Jensen LG; Udsen FW
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Oct; 82(10):940-53. PubMed ID: 23827768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bringing service design to the development of health information systems: The case of the Portuguese national electronic health record.
    Grenha Teixeira J; Pinho NF; Patrício L
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Dec; 132():103942. PubMed ID: 31627031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eliciting end-user expectations to guide the implementation process of a new electronic health record: A case study using concept mapping.
    Joukes E; Cornet R; de Bruijne MC; de Keizer NF
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Mar; 87():111-7. PubMed ID: 26806718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electronic health record conversion in a private dental school.
    Fredekind R
    J Am Coll Dent; 2010; 77(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 20481067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors influencing implementation and outcomes of a dental electronic patient record system.
    Walji MF; Taylor D; Langabeer JR; Valenza JA
    J Dent Educ; 2009 May; 73(5):589-600. PubMed ID: 19433534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Top ten challenges when interfacing a laboratory information system to an electronic health record: Experience at a large academic medical center.
    Petrides AK; Tanasijevic MJ; Goonan EM; Landman AB; Kantartjis M; Bates DW; Melanson SEF
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Oct; 106():9-16. PubMed ID: 28870384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implementing unique device identification in electronic health record systems: organizational, workflow, and technological challenges.
    Campion TR; Johnson SB; Paxton EW; Mushlin AI; Sedrakyan A
    Med Care; 2014 Jan; 52(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 24322986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefiting from ambulatory EHR implementation: solidarity, six sigma, and willingness to strive.
    Zaroukian MH; Sierra A
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2006; 20(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 16429959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Envisioning electronic health record systems as change management: the experience of an English hospital joining the National Programme for Information Technology.
    Takian A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():901-5. PubMed ID: 22874323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implementation of a nationwide electronic health record (EHR).
    Fragidis LL; Chatzoglou PD
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2018 Mar; 31(2):116-130. PubMed ID: 29504871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
    Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrating data from an online diabetes prevention program into an electronic health record and clinical workflow, a design phase usability study.
    Mishuris RG; Yoder J; Wilson D; Mann D
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jul; 16():88. PubMed ID: 27401606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring Factors Affecting Voluntary Adoption of Electronic Medical Records Among Physicians and Clinical Assistants of Small or Solo Private General Practice Clinics.
    Or C; Tong E; Tan J; Chan S
    J Med Syst; 2018 May; 42(7):121. PubMed ID: 29845400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the adoption of electronic health records in North Carolina and South Carolina HIV systems.
    Belden CM; Proeschold-Bell RJ
    South Med J; 2010 Nov; 103(11):1115-8. PubMed ID: 20859247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of electronic health records on collaborative work routines: A narrative network analysis.
    Chao CA
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Oct; 94():100-11. PubMed ID: 27573317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of an electronic health record operating room management system in ophthalmology on documentation time, surgical volume, and staffing.
    Sanders DS; Read-Brown S; Tu DC; Lambert WE; Choi D; Almario BM; Yackel TR; Brown AS; Chiang MF
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 132(5):586-92. PubMed ID: 24676217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a tripolar model of technology acceptance: Hospital-based physicians' perspective on EHR.
    Beglaryan M; Petrosyan V; Bunker E
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jun; 102():50-61. PubMed ID: 28495348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.