399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29032176)
1. Three-dimensional evaluation of marginal and internal fit of 3D-printed interim restorations fabricated on different finish line designs.
Alharbi N; Alharbi S; Cuijpers VMJI; Osman RB; Wismeijer D
J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):218-226. PubMed ID: 29032176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM crowns with different finish lines by using a micro-CT technique.
Rizonaki M; Jacquet W; Bottenberg P; Depla L; Boone M; De Coster PJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):890-898. PubMed ID: 33541816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Micro-CT analysis of 3D printed provisional crowns fitting.
Alsubaiy EF
Technol Health Care; 2023; 31(1):259-268. PubMed ID: 36057803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal and Internal Gap of Handmade, Milled and 3D Printed Additive Manufactured Patterns for Pressed Lithium Disilicate Onlay Restorations.
Revilla-León M; Olea-Vielba M; Esteso-Saiz A; Martínez-Klemm I; Özcan M
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 26(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 29461746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal and internal fit of provisional crowns fabricated using 3D printing technology.
Chaturvedi S; Alqahtani NM; Addas MK; Alfarsi MA
Technol Health Care; 2020; 28(6):635-642. PubMed ID: 32280071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the Adaptation of Interim Crowns using Different Measurement Techniques.
Peng CC; Chung KH; Ramos V
J Prosthodont; 2020 Jan; 29(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 31702087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of finish line design and metal alloy on the marginal and internal gaps of selective laser melting printed copings.
Al Maaz A; Thompson GA; Drago C; An H; Berzins D
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):143-151. PubMed ID: 30948295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of Dental Restorations Fabricated Using Milling vs 3D-Printed Molds: A Pilot Study.
Ahlholm P; Sipilä K; Tarvonen PL; Silvast T; Lappalainen R
Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(7):79-88. PubMed ID: 38498860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of trial restorations from virtual planning: A comparison of two fabrication techniques.
Ortensi L; Lo Castro E; Rapisarda E; Pedullà E
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):425-429. PubMed ID: 33317829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fit of anterior restorations made of 3D-printed and milled zirconia: An in-vitro study.
Rues S; Zehender N; Zenthöfer A; Bömicke W; Herpel C; Ilani A; Erber R; Roser C; Lux CJ; Rammelsberg P; Schwindling FS
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104415. PubMed ID: 36640843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A micro-computed tomography analysis of internal and marginal fits of fixed partial dentures: Effect of preparation finish line designs on monolithic zirconia and heat-pressed zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate.
Elsherbini M; Sakrana AA; Amin RA; Diaa M; Özcan M; Al-Zordk W
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):90-99. PubMed ID: 36718906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal Gap of Milled versus Cast Gold Restorations.
Johnson R; Verrett R; Haney S; Mansueto M; Challa S
J Prosthodont; 2017 Jan; 26(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 26845495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of different finish line preparations on the marginal and internal adaptation of cobalt-chromium metal alloy copings fabricated by using CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shah N; Badwaik P; Sheth VH; Bhatnagar V; Bhanushali N; Patil P
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 May; 127(5):716-728.e6. PubMed ID: 34716012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of design software program and manufacturing method on the marginal and internal adaptation of esthetic crowns for primary teeth: A microcomputed tomography evaluation.
Aktaş N; Bani M; Ocak M; Bankoğlu Güngör M
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; 131(3):519.e1-519.e9. PubMed ID: 38195256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Micro-CT analysis of marginal and internal fit of milled and pressed polyetheretherketone single crowns.
Attia MA; Blunt L; Bills P; Tawfik A; Radawn M
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):906.e1-906.e10. PubMed ID: 37072286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
Hamza TA; Sherif RM
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal and internal adaptation of milled cobalt-chromium copings.
Kane LM; Chronaios D; Sierraalta M; George FM
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 26182851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal Discrepancies of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: The Influence of Preparation Designs and Sintering Techniques.
Ahmed WM; Abdallah MN; McCullagh AP; Wyatt CCL; Troczynski T; Carvalho RM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):288-298. PubMed ID: 30656786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
