BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29031368)

  • 21. Use of core biopsy in diagnosing cervical lymphadenopathy: a viable alternative to surgical excisional biopsy of lymph nodes?
    Allin D; David S; Jacob A; Mir N; Giles A; Gibbins N
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2017 Mar; 99(3):242-244. PubMed ID: 27917669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Axillary lymph nodes: mammographic, pathologic, and clinical correlation.
    Walsh R; Kornguth PJ; Soo MS; Bentley R; DeLong DM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jan; 168(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 8976915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification Shear Wave Elastography: Prospective Assessment of Cervical Lymph Nodes.
    Cheng KL; Choi YJ; Shim WH; Lee JH; Baek JH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 42(2):378-86. PubMed ID: 26553206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ultrasonic evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy.
    Chang DB; Yang PC; Luh KT; Wu HD; Lee LN; Kuo SH; Lee YC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1990 Apr; 89(4):286-92. PubMed ID: 1976745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Vascular pathology of malignant cervical lymphadenopathy: qualitative and quantitative assessment with power Doppler ultrasound.
    Wu CH; Hsu MM; Chang YL; Hsieh FJ
    Cancer; 1998 Sep; 83(6):1189-96. PubMed ID: 9740085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The linear echogenic hilus in cervical lymphadenopathy--a sign of benignity or malignancy?
    Evans RM; Ahuja A; Metreweli C
    Clin Radiol; 1993 Apr; 47(4):262-4. PubMed ID: 8495573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymph nodes.
    Ahuja AT; Ying M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 May; 184(5):1691-9. PubMed ID: 15855141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability of Subjective Grading and Computer-Aided Assessment of Intranodal Vascularity in Differentiating Metastatic and Reactive Cervical Lymphadenopathy.
    Lam J; Ying M; Cheung SY; Yeung KH; Yu PH; Cheng HC; Ahuja AT
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 25140495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Imaging of head and neck lymph nodes.
    Eisenmenger LB; Wiggins RH
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2015 Jan; 53(1):115-32. PubMed ID: 25476176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Chapter 8 On the Horizon: Advanced Imaging Techniques to Improve Noninvasive Assessment of Cervical Lymph Nodes.
    Nabavizadeh SA; Chawla S; Agarwal M; Mohan S
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2017 Oct; 38(5):542-556. PubMed ID: 29031370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Distribution of intranodal vessels in differentiating benign from metastatic neck nodes.
    Ahuja AT; Ying M; Ho SS; Metreweli C
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Mar; 56(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 11247696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The utility of elastography and CEUS for the differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymphadenopathy. Three cases report.
    Fodor D; Pascu I; Pop S; Poanta L
    Med Ultrason; 2013 Mar; 15(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 23486627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. CT differentiation of enlarged mediastinal lymph node due to anthracosis from metastatic lymphadenopathy: a comparative study proven by endobronchial US-guided transbronchial needle aspiration.
    Kirchner J; Broll M; Müller P; Pomjanski N; Biesterfeld S; Liermann D; Kickuth R
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 25616268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The use of sonography in differentiating cervical lymphomatous lymph nodes from cervical metastatic lymph nodes.
    Ahuja A; Ying M; Yang WT; Evans R; King W; Metreweli C
    Clin Radiol; 1996 Mar; 51(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 8605749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Orofacial disease: update for the dental clinical team: 11. Cervical lymphadenopathy.
    Scully C; Porter S
    Dent Update; 2000; 27(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 11218266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of cervical lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
    Don DM; Anzai Y; Lufkin RB; Fu YS; Calcaterra TC
    Laryngoscope; 1995 Jul; 105(7 Pt 1):669-74. PubMed ID: 7603268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Silicone granuloma from ruptured breast implants as a cause of cervical lymphadenopathy.
    Borghol K; Gallagher G; Skelly BL
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2016 Sep; 98(7):e118-20. PubMed ID: 27167311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differentiation of benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes with color Doppler sonography.
    Chang DB; Yuan A; Yu CJ; Luh KT; Kuo SH; Yang PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8141027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of CEUS in characterization of superficial lymph nodes: a single center prospective study.
    de Stefano G; Scognamiglio U; Di Martino F; Parrella R; Scarano F; Signoriello G; Farella N
    Oncotarget; 2016 Aug; 7(32):52416-52422. PubMed ID: 27191746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Apparent diffusion coefficient values of necrotic and solid portion of lymph nodes: differential diagnostic value in cervical lymphadenopathy.
    Zhang Y; Chen J; Shen J; Zhong J; Ye R; Liang B
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Mar; 68(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 22316593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.