644 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29032943)
1. Assessing the validity of oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement in a large population-based epidemiologic study.
Chen Z; Wang X; Wang Z; Zhang L; Hao G; Dong Y; Zhu M; Gao R;
J Am Soc Hypertens; 2017 Nov; 11(11):730-736.e4. PubMed ID: 29032943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of the Omron HEM-705 CP for blood pressure measurement in large epidemiologic studies.
Vera-Cala LM; Orostegui M; Valencia-Angel LI; López N; Bautista LE
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2011 May; 96(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 21468531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the validity of the Omron HEM-907XL oscillometric blood pressure measurement device in a National Survey environment.
Ostchega Y; Nwankwo T; Sorlie PD; Wolz M; Zipf G
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2010 Jan; 12(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 20047626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Disagreement of the two oscillometric blood pressure measurement devices, Datascope Accutorr Plus and Omron HEM-705CP II, and bidirectional conversion of blood pressure values.
Adler C; Ellert U; Neuhauser HK
Blood Press Monit; 2014 Apr; 19(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 24583967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the noninvasive assessment of central blood pressure by the SphygmoCor and Omron devices against the invasive catheter measurement.
Ding FH; Fan WX; Zhang RY; Zhang Q; Li Y; Wang JG
Am J Hypertens; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1306-11. PubMed ID: 21976274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the Omron HBP-1300 in pregnancy for medium-arm and large-arm circumferences according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.
Abbud L; Nzelu D; Salaria M; Kay P; Kametas NA
Blood Press Monit; 2018 Oct; 23(5):277-280. PubMed ID: 29994925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the accuracy and errors of blood pressure measured by 2 types of non-mercury sphygmomanometers in an epidemiological survey.
Choi S; Kim YM; Shin J; Lim YH; Choi SY; Choi BY; Oh KW; Lee HM; Woo KJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(25):e10851. PubMed ID: 29923975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the accuracy of the OMRON HEM-907XL oscillometric blood pressure measurement device in patients with nondialytic chronic kidney disease.
Cohen JB; Wong TC; Alpert BS; Townsend RR
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2017 Mar; 19(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 28079300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of pulse pressure on the accuracy of wrist blood pressure measurement.
Westhoff TH; Schmidt S; Meissner R; Zidek W; van der Giet M
J Hum Hypertens; 2009 Jun; 23(6):391-5. PubMed ID: 19092843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of three automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol: The Omron M3 Intellisense (HEM-7051-E), the Omron M2 Compact (HEM 7102-E), and the Omron R3-I Plus (HEM 6022-E).
Asmar R; Khabouth J; Topouchian J; El Feghali R; Mattar J
Blood Press Monit; 2010 Feb; 15(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 20032779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D
J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the OMRON M3500 Blood Pressure Measuring Device Using Normal- and High-Speed Modes in Adult and Specific Populations (Obese and Children) According to AAMI Protocol.
Chahine MN; Assemaani N; Sayed Hassan G; Cham M; Salameh P; Asmar R
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2015 Aug; 17(8):622-9. PubMed ID: 25833259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auscultatory versus oscillometric measurement of blood pressure in octogenarians.
Rosholm JU; Arnspang S; Matzen L; Jacobsen IA
Blood Press; 2012 Oct; 21(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 22545576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
