BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29031368)

  • 1. Chapter 6 Non-Squamous Cell Causes of Cervical Lymphadenopathy.
    Agarwal M; Nabavizadeh SA; Mohan S
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2017 Oct; 38(5):516-530. PubMed ID: 29031368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sonographic assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: role of high-resolution and color Doppler imaging.
    Gupta A; Rahman K; Shahid M; Kumar A; Qaseem SM; Hassan SA; Siddiqui FA
    Head Neck; 2011 Mar; 33(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 20652889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imaging evaluation of lymphadenopathy and patterns of lymph node spread in head and neck cancer.
    Forghani R; Yu E; Levental M; Som PM; Curtin HD
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2015 Feb; 15(2):207-24. PubMed ID: 25385488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sonographic differentiation between lymphatic and metastatic diseases in cervical lymphadenopathy.
    Strassen U; Geisweid C; Hofauer B; Knopf A
    Laryngoscope; 2018 Apr; 128(4):859-863. PubMed ID: 28833206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The lymph node roundness index in the evaluation of lymph nodes of the neck.
    Krišto B; Buljan M
    Coll Antropol; 2015 Mar; 39(1):165-9. PubMed ID: 26040085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic Accuracy of Computer-Aided Assessment of Intranodal Vascularity in Distinguishing Different Causes of Cervical Lymphadenopathy.
    Ying M; Cheng SC; Ahuja AT
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):2010-6. PubMed ID: 27131839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the efficacy of colour Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy.
    Dangore SB; Degwekar SS; Bhowate RR
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 18460573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imaging of cervical lymphadenopathy.
    Kaji AV; Mohuchy T; Swartz JD
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1997 Jun; 18(3):220-49. PubMed ID: 9253085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can magnetic resonance spectroscopy differentiate malignant and benign causes of lymphadenopathy? An in-vitro approach.
    Buré L; Boucher LM; Blumenkrantz M; Schob S; Lafaye de Micheaux P; Reinhold C; Gallix B
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182169. PubMed ID: 28792506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Volume of cervical lymph nodes using 3D ultrasonography. Differentiation of metastatic from reactive lymphadenopathy in primary head and neck malignancy.
    Kim HC; Han MH; Do KH; Kim KH; Choi HJ; Kim AY; Sung MW; Chang KH
    Acta Radiol; 2002 Nov; 43(6):571-4. PubMed ID: 12485253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of sonographic vascular features in differentiating different causes of cervical lymphadenopathy.
    Ying M; Ahuja A; Brook F
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):441-7. PubMed ID: 15121245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distinction between benign and malignant causes of cervical, axillary, and inguinal lymphadenopathy: value of Doppler spectral waveform analysis.
    Choi MY; Lee JW; Jang KJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):981-4. PubMed ID: 7677005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utility of color Doppler ultrasound in evaluating the status of cervical lymph nodes in oral cancer.
    Dangore-Khasbage S; Degwekar SS; Bhowate RR; Banode PJ; Bhake A; Choudhary MS; Lohe VK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 19272807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chapter 5 Ultrasound Characteristics of Benign vs Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes.
    Prativadi R; Dahiya N; Kamaya A; Bhatt S
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2017 Oct; 38(5):506-515. PubMed ID: 29031367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Ultrasound evaluation of characteristics of cervical lymph nodes with special reference to color Doppler ultrasound. A contribution to differentiating reactive from metastatic lymph node involvement in the neck].
    Issing PR; Kettling T; Kempf HG; Heermann R; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Oct; 78(10):566-72. PubMed ID: 10595342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical lymphadenopathy: ratio of long- to short-axis diameter as a predictor of malignancy.
    Steinkamp HJ; Cornehl M; Hosten N; Pegios W; Vogl T; Felix R
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Mar; 68(807):266-70. PubMed ID: 7735765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differentiation of lymphomatous, metastatic, and non-malignant lymphadenopathy in the neck with quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Payabvash S; Brackett A; Forghani R; Malhotra A
    Neuroradiology; 2019 Aug; 61(8):897-910. PubMed ID: 31175398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary Evaluation of Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification for Differential Diagnosis of Metastatic and Nonmetastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes.
    Zhao Y; Xi J; Zhao B; Xiong W; Jiang D; Yang L; Cai Z; Liu T; Jiang H; Rong S; Jin X
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Mar; 36(3):557-563. PubMed ID: 28127781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An overview of neck node sonography.
    Ahuja A; Ying M
    Invest Radiol; 2002 Jun; 37(6):333-42. PubMed ID: 12021590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasonography of abnormal neck lymph nodes.
    Chan JM; Shin LK; Jeffrey RB
    Ultrasound Q; 2007 Mar; 23(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 17558229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.