These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29031368)

  • 21. Use of core biopsy in diagnosing cervical lymphadenopathy: a viable alternative to surgical excisional biopsy of lymph nodes?
    Allin D; David S; Jacob A; Mir N; Giles A; Gibbins N
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2017 Mar; 99(3):242-244. PubMed ID: 27917669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Axillary lymph nodes: mammographic, pathologic, and clinical correlation.
    Walsh R; Kornguth PJ; Soo MS; Bentley R; DeLong DM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jan; 168(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 8976915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification Shear Wave Elastography: Prospective Assessment of Cervical Lymph Nodes.
    Cheng KL; Choi YJ; Shim WH; Lee JH; Baek JH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 42(2):378-86. PubMed ID: 26553206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ultrasonic evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy.
    Chang DB; Yang PC; Luh KT; Wu HD; Lee LN; Kuo SH; Lee YC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1990 Apr; 89(4):286-92. PubMed ID: 1976745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Vascular pathology of malignant cervical lymphadenopathy: qualitative and quantitative assessment with power Doppler ultrasound.
    Wu CH; Hsu MM; Chang YL; Hsieh FJ
    Cancer; 1998 Sep; 83(6):1189-96. PubMed ID: 9740085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The linear echogenic hilus in cervical lymphadenopathy--a sign of benignity or malignancy?
    Evans RM; Ahuja A; Metreweli C
    Clin Radiol; 1993 Apr; 47(4):262-4. PubMed ID: 8495573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymph nodes.
    Ahuja AT; Ying M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 May; 184(5):1691-9. PubMed ID: 15855141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability of Subjective Grading and Computer-Aided Assessment of Intranodal Vascularity in Differentiating Metastatic and Reactive Cervical Lymphadenopathy.
    Lam J; Ying M; Cheung SY; Yeung KH; Yu PH; Cheng HC; Ahuja AT
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 25140495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Imaging of head and neck lymph nodes.
    Eisenmenger LB; Wiggins RH
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2015 Jan; 53(1):115-32. PubMed ID: 25476176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Chapter 8 On the Horizon: Advanced Imaging Techniques to Improve Noninvasive Assessment of Cervical Lymph Nodes.
    Nabavizadeh SA; Chawla S; Agarwal M; Mohan S
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2017 Oct; 38(5):542-556. PubMed ID: 29031370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Distribution of intranodal vessels in differentiating benign from metastatic neck nodes.
    Ahuja AT; Ying M; Ho SS; Metreweli C
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Mar; 56(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 11247696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The utility of elastography and CEUS for the differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymphadenopathy. Three cases report.
    Fodor D; Pascu I; Pop S; Poanta L
    Med Ultrason; 2013 Mar; 15(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 23486627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. CT differentiation of enlarged mediastinal lymph node due to anthracosis from metastatic lymphadenopathy: a comparative study proven by endobronchial US-guided transbronchial needle aspiration.
    Kirchner J; Broll M; Müller P; Pomjanski N; Biesterfeld S; Liermann D; Kickuth R
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 25616268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The use of sonography in differentiating cervical lymphomatous lymph nodes from cervical metastatic lymph nodes.
    Ahuja A; Ying M; Yang WT; Evans R; King W; Metreweli C
    Clin Radiol; 1996 Mar; 51(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 8605749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Orofacial disease: update for the dental clinical team: 11. Cervical lymphadenopathy.
    Scully C; Porter S
    Dent Update; 2000; 27(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 11218266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of cervical lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
    Don DM; Anzai Y; Lufkin RB; Fu YS; Calcaterra TC
    Laryngoscope; 1995 Jul; 105(7 Pt 1):669-74. PubMed ID: 7603268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Silicone granuloma from ruptured breast implants as a cause of cervical lymphadenopathy.
    Borghol K; Gallagher G; Skelly BL
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2016 Sep; 98(7):e118-20. PubMed ID: 27167311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differentiation of benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes with color Doppler sonography.
    Chang DB; Yuan A; Yu CJ; Luh KT; Kuo SH; Yang PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8141027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of CEUS in characterization of superficial lymph nodes: a single center prospective study.
    de Stefano G; Scognamiglio U; Di Martino F; Parrella R; Scarano F; Signoriello G; Farella N
    Oncotarget; 2016 Aug; 7(32):52416-52422. PubMed ID: 27191746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Apparent diffusion coefficient values of necrotic and solid portion of lymph nodes: differential diagnostic value in cervical lymphadenopathy.
    Zhang Y; Chen J; Shen J; Zhong J; Ye R; Liang B
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Mar; 68(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 22316593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.