239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29030653)
1. Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement: a systematic review of reasons for failure.
Ernstbrunner L; Imam MA; Andronic O; Perz T; Wieser K; Fucentese SF
Int Orthop; 2018 Aug; 42(8):1827-1833. PubMed ID: 29030653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Why Do Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties Fail Today?
van der List JP; Zuiderbaan HA; Pearle AD
J Arthroplasty; 2016 May; 31(5):1016-21. PubMed ID: 26725134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disease progression, aseptic loosening and bearing dislocations are the main revision indications after lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.
Tay ML; Matthews BG; Monk AP; Young SW
J ISAKOS; 2022 Oct; 7(5):132-141. PubMed ID: 35777698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision indications for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.
Tay ML; McGlashan SR; Monk AP; Young SW
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 Feb; 142(2):301-314. PubMed ID: 33630155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Survivorship of fixed vs mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sixty-four studies and National Joint Registries.
Abu Al-Rub Z; Lamb JN; West RM; Yang X; Hu Y; Pandit HG
Knee; 2020 Oct; 27(5):1635-1644. PubMed ID: 33010783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of articular and backside polyethylene wear in mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement.
Teeter MG; Howard JL; McCalden RW; Naudie DD
Knee; 2017 Mar; 24(2):429-433. PubMed ID: 28189405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Why Do Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties Fail Today?
van der List JP; Zuiderbaan HA; Pearle AD
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2016; 45(7):432-462. PubMed ID: 28005097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fixed- versus mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
Zhang W; Wang J; Li H; Wang W; George DM; Huang T
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19075. PubMed ID: 33154502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cementless unicompartmental knee replacement achieves better ten-year clinical outcomes than cemented: a systematic review.
Mohammad HR; Bullock GS; Kennedy JA; Mellon SJ; Murray D; Judge A
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Oct; 29(10):3229-3245. PubMed ID: 32613336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bearing design influences short- to mid-term survivorship, but not functional outcomes following lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.
Burger JA; Kleeblad LJ; Sierevelt IN; Horstmann WG; Nolte PA
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Jul; 27(7):2276-2288. PubMed ID: 30689001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Medial mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early survivorship and analysis of failures in 1000 consecutive cases.
Bergeson AG; Berend KR; Lombardi AV; Hurst JM; Morris MJ; Sneller MA
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9 Suppl):172-5. PubMed ID: 23523498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.
Hofstede SN; Nouta KA; Jacobs W; van Hooff ML; Wymenga AB; Pijls BG; Nelissen RG; Marang-van de Mheen PJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Feb; 2015(2):CD003130. PubMed ID: 25650566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Why do patellofemoral arthroplasties fail today? A systematic review.
van der List JP; Chawla H; Villa JC; Pearle AD
Knee; 2017 Jan; 24(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 27825938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Management of the Failed Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.
Crawford DA; Berend KR; Lombardi AV
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2018 Oct; 26(20):e426-e433. PubMed ID: 30113345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early results of a domed tibia, mobile bearing lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty from an independent centre.
Altuntas AO; Alsop H; Cobb JP
Knee; 2013 Dec; 20(6):466-70. PubMed ID: 23274066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modes of failure and revision of failed lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasties.
Citak M; Cross MB; Gehrke T; Dersch K; Kendoff D
Knee; 2015 Sep; 22(4):338-40. PubMed ID: 25887341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medial Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Young Patients Aged Less Than or Equal to 50 Years.
Greco NJ; Lombardi AV; Price AJ; Berend ME; Berend KR
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Aug; 33(8):2435-2439. PubMed ID: 29705680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fixed-bearing is superior to mobile-bearing in lateral unicompartmental knee replacement: a retrospective matched-pairs analysis.
Hariri M; Zahn N; Mick P; Jaber A; Reiner T; Renkawitz T; Innmann M; Walker T
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Sep; 31(9):3947-3955. PubMed ID: 37093235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Late Mobile-Bearing Dislocation in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.
Song MH; Kim KT; Hwang YS; Kim JW; Eom TW; Chae JH
Orthopedics; 2019 Jan; 42(1):e124-e127. PubMed ID: 30321443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of the Lateral Domed Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement: An Analysis From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man.
Mohammad HR; Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jan; 36(1):107-111. PubMed ID: 32773270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
