These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29032725)

  • 1. Percutaneous pedestals in cochlear implantation.
    Mitchell-Innes A; Irving R; Briggs R
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Jan; 19(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 29032725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of the Utah Artificial Ear project in the development of the modern cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF; Parkin JL
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 May; 16 Suppl 2():S1-S11. PubMed ID: 25941941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Rehabilitation of hearing-impaired patients with cochlear implants: a review].
    Gstoettner W; Adunka O; Hamzavi J; Baumgartner WD
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):464-72. PubMed ID: 10890122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards a Complete In Silico Assessment of the Outcome of Cochlear Implantation Surgery.
    Mangado N; Ceresa M; Benav H; Mistrik P; Piella G; González Ballester MA
    Mol Neurobiol; 2018 Jan; 55(1):173-186. PubMed ID: 28840488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Cochlear implant in adults].
    Bouccara D; Mosnier I; Bernardeschi D; Ferrary E; Sterkers O
    Rev Med Interne; 2012 Mar; 33(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 22217924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implantable microphones as an alternative to external microphones for cochlear implants.
    Mitchell-Innes A; Morse R; Irving R; Begg P
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Nov; 18(6):304-313. PubMed ID: 28889786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of cochlear implant surgical technique on post-operative electrode impedance.
    Gu P; Jiang Y; Gao X; Huang S; Yuan Y; Wang G; Li B; Xi X; Dai P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2016 Jul; 136(7):677-81. PubMed ID: 27049336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Future of Implantable Auditory Devices.
    Rhodes RM; Tsai Do BS
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2019 Apr; 52(2):363-378. PubMed ID: 30765092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Osteomyelitis, lateral sinus thrombosis, and temporal lobe infarction caused by infection of a percutaneous cochlear implant.
    Staecker H; Chow H; Nadol JB
    Am J Otol; 1999 Nov; 20(6):726-8. PubMed ID: 10565715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of an auditory implant manipulator for minimally invasive surgical insertion of implantable hearing devices.
    Stieger C; Caversaccio M; Arnold A; Zheng G; Salzmann J; Widmer D; Gerber N; Thurner M; Nauer C; Mussard Y; Kompis M; Nolte LP; Häusler R; Weber S
    J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Mar; 125(3):262-70. PubMed ID: 21078217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech perception with interaction-compensated simultaneous stimulation and long pulse durations in cochlear implant users.
    Schatzer R; Koroleva I; Griessner A; Levin S; Kusovkov V; Yanov Y; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():99-106. PubMed ID: 25457654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
    Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
    Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Future technology in cochlear implants: assessing the benefit.
    Briggs RJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 May; 12 Suppl 1():S22-5. PubMed ID: 21756467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preliminary experience using a cochlear implant with a novel linear pedestal design.
    Parkes WJ; Gnanasegaram JJ; Cushing SL; James AL; Gordon KA; Papsin BC
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 93():42-46. PubMed ID: 28109496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear implantation for chronic electrical stimulation in the mouse.
    Irving S; Trotter MI; Fallon JB; Millard RE; Shepherd RK; Wise AK
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():37-45. PubMed ID: 24055621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The multi-channel cochlear implant: multi-disciplinary development of electrical stimulation of the cochlea and the resulting clinical benefit.
    Clark GM
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():4-13. PubMed ID: 25159273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electric-acoustic stimulation: for whom, in which ear, and how.
    Ching TY; Incerti P; Plant K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jan; 16 Suppl 1():S12-5. PubMed ID: 25614258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Percutaneous pedestal in cochlear implantation.
    Parkin JL
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1990 Oct; 99(10 Pt 1):796-800. PubMed ID: 2221736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical techniques in cochlear implants.
    Mangus B; Rivas A; Tsai BS; Haynes DS; Roland JT
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2012 Feb; 45(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 22115682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.