BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29031706)

  • 1. Early Outcomes with Rapid-deployment vs Stented Biological Valves: A Propensity-match Analysis.
    Nguyen A; Stevens LM; Bouchard D; Demers P; Perrault LP; Carrier M
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018; 30(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 29031706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of a Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Versus Its Conventional Counterpart: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.
    Wahlers TCW; Andreas M; Rahmanian P; Candolfi P; Zemanova B; Giot C; Ferrari E; Laufer G
    Innovations (Phila); 2018; 13(3):177-183. PubMed ID: 29912142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement with the Perceval S and Intuity Elite.
    Liakopoulos OJ; Gerfer S; Rahmanian P; Eghbalzadeh K; Djordjevic I; Schlachtenberger G; Zeriouh M; Mader N; Choi YH; Wahlers T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021 Aug; 69(5):412-419. PubMed ID: 33099764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early-Term Results of Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement versus Standard Bioprosthesis Implantation Combined with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
    Taghiyev ZT; Bechtel M; Schlömicher M; Useini D; Taghi HN; Moustafine V; Strauch JT
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Oct; 71(7):519-527. PubMed ID: 35151232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Northern New England Rapid Deployment Valve Experience: Survival and Procedural Outcomes From 2015 to 2021.
    Fallon JM; Malenka DJ; Ross CS; Ramkumar N; Seshasayee SM; Westbrook BM; Hirashima F; Quinn RD
    Innovations (Phila); 2024; 19(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 38318656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemodynamic Comparison of Sutureless and Rapid-Deployment Valves with Conventional Bioprostheses.
    Gotzmann M; Wilbring M; Charitos E; Treede H; Silaschi M
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Oct; 68(7):584-594. PubMed ID: 30900219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Haemodynamic benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement via a minimally invasive approach: 1-year results of a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial.
    Borger MA; Dohmen PM; Knosalla C; Hammerschmidt R; Merk DR; Richter M; Doenst T; Conradi L; Treede H; Moustafine V; Holzhey DM; Duhay F; Strauch J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Oct; 50(4):713-720. PubMed ID: 26935407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mini-aortic surgery with percutaneous cannulation and rapid-deployment valve.
    Bruno P; Farina P; Cammertoni F; Biondi R; Perri G; Di Cesare A; Crea F; Massetti M
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2016 Jul; 24(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 27286783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sutureless Perceval aortic valve in comparison with the stented Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve.
    König KC; Wahlers T; Scherner M; Wippermann J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Mar; 23(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 25076560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct Comparison of the Edwards Intuity Elite and Sorin Perceval S Rapid Deployment Aortic Valves.
    Liakopoulos OJ; Gerfer S; Weider S; Rahmanian P; Zeriouh M; Eghbalzadeh K; Sabashnikov A; Choi YH; Wippermann J; Wahlers T
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2018 Jan; 105(1):108-114. PubMed ID: 29042007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical sutureless and transcatheter aortic valves: hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes in propensity score-matched high-risk populations with severe aortic stenosis.
    Kamperidis V; van Rosendael PJ; de Weger A; Katsanos S; Regeer M; van der Kley F; Mertens B; Sianos G; Ajmone Marsan N; Bax JJ; Delgado V
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(5):670-7. PubMed ID: 25946438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rapid deployment or sutureless versus conventional bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis.
    Sohn SH; Jang MJ; Hwang HY; Kim KH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jun; 155(6):2402-2412.e5. PubMed ID: 29548584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early and Late Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement with Aortic Annular Enlargement: A Propensity Analysis.
    Okamoto Y; Yamamoto K; Sugimoto T; Yoshii S
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Aug; 64(5):410-7. PubMed ID: 26334242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of sutureless aortic valves in minimally invasive cardiac surgery: an evolution of the surgical technique.
    Pfeiffer S; Dell'aquila AM; Vogt F; Kalisnik JM; Sirch J; Fischlein T; Santarpino G
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Oct; 58(5):731-738. PubMed ID: 27385418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. One-year outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial: a prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System.
    Kocher AA; Laufer G; Haverich A; Shrestha M; Walther T; Misfeld M; Kempfert J; Gillam L; Schmitz C; Wahlers TC; Wippermann J; Mohr FW; Roth M; Skwara A; Rahmanian P; Wiedemann D; Borger MA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Jan; 145(1):110-5; discussion 115-6. PubMed ID: 23058665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treating the patients in the 'grey-zone' with aortic valve disease: a comparison among conventional surgery, sutureless valves and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Muneretto C; Bisleri G; Moggi A; Di Bacco L; Tespili M; Repossini A; Rambaldini M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 20(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 25320140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Right anterior minithoracotomy aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: Early outcomes and 1-year follow-up from 2 European centers.
    Vola M; Albertini A; Campisi S; Caprili L; Fuzellier JF; Favre JP; Morel J; Gerbay A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1052-7. PubMed ID: 25648481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
    Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement: Excellent Results and Increased Effective Orifice Areas.
    Rahmanian PB; Kaya S; Eghbalzadeh K; Menghesha H; Madershahian N; Wahlers T
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2018 Jan; 105(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 29132703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conventional surgery, sutureless valves, and transapical aortic valve replacement: what is the best option for patients with aortic valve stenosis? A multicenter, propensity-matched analysis.
    D'Onofrio A; Rizzoli G; Messina A; Alfieri O; Lorusso R; Salizzoni S; Glauber M; Di Bartolomeo R; Besola L; Rinaldi M; Troise G; Gerosa G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Nov; 146(5):1065-70; discussion 1070-1. PubMed ID: 24021955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.