192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29032437)
1. Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare Discrete Choice Experiments: A Primer.
Vass CM; Wright S; Burton M; Payne K
Patient; 2018 Apr; 11(2):167-173. PubMed ID: 29032437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare-Related Discrete Choice Experiments when Comparing Stated Preferences: A Systematic Review.
Wright SJ; Vass CM; Sim G; Burton M; Fiebig DG; Payne K
Patient; 2018 Oct; 11(5):475-488. PubMed ID: 29492903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Harrison M; Milbers K; Hudson M; Bansback N
BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e014719. PubMed ID: 28515194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are Healthcare Choices Predictable? The Impact of Discrete Choice Experiment Designs and Models.
de Bekker-Grob EW; Swait JD; Kassahun HT; Bliemer MCJ; Jonker MF; Veldwijk J; Cong K; Rose JM; Donkers B
Value Health; 2019 Sep; 22(9):1050-1062. PubMed ID: 31511182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using blocked fractional factorial designs to construct discrete choice experiments for healthcare studies.
Jaynes J; Wong WK; Xu H
Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(15):2543-60. PubMed ID: 26823156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Current Practices for Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.
Karim S; Craig BM; Vass C; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Oct; 40(10):943-956. PubMed ID: 35960434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review.
Vass C; Gray E; Payne K
Int J Clin Pharm; 2016 Jun; 38(3):620-30. PubMed ID: 26610687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stakeholders' preferences for the design and delivery of virtual care services: A systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Vo LK; Allen MJ; Cunich M; Thillainadesan J; McPhail SM; Sharma P; Wallis S; McGowan K; Carter HE
Soc Sci Med; 2024 Jan; 340():116459. PubMed ID: 38048738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discrete choice analysis of health worker job preferences in Ethiopia: Separating attribute non-attendance from taste heterogeneity.
Arora N; Quaife M; Hanson K; Lagarde M; Woldesenbet D; Seifu A; Crastes Dit Sourd R
Health Econ; 2022 May; 31(5):806-819. PubMed ID: 35178825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity.
Quaife M; Terris-Prestholt F; Di Tanna GL; Vickerman P
Eur J Health Econ; 2018 Nov; 19(8):1053-1066. PubMed ID: 29380229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability?
Janssen EM; Marshall DA; Hauber AB; Bridges JFP
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2017 Dec; 17(6):531-542. PubMed ID: 29058478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Discrete-Choice Experiments: An ISPOR Special Interest Group Report.
Vass C; Boeri M; Karim S; Marshall D; Craig B; Ho KA; Mott D; Ngorsuraches S; Badawy SM; Mühlbacher A; Gonzalez JM; Heidenreich S
Value Health; 2022 May; 25(5):685-694. PubMed ID: 35500943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preferences for aspects of antenatal and newborn screening: a systematic review.
Vass CM; Georgsson S; Ulph F; Payne K
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Apr; 19(1):131. PubMed ID: 30991967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Choice Experiments to Quantify Preferences for Health and Healthcare: State of the Practice.
Mühlbacher A; Johnson FR
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Jun; 14(3):253-66. PubMed ID: 26992386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Discrete choice experiments in pharmacy: a review of the literature.
Naik-Panvelkar P; Armour C; Saini B
Int J Pharm Pract; 2013 Feb; 21(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 23301529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.
Clark MD; Determann D; Petrou S; Moro D; de Bekker-Grob EW
Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Sep; 32(9):883-902. PubMed ID: 25005924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methods for Conducting Stated Preference Research with Children and Adolescents in Health: A Scoping Review of the Application of Discrete Choice Experiments.
Michaels-Igbokwe C; Currie GR; Kennedy BL; MacDonald KV; Marshall DA
Patient; 2021 Nov; 14(6):741-758. PubMed ID: 34008164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are Efficient Designs Used in Discrete Choice Experiments Too Difficult for Some Respondents? A Case Study Eliciting Preferences for End-of-Life Care.
Flynn TN; Bilger M; Malhotra C; Finkelstein EA
Pharmacoeconomics; 2016 Mar; 34(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 26589411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigating the Heterogeneity in Women's Preferences for Breast Screening: Does the Communication of Risk Matter?
Vass CM; Rigby D; Payne K
Value Health; 2018 Feb; 21(2):219-228. PubMed ID: 29477404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.
Soekhai V; de Bekker-Grob EW; Ellis AR; Vass CM
Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Feb; 37(2):201-226. PubMed ID: 30392040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
