183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29031524)
1. Analysis of pelvic strain in different gait configurations in a validated cohort of computed tomography based finite element models.
Salo Z; Beek M; Wright D; Maloul A; Whyne CM
J Biomech; 2017 Nov; 64():120-130. PubMed ID: 29031524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed tomography landmark-based semi-automated mesh morphing and mapping techniques: generation of patient specific models of the human pelvis without segmentation.
Salo Z; Beek M; Wright D; Whyne CM
J Biomech; 2015 Apr; 48(6):1125-32. PubMed ID: 25680299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of pelvic shape on strain patterns: A computational analysis using finite element mesh morphing techniques.
Salo Z; Kreder H; Whyne CM
J Biomech; 2021 Feb; 116():110207. PubMed ID: 33422723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Impact of an Open-Book Pelvic Ring Injury on Bone Strain: Validation of a Finite Element Model and Analysis Within the Gait Cycle.
Salo Z; Kreder H; Whyne CM
J Biomech Eng; 2021 Jul; 143(7):. PubMed ID: 33704380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of mesh morphing and mapping techniques in patient specific modelling of the human pelvis.
Salo Z; Beek M; Whyne CM
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2012 Aug; 28(8):904-13. PubMed ID: 25099570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of mesh morphing and mapping techniques in patient specific modeling of the human pelvis.
Salo Z; Beek M; Whyne CM
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2013 Jan; 29(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 23293071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mesh-morphing algorithms for specimen-specific finite element modeling.
Sigal IA; Hardisty MR; Whyne CM
J Biomech; 2008; 41(7):1381-9. PubMed ID: 18397789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of boundary condition on the biomechanics of a human pelvic joint under an axial compressive load: a three-dimensional finite element model.
Hao Z; Wan C; Gao X; Ji T
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Oct; 133(10):101006. PubMed ID: 22070331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does spinopelvic alignment affect femoral head cartilage and the proximal femoral physis in slipped capital femoral epiphysis? A finite element analysis.
Kumaran Y; Mumtaz M; Quatman C; Balch-Samora J; Soehnlen S; Hoffman B; Tripathi S; Nishida N; Goel VK
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2024 Jun; 116():106269. PubMed ID: 38861874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D finite element model of the diabetic neuropathic foot: a gait analysis driven approach.
Guiotto A; Sawacha Z; Guarneri G; Avogaro A; Cobelli C
J Biomech; 2014 Sep; 47(12):3064-71. PubMed ID: 25113808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and validation of patient-specific finite element models of the hemipelvis generated from a sparse CT data set.
Shim VB; Pitto RP; Streicher RM; Hunter PJ; Anderson IA
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051010. PubMed ID: 19045517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Heel skin stiffness effect on the hind foot biomechanics during heel strike.
Gu Y; Li J; Ren X; Lake MJ; Zeng Y
Skin Res Technol; 2010 Aug; 16(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 20636997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A subject-specific integrative biomechanical framework of the pelvis for gait analysis.
Ravera EP; Crespo MJ; Catalfamo Formento PA
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2018 Nov; 232(11):1083-1097. PubMed ID: 30280643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the generality and accuracy of a new mesh morphing procedure for the human femur.
Grassi L; Hraiech N; Schileo E; Ansaloni M; Rochette M; Viceconti M
Med Eng Phys; 2011 Jan; 33(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 21036655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of computed tomography based parametric and patient-specific finite element models of the healthy and metastatic spine using a mesh-morphing algorithm.
O'Reilly MA; Whyne CM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(17):1876-81. PubMed ID: 18670341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of the mechanical behaviour of the plantar soft tissue during gait cycle: Experimental and numerical activities.
Fontanella CG; Forestiero A; Carniel EL; Natali AN
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 Oct; 229(10):713-20. PubMed ID: 26405096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The finite element modeling of human pelvis and its application in medicolegal expertise].
Li ZD; Zou DH; Liu NG; Huang P; Chen YJ
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 26(6):406-12. PubMed ID: 21425599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subject-specific finite element model of the pelvis: development, validation and sensitivity studies.
Anderson AE; Peters CL; Tuttle BD; Weiss JA
J Biomech Eng; 2005 Jun; 127(3):364-73. PubMed ID: 16060343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a human cadaveric tibia.
Gray HA; Taddei F; Zavatsky AB; Cristofolini L; Gill HS
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031016. PubMed ID: 18532865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
