192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29032437)
21. Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review.
Salloum RG; Shenkman EA; Louviere JJ; Chambers DA
Implement Sci; 2017 Nov; 12(1):140. PubMed ID: 29169397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform the Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines: Are We Ready Yet?
Vass CM; Payne K
Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Sep; 35(9):859-866. PubMed ID: 28536955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Insights from triangulation of two purchase choice elicitation methods to predict social decision making in healthcare.
Whitty JA; Rundle-Thiele SR; Scuffham PA
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2012 Mar; 10(2):113-26. PubMed ID: 22201266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Methods to Summarize Discrete-Choice Experiments in a Systematic Review: A Scoping Review.
Choudhary D; Thomas M; Pacheco-Barrios K; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Schünemann H; Hazlewood G
Patient; 2022 Nov; 15(6):629-639. PubMed ID: 35829927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Modeling Heterogeneity in Patients' Preferences for Psoriasis Treatments in a Multicountry Study: A Comparison Between Random-Parameters Logit and Latent Class Approaches.
Boeri M; Saure D; Schacht A; Riedl E; Hauber B
Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Jun; 38(6):593-606. PubMed ID: 32128726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Designing Unforced Choice Experiments to Inform Health Care Decision Making: Implications of Using Opt-Out, Neither, or Status Quo Alternatives in Discrete Choice Experiments.
Determann D; Gyrd-Hansen D; de Wit GA; de Bekker-Grob EW; Steyerberg EW; Lambooij MS; Bjørnskov Pedersen L
Med Decis Making; 2019 Aug; 39(6):681-692. PubMed ID: 31354031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Discrete Choice Experiments to Elicit Patient Preferences for Decision Making in Transplantation.
James LJ; Wong G; Tong A; Craig JC; Howard K; Howell M
Transplantation; 2021 May; 105(5):960-967. PubMed ID: 33093407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Using discrete choice experiments to understand preferences in health care.
Pfarr C; Schmid A; Schneider U
Dev Health Econ Public Policy; 2014; 12():27-48. PubMed ID: 24864381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Preferences for accessing sexual health services among middle-aged and older adults in the UK: a study protocol for a discrete choice experiment using mixed methods.
Kpokiri E; Pan SW; Ong JJ; Greaves E; Khan J; Bowen S; Jannaway T; Terris-Prestholt F; Tanton C; Kuper H; Shakespeare T; Tucker JD; Wu D
BMJ Open; 2023 May; 13(5):e066783. PubMed ID: 37156584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does Controlling for Scale Heterogeneity Better Explain Respondents' Preference Segmentation in Discrete Choice Experiments? A Case Study of US Health Insurance Demand.
Karim S; Craig BM; Poteet S
Med Decis Making; 2021 Jul; 41(5):573-583. PubMed ID: 33703964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. What factors drive heterogeneity of preferences for micro-health insurance in rural Malawi?
Abiiro GA; Torbica A; Kwalamasa K; De Allegri M
Health Policy Plan; 2016 Nov; 31(9):1172-83. PubMed ID: 27175032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide.
de Bekker-Grob EW; Donkers B; Jonker MF; Stolk EA
Patient; 2015 Oct; 8(5):373-84. PubMed ID: 25726010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Using decision mapping to inform the development of a stated choice survey to elicit youth preferences for sexual and reproductive health and HIV services in rural Malawi.
Michaels-Igbokwe C; Lagarde M; Cairns J; Terris-Prestholt F
Soc Sci Med; 2014 Mar; 105():93-102. PubMed ID: 24509049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Should I stay or should I go home? A latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment on hospital-at-home.
Goossens LM; Utens CM; Smeenk FW; Donkers B; van Schayck OC; Rutten-van Mölken MP
Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):588-96. PubMed ID: 25128052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Testing the External Validity of a Discrete Choice Experiment Method: An Application to Latent Tuberculosis Infection Treatment.
Mohammadi T; Bansback N; Marra F; Khakban A; Campbell JR; FitzGerald JM; Lynd LD; Marra CA
Value Health; 2017; 20(7):969-975. PubMed ID: 28712627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Conducting a Discrete-Choice Experiment Study Following Recommendations for Good Research Practices: An Application for Eliciting Patient Preferences for Diabetes Treatments.
Janssen EM; Hauber AB; Bridges JFP
Value Health; 2018 Jan; 21(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 29304942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. What Do Patients Want from Otolaryngologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment.
Naunheim MR; Rathi VK; Naunheim ML; Alkire BC; Lam AC; Song PC; Shrime MG
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Oct; 157(4):618-624. PubMed ID: 28675119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. How Are Debriefing Questions Used in Health Discrete Choice Experiments? An Online Survey.
Pearce AM; Mulhern BJ; Watson V; Viney RC
Value Health; 2020 Mar; 23(3):289-293. PubMed ID: 32197722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. From Individual to Population Preferences: Comparison of Discrete Choice and Dirichlet Models for Treatment Benefit-Risk Tradeoffs.
Tervonen T; Pignatti F; Postmus D
Med Decis Making; 2019 Oct; 39(7):879-885. PubMed ID: 31496357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Discrete Choice Experiments.
Vass C; Rigby D; Payne K
Med Decis Making; 2017 Apr; 37(3):298-313. PubMed ID: 28061040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
