These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29031529)
1. Enhanced Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Skeletal Class III Facial Asymmetry by 3-Dimensional Surgical Simulation. Ko EW; Lin CH; Chen YA; Chen YR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 May; 76(5):1073-1083. PubMed ID: 29031529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional surgical simulation produce better surgical outcomes among patients with class III facial asymmetry? Udomlarptham N; Lin CH; Wang YC; Ko EW Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 47(8):1022-1031. PubMed ID: 29606563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Site and severity of facial asymmetry after bimaxillary surgery for class III deformity: a case-control study. Wang TH; Chen YF; Chen YA; Yao CF; Xi T; Liao YF; Chen YR Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):334. PubMed ID: 38780816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Volumetric changes in the upper airway after bimaxillary surgery for skeletal class III malocclusions: a case series study using 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography. Lee Y; Chun YS; Kang N; Kim M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 70(12):2867-75. PubMed ID: 22682739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery for correction of facial asymmetry: results of a randomised controlled clinical trial. De Riu G; Meloni SM; Baj A; Corda A; Soma D; Tullio A Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 52(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 24418178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dentoskeletal parameters related to visual perception of facial asymmetry in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion after orthognathic surgery. Lin CW; Wang YC; Chen YH; Ko EW Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 47(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 28822677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Orthognathic treatment of asymmetry: two cases of "waferless" stereotactic maxillary positioning. Sadiq Z; Collyer J; Sneddon K; Walsh S Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 50(2):e27-9. PubMed ID: 21839556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maxillary yaw as the primary predictor of maxillary dental midline deviation: 3D analysis using cone-beam computed tomography. Song WW; Kim SS; Sándor GK; Kim YD J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 71(4):752-62. PubMed ID: 23010372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anterior Decompensation Using Segmental Osteotomy for Patients With Mandibular Asymmetry. Kim HH; Ha HR; Ahn HW; Kim SJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1392.e1-22. PubMed ID: 25891660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Orthognathic positioning system: intraoperative system to transfer virtual surgical plan to operating field during orthognathic surgery. Polley JW; Figueroa AA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 71(5):911-20. PubMed ID: 23312847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of Mandible-First versus Maxilla-First Approach and of Thick versus Thin Splints for Skeletal Position after Two-Jaw Orthognathic Surgery. Borikanphanitphaisan T; Lin CH; Chen YA; Ko EW Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 147(2):421-431. PubMed ID: 33235045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stability of Le Fort I Osteotomy With Propeller Graft for Canting Correction in Facial Asymmetry. Lee JY; Kim YI; Kang HJ; Song JM; Park SB; Kim JR J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):2077-80. PubMed ID: 26468788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional effect of pitch, roll, and yaw rotations on maxillomandibular complex movement. Kim SJ; Lee KJ; Yu HS; Jung YS; Baik HS J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):264-73. PubMed ID: 25557879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The accuracy and stability of the maxillary position after orthognathic surgery using a novel computer-aided surgical simulation system. Kim JW; Kim JC; Jeong CG; Cheon KJ; Cho SW; Park IY; Yang BE BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):18. PubMed ID: 30646896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Skeletal stability after bimaxillary surgery with surgery-first approach for class III asymmetry is not related to virtual surgical occlusal contact. Liao YF; Atipatyakul P; Chen YH; Chen YA; Yao CF; Chen YR Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jul; 26(7):4935-4945. PubMed ID: 35313356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery? Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The evaluation of the nasal morphologic changes after bimaxillary surgery in skeletal class III maloccusion by using the superimposition of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) volumes. Park SB; Yoon JK; Kim YI; Hwang DS; Cho BH; Son WS J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 40(4):e87-92. PubMed ID: 21727011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography-based virtual treatment planning and fabrication of a surgical splint for asymmetric patients: surgery first approach. Uribe F; Janakiraman N; Shafer D; Nanda R Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):748-58. PubMed ID: 24182591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery combined with fibular osteomyocutaneous flap reconstruction to correct facial asymmetry and maxillary defects secondary to maxillectomy in childhood. Zhang L; Sun H; Yu HB; Yuan H; Shen GF; Wang XD J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):886-9. PubMed ID: 23714902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]